In the
situation in that they are the countries of the euro area at the moment, full
with controversies and disagreements one is not able to for less than to stop
and to toss the view behind. How have we arrived until here? It is the first
thing that assaults you to the thought and yes you think a little of it, he
gives you a lot of pain because until here we have arrived to loins of a great
idea, of a great political illusion, to which we have failed him
boisterously.
How great
idea the European Union that great political-social project the one that began
there in Paris in 1951, from then on with more pain than glory, the illusion
and the effort of creating an European Union was overcoming treaty to treaty,
on those beginnings babblings of the big instigators of the project France and
Germany; you passes of simple market of the coal and the steel, to the common
market, to the disappearance of opposite, to the free circulation of people and
capitals among countries, many irreconcilable times, until creating an only
currency for all the EURO, and here it breaks the European dream.
The currency
uncovers the substantial differences of the European countries and they leave
to it floats the enormous differences among them, this accuses very clearly
that the dream of an united Europe is not possible in the current geopolitical
and economic situation, because it is not homogeneous in anything, neither in
the spoken language, neither in the economy, neither in the condition of
European. Europe continues being a continent one and don't unite union of
countries, and one aim back and it feels pain because we have not been able to
arrive to the final objective.
Then you
think, maybe in the future, and you look forward and worse then you feel
terror, because you realize that the future is behind the turn. The economic crisis demands changes in the
European Union; radical transformations that they would have been gestating in
Germany whose chancellor believes for months that it cannot have an authentic
fiscal, economic union, without a real political union. But at the same time
this idea, another wonderful and certain time, he runs the risk that against
what happened in 1951, be not of the pleasure of the other theoretical
components of the same one. The German minister of Finances already said it,
Wolfgang Schaüble: the European Union should experience a quick and radical
integration that goes by a strong surrender of national sovereignty.
But France is shown reticent to give
sovereignty to the UE., and it is in the antipodes of what Germany thinks, he
believes that first it is necessary to arrive to a fiscal union, and then, to
advance in the political union. Berlin, on the other hand, defends that it is
not possible that some they become responsible for other if before sovereignty
is not given the UE and he makes sure that there is a control common of the
national decisions in economic" matter, Germany would be willing to
continue ahead with its plan in spite of who weighs him, although to give
sovereignty to Brussels herself it should reform its constitution, company that
you points it could attack after the elections of autumn of 2013.es to say apart
from the uncertain characteristic of a political change in the elections we are
speaking as little of 12 months late.
This is
almost what is presented as future, the same thing that has failed as past, and
it is not necessary to say that if it is the same thing it passed the same
thing it will fail. It is not also possible this solution basically for the
time to use in summing up it, the euro group cannot wait other 2 years under
the current conditions of political and economic in governability, it is of
logic, there are countries without possibility of self-financing, without
possibility of surviving economically low the umbrella tyrant of the euro,
these countries in one year more they are unrecoverable, then arrived at the
end of this period of time the alone outlined solution it would be possible in
a still more reduced European Union, possibly to those first 6 founders and
initiators of the adventure.
Don't fit
them doubt this he/she is the logical vision and realist of the future of the
euro group, and frankly to my he/she gives me terror, because if something is
safe it is that Spain won't be in the final group of here to 1 or 2 years seen,
our road as that of other more ones is in the turn to the autochthonous economy
and to survive in a world totally far from the central europa, this is evident,
and I find that the most sensible thing would be to already begin to outline
it, because to maintain the hope that it really ends up existing a political
and economic union of the UE, it is or to my he looks like each other this way
it, a complete utopia.