ANYTHING IS ETERNAL AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WE UNDERSTAND IT BETTER FOR ALL

We have to change, we cannot continue anchored in the old customs for very effective that have been, it arrives a moment that for circumstances unaware to our will the things even, change and we should change with them, the first thing that we have to think is that we won't be in this world nothing else that our own time of life, therefore we cannot cling to our customs or beliefs and we don't have to be afraid to the changes because maybe can happen that neither we live them. 

The economic situation partner and politics that he has played us to live now, require a total turn that it is safe, it is clear that to continue making the things equal as up to now it doesn't work, the causes are countless, the immigration, the European union, the autonomies, the technology, the industrial globalization, the politicians in excess, the fourth to be able to without control some, the third world that has become the first one, everything influences; the consequences, we don't have work for all and the one that there is different, we cannot hope dad pays us well the to be, enough will make if he administers us with good sense and justness, in a word, there is off to change we are finished our scenario and we have to act otherwise. 

One of the first things that I mean the Spaniards, it is that not alone we have to lose the fear to the privatization but rather we must demand it urgently, because it is necessary to change the main mark in that he leans on the society that is the political government, the privatizations they bear some give adjustments, but the advantages to the long one, they are many for the society, the first one although it seems lie it is that it removes him to be able to the politicians, thing of the one that now I hope we all have learned, and we know where it has taken us, the main company of the country is the state in all its slopes and that can no longer continue among other things because it is in absolute crash and because its administration and agents are disastrous.  

They want examples: It is necessary to privatize the railroads, they know you that the RENFE and ADIF prepare of more budget and personal that many ministries, they have been given for informed of the useless AVE that have built. It is necessary to privatize the airports physically and in their administration, you know the airports not profitable and ramshackle for not speaking of those without flights neither passengers that have been built. It is necessary to privatize the marine ports; you know the expenses that bear some ports that alone they stay because an official entity that he calls himself "Ports of the State" exists.  

It is necessary to privatize the TV, when the government loves us something that rents the time that he needs in commercial and private televisions and he says it, after he is devoted to govern and not to spend money in "having a good time pardon I meant to influence us, we will already make it us alone. And I have left for the end of the chapter, the fattest thing is to privatize the infrastructures and the sanitary administration, I have not said the Social security that is another thing and this if it should be a public service. The how to make it is another topic that other experts should plan. 

And for I finish at the moment and until we regulate the national demography, it is necessary to work less so that they can work more, to me it has always missed me that the unions have in this respect so little that to say, rather alone they have to say that we will pay general or partial strike the attention it depends, but they don't outline changes labor, new forms of working and of using, it doesn't stop them everything should follow the manager equally he/she steals to the worker and the worker steals the manager the new labor law it didn't work until there is work to regulate while it will be necessary to regulate the little work that there is or to continue paying subsidies.  

This would be a contribution of the modern society, and this would not be this way for always, but now that there is so much unemployed because there is little work, it is obvious that he would be necessary to work less, it is logical not, because he doesn't think about the labor day of 30 hours a weekly, this is a little less than 20% of the current day, it seems logical that if we have 25% unemployment and let us believe a hole of similar size, equal would fit many more hard-working they don't find it. Because 30 hours you will wonder, because it is necessary that daily the resulting schedule is multiple of the 24 hours for the shifts that have to square this way in a labor week of 5 days, 4 followed shifts they would be worked and without unemployment some of 6 hours completes this way the 24 and at the same time five days to reason of 6 hours for shift are thirty hours a week.  

The thing this in knowing how to negotiate this among the companies, the workers, and the government, so that the economic effects are adjusted among all, evidently the worker cannot pass to charge 20% less, but for sure something less if, because in many cases the couple, or a son would work that now it is in unemployment etc. and let us don't say of the possibility of reconciling the time free, less kangaroos, less charwomen, more power to go to the market, time to eat, etc.  

The manager would be amazed that possibly the yield the productivity would not lower 20%, as a lot among 8/10%, it would continue there being unemployment but the one calls him logical 8/10%, this is not a story it is proven that the efficiency stays very much better in a short space of time that in longer days, and lastly the government should adjust the worker's tax part and of the company so that the result of the salary cost, was assumable for both parts. 

Certainly the unions would also should of stopping to interfere in topics of labor schedules, mainly in the commercial schedule the companies, and the trade should have the freedom of opening so much and as they want, to be able to make variable of personal as weekend insoles, with application of run shifts, or workers that always prefer to work Saturdays and Sundays, and clear in works that allow it or they require it, hear them I assure that there are a lot of people that if can win enough working two days, it stops then for example, to paint, to write, to study, they would make it. 

The topics enunciated serious easy question are very already explained to apply them I assure it to him and the exchange society to better an atrocity, let us remove to the state what is not of the state, and let us give the work and the profitability to the civil society that he/she administers it to him efficiently and responsibly they don't find.