martes, 13 de octubre de 2015

WITH ALL RESPECT I RESPOND TO THEIR LORDSHIPS OF THE "TSJC" THEIR NOTE IT PUBLISHES OF TODAY



Barcelona October 13 2015. 

Lordships what you call calls to concentrate before the Palace of Justice is made by civil people in use of their perfect right of summoning them the fact that promotes them as yourselves they indicate it is a case so unusual coma the appearance to declare of members and the governments of the Generalitad former members that which for if alone it is reason more than enough so that the Catalan society that considers it opportune he goes to witness a fact I repeat unusual that is the first time that happens in this community. 

The questions that concern to the operation of the Judicial Power, essential institution in all democratic society, they always reveal a general interest, their lordships say in their note, this alone it still justifies more than it leaves of the Catalan society he has interest in attending from outside of their facilities to the event in yes and to show their support to the imputed assistants that they will declare before their lordships. There has not been any interference to their work neither threats neither quarrel some in the fact in yes, in consequence, all the jurisdictional decisions that 

Their lordships adopt they will be subjected to the control and the public critic. The same thing that the public attendances that are organized to such an effect. These facts should not make forget to their lordships their judicial function, because in any moment the concentrations of curious and indignant citizens are made inside their judicial dependences with what they don't alter their functions unless these the sufficiently justified ones are not or outside of the artificial normality. 

It is ultimately the society. The guarantor of the Justice, value foundational of the Constitutional State, their action needs of the trust of the society, source, also, of its genuineness. Therefore he doesn't have any value of judicial alteration the one that more or less friends partners and curious of those imputed they want to support with their presence to prosecuted statements unless I repeat that their lordships understand that these appearances are more a show that a strictly judicial act. And in this case they should still care less them. 

Government's Room cannot remain impassive when it verifies that  manifestations and concentrations are summoned to the door of Palacio of Justice with the objective of questioning the genuineness of the Judges this you imagine it lordships or it is that it is this way what is happening that they are very questionable the appearances that their lordships have mentioned. And their lordships also say that these concentrations seek to influence in its taking of decisions. It supposes them to it a direct attack and without palliatives to the judicial independence even questioning it. I fear myself lordships that this is an excuse, nobody has interrupted in their rooms of justice nobody it has interrupted them in their functions everything of what they complain it has happened in the road it publishes. 

The essential foundations of the Constitutional State are perfectly kept by the own assisting society keeping the opportune distances and without intent some of being surpassed in their posture of mere observers and supporting their rulers and former ruler has never attempted neither to shame them neither to irritate them with screams or offensive insults toward their lordships.  

Their lordships owe to remember that the judicial independence is not a privilege of the Judges, but a guarantee of the citizens. For that reason their attitude a point in alarm terms or of threat, I would dare to tell them if their lordships allow it to me, he is not justified in the previously this thing, Its question to these acts of democratic freedom exercised by the Catalan society is even more inadmissible when it can come off that their lordships are threatening with which its justness and its trial can take them to act in an undue way, applying some sentences non chords unconsciously with the facts to judge applying an action of indirect vengeance for some facts happened in the road publishes that to their lordships they have caused them stupor or wrong to be. 

If this can be this way, the first thing that you/they should make their lordships is to be impeached of continuing then with the established processes it is evident that they are conditioned as he comes off of their own official statement, fact that is clear with their advances that their lordships have been seen affected for that some facts unaware to their work accuse them of responding to a favored, designed strategy and headed by public representatives, some of them with government's functions.    

In this sense, the Room remembers the non-inherencies duty that links especially to those that are part of the other powers, in those that he is organized our political system. I insist you come ghosts where there are not them it is very logical that people and public characters are accompanied and supported by hundreds of friends and for the own society to the one that you/they represent and they direct.   

I insist. To question that the performance of civil people is limited to give accompaniment and support to its friends and some and rulers others in a disinterested way is the same thing that to insinuate that the performance of the alone Tribunals of Justice is due to political interests, and that its performance promotes the give social trust and the strategies of pressure of the same one constitute one  negation of the bases of our political coexistence.  

Alone from the respect to the democratic values can guarantee you the exercise and protection of the fundamental rights recognized in our Constitution. And in that measure we claim responsibility that is to say to those that have the duty of guaranteeing the coexistence in peace and freedom, to their lordships members of the judicial power also. 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario