AFTER OF THE DEBATE OR CHANGED THE STRUCTURES OF THE STATE, OR THE CHAOS ARE INSURED

This undoubtedly the situation of the Spanish state after yesterday's debate is of complete immobility or rather of a hairspring movement that always returns to the same starting point for many turns that the politicians want to give: a model of centralist state with dictatorial reminiscences caused by the too much power that accumulates in a political class that is unable to worry about another thing that it is not their ego and their good salary and led conditions. The power in this country corrupts and he comes making it for centuries this is to look of changing it. 

It is evident that the politics and the government of a country should make it unfortunately human people for us there is not a machine able to make it in spite of the big advances of the technique the computer it has not still been given that thinks by itself. So any solution that we think to fix or said otherwise to redo the Spanish debacle it should go by the humans and in this case for the politicians, and after that seen yesterday, it is clear that the politicians that acted in the most terrible drama that I have seen in my life, the Debate of the state of the Nation, none of them can pick up the witness and to reconstruct another state and with it to save a nation. 

Said this believes that we should obviate the politicians and to look more to the state, we should change the laws of the right state to get the politicians not to accumulate the power in the way that now happens, and that he makes that the democracy becomes "políticcracy" and transform some gentlemen into owners of the future one and almost of the life of the citizens that they confirm the society of a nation. It is evident that it should have a government and some structures I would say that the same ones of now but what cannot be is that the power leaves the society and he appropriates it alone a part of the society that is to say the politicians this is what is happening now, and for that reason the society goes afraid and infuriated that he cannot make anything that they have usurped him its paper that when the constitution says that the power resides in the town this is lie or worse the politicians have even adapted it to him. 

My followers only know a work that I have published several times on the transformation of the Spanish state in a federal state made up of three federations but today I don't want to insist in this but in how to fix the question of avoiding that being possible manipulates and it is kidnapped on the part of a group of political as it is happening now and that he makes what wants or they even send him against the town and east legally cannot make anything, and slave of this group will remain without fail during four years. 

It cannot be that the powers concentrate without fail on a single hand this is what is spending in Spain from the XV century, they change the hands but it doesn't change the style to dominate the power, I believe that this happens because he has united the power to a single fact that can take to an absolutist action, unless the electoral law prohibits that an electoral alternative that grants an absolute majority exists this provides a democratic command in fact not but dictatorial because you can make what gives you the desire during four years like minimum, because this excludes the possibility to introduce any action of repulse to the government and the ruler it is useless one cannot make anything the whole country, the power, everything is monopolized. 

This that like he said it is democratic and you cannot correct for law but alone for the own voter calculates that this situation cannot be given because it is bad and this repeats it is impossible, but however if it can think about intermediate stages that can correct the accumulations of power legally if it is necessary or convenient to make them and this decision to put it in hands of the town. As making it, because we see: it is necessary to separate the electoral periods of the different powers of the state, I explain to myself the legislative periods according to the current constitution they are of four years, well giving this term like good the election form should be the following one first the government is chosen the president of the country that is to say but not the congress, the president elect form his government and it governs faced to a congress that can be he kindred or not. 

To the two years of their election they are carried out the elections of the deputies because this very simple if during these first two years the elect president demonstrates an effectiveness a syntony with what the town needs and for what I vote him it rewarded him reinforcing it with its congress members and its power increased, but this will keep in mind that alone it will last him two years because if it abuses of him when he has to opt to the reelection the town he can tell him that not and to vote another president and so forth but in a natural way without obligation some if the applied politics continues being the one that the town approves it will follow to choose other four years but the important thing is that this system implies that every two years the politician and its politics will suffer a true exam on the part of the society. 

Let us transport this example to the current situation there are now a dissatisfaction and a great restlessness about the current government's capacity and we cannot make anything imagines for a moment that the month of December of this 2013 has elections for the Congress the logical thing it is that the society corrects the government's absolutism compensating by means of the congress its absolute one to be able to what would make correct many politicians of those that we are very unhappy and concerned with all security. I believe that it is clear the idea is totally democratic it would always rot the society to very personal or one-party tendencies in the politics and the government of such an important thing for all as the politics of the country where we live.