IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO BE ABLE TO UNIFY APPROACHES IN THE EUROPE OF THE EURO

Today the French president, François Hollande, in a speech before the camera of Strasbourg has criticized this Tuesday without naming him to the first British minister, David Cameron, to question the whole European project, but in turn a "Europe has defended differed" in the one that some States advances for its bill in projects like the rate to the financial transactions. This means an europa to different speeds, I believe that yes but with shades, in fact it would not be to organize an europa to two speeds, like it was spoken in 2011 but rather I understand that of what is it is of not to force to that all the members of the union go to the same rhythm that one marks of them, I eat now it seems to impose Germany. 

Europe cannot be satisfied with being a market, a budget, a currency, for very beautiful that are these instruments, it cannot neither be a sum of Treaties, a group of necessary rules to live together. Europe cannot neither be a sum of nations that they only come to look for to the Union what they find useful", Hollande has said in a speech before the full of the Euro camera. Brilliant I agree totally with Hollande but then that it should be Europa "Monsieur le Presiden”. 

Hollande has added immediately that it considers "legitimate to work in a new architecture of the Union". "I defend a differentiated Europe, according to Jacques' expression Delors. It won't be a Europe to two speeds that soon would be unequal and divided. It is not neither a Europe to the letter", he has explained. The differentiated Europe is a Europe in the one that the States, not always the same ones, decide to advance, to undertake new projects, to commit financing, to begin new politicians beyond the substantial root that should remain, of common competitions.  

Mr. Hollande you without daring to say it are defining an European Federal Union you without maybe to want it is saying that each nation should condition its economy its governability its possibilities inside a group guided by a centralized unit and that of a general but not limitative neither excluding homogeneity of the economic reality and geopolitics of each nation that compose it, for you the certain bases exist already it stops starting from them to undertake the reconversion of the UE., they are the space without opposite Schengen, the creation of the euro or the setting in march from the rate to the financial transactions. The nucleus of this Europe will be the euro zone that should be endowed from a better government and an own budget to its opinion. 

Interesting project that it didn't square with the squared German spirit and it didn't square because the great problem of the money exists in Catalunya a very clear sentence it exists in this respect "Qui paga mana" who pays it orders and this is what is happening and destroying the real unit of the euro area and with it of the project of the European union, it is evident that the system is to change it because otherwise it will jump for the airs I enter other things because Germany eternally won't be able to continue attending the finances of the euro. 

Also because if he is not snatched this obligation controlling that the whole economy is in its power will be continually, and this is the error that is making, I have told it other times: "Europe is not Germany but Germany if it is Europe in these moments" and this cannot be this way, neither for the good of the euro area, neither of the European Union, neither of the own Germany.