The 'Financial
Times' he complains in a published article this Friday the "onlooker
mistrust from Spain to negotiate with Catalonia" other alternatives. The
international editor of the British newspaper, David Gardner, analyzes the
reaction of the United Kingdom and Spain to the movements Catalan and Scottish independencies
and it assures that "the possible answer to the problem should not be
separatism or unionism; it could be a creative form of federalism". With
everything, it admits that "the word, for not speaking of the formula,
causes semantic chills in the vertebral political column of both
countries", according to Gardner, the idea of the "state
characteristic" of Artur Mas it could fit "in a reformed"
constitution.
In the article of
David Gardner, titled 'Spain and the United Kingdom should not fear the word of
the letter F'(I think refers to Freedom),
it assures that it is not accidental" that the independencies grows in two
states that are "old, proud imperial" nations search of monarchic
type. The international editor of the British newspaper denounces in the
article that to "deny the freedom on behalf of the equality, it is a
concept obsolete" Jacobin, but that however it is not this way when he
refers to the fiscal solidarity. In fact it seems that both are, Catalan and
Scottish, in oneself political tessitura, we cannot be free because we pay too
much to those that unite us for the god grace some and for the constitution
others.
To both you us tilde
of nationalist that which us demonize for the word that as always have said, he
doesn't have pejorative character some, but alone reflective a feeling of love
and pride to what is been, or he feels to be, however the other “majority nationalists”
the Spaniards and British to who these small Catalan and Scottish nationalists
request them that they look at us with more empathy to detect the realities and
the formal decision that there are behind so much speech and manifestation
separatist they don't want neither to listen to us at least to the
Catalan.
Other the Scotsmen
have been listened more or less by the government from Great Britain, but on
the contrary before the Catalan, Madrid uses the constitution of Spain like a
Bible to hit us an and another time in the mouth when we try to communicate.
With all London he threatens the Scotsmen of leaving them without the sterling
pound and both capitals, with the echo of Brussels; they warn that the
independence means the probable exit of the UE.
Both processes now
got complicated also, at least the Catalan, because the Spanish government is
already taking advantage of the case of Crimea it stops in an act of total
historical and ethical moral indignity, Rajoy takes advantage of it in the
meeting of the European rights in Dublin, for almost to make swear that the UE
defends the insolubility of the current nations, this besides offending us to
the Catalan, (to match us in some circumstances absolutely different to those
that happen in Crimea), I fear myself that it denotes a swagger and an absolute
irresponsibility on the part of Spain, I am not able to for less than thinking
that he would be making Spain if Catalonia for those circumstances is
"being helped by France."
This way for this
on the way to direct and indirect attacks, trying to put on in some
inadmissible and nonexistent evidences, we don't go toward a solution but
toward a confrontation, don't doubt it, I don't know like it finished Crimea
and their reconquest, but the most probable thing is that finally it is Russian
again, among other things because that it is their origin, and because in fact
they are being invaded, I believe me that not alone for Russian feelings but
for the Russian army because to Russia Crimea interests him and to scare of so
much as long as to this Europe that calls oneself "united", but that
it is a club of partners to which more selfish and interested alone in its
nationalist and economic power.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario