The Superior Tribunal of Justice of Madrid has
condemned the judge Elpidio José Silva to 17 and a half years of
disqualification for a prevarication crime and two against the individual
freedom for incarcerations the former president's of Madrid saving bank Miguel
Blesa and the manager Gerardo Díaz Ferrán. I believe that all my readers know
the facts but for those that don't know the reason that to a judge he is
condemned we make a small summary. The magistrate investigated the purchase of
an American bank and also a credit of 26,6 million Eurus granted in 2009 to
Gerardo Díaz Ferrán, then consultant of the box and proprietor of the group
Marsans, (travel agency and tourism) already in the jail for another case.
Curious truth I don't understand much of laws but I pride
myself on to understand and to make common sense and I think that if a judge
requests to imprison an individual that has worn out an entire box of savings
until taking it to the crash giving the wearing out the money of his depositors
in impossible business and being given it before to his friends of the most
antisocial managerial mafia in Spain like the mentioned Díaz Ferrán, I would
give him the benefit from the doubt to the judge not to the criminal but in
Spain this doesn't go this way here the democratic fact that you are innocent
until the opposite is demonstrated, it is taken to the last consequences, and
against more near the power these more innocent one is, in this case more than
the judge that already that is to say.
In short the question it is that the office of the
state didn't want to admit or better to tolerate that the one mentioned Blesa
was imprisoned and I force the judge to liberate it the reason of this
situation so curious it was not another that to avoid that Blesa can get scared
and to begin to sing all those that he tasted from so many near masters to the
peak of the PP this passed in the 2013.
So Mr. Blesa complained against the judge after leaving the jail and
Silva it ended up being processed, accused of a presumed continuous crime of
prevarication and malicious retard in the administration of Justice, although
the trial that began in January was suspended at the end of April by its
challenge at two of the magistrates of the tribunal that he judged it.
The managerial oligarchy and politics of the Spanish
right didn't feel satisfied with it and it continued attacking the judge so I
accuse him Silva it was also accused also by a crime of revelation of secrets
to publish the former president's of Box electronic mail Madrid, that they
demonstrated certain beginnings of the crimes for which the judge had ordered
the penitentiary detention of Blesa, to avoid that this can manipulate tests
and even to escape from the country. The Tribunal also condemned Silva,
disabled to exercise the judicature from February, to pay 10.000 Eurus to Díaz
Ferrán in concept of moral damages.
Silva reached the fame after sending to provisional
prison to Blesa, to the one that imputed several crimes now to the front of the
box of savings integrated in Bankia between 1996 and 2009, and it undertook a
campaign of accusation of the corruption in Spain and its extension to the
Justice. and Silva like he said it ended up being processed, accused of a
presumed continuous crime of prevarication and malicious retard in the
administration of Justice, although the trial that began in January was suspended
at the end of April by its challenge at two of the magistrates of the tribunal
that he judged it. Silva threw a campaign mediate to affirm that the
accusations in its against they had political motivations and a negative effect
in the investigations of cases of corruption.
Baltasar Garzón, the former internationally well-known
Spanish judge to pursue the Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, and it was also
accused of prevarication and suspended of the judicial career in 2010 to record
the conversations of some suspects of the case of corruption illegally Gürtel.
(That now have been authorized to be used by the unstoppable scandal that this
case means) even affecting to the Spanish real house. It is another case that
demonstrates that Elpidio José is not the exception of the rule but the
confirmation of the disaster of the justice in Spain.
Saving Box Madrid immerse was seen in problems after
the explosion of the real estate bubble in 2008. It was rebaptized as Bankia
after fuses in 2010 with other six saving boxes, but with thousands of millions
of toxic loans to real estate promoters, soon he needed a rescue of 22.500
million Eurus. The rescue of the box, its disastrous exit to bag of 2011, and
the complex debt instruments disguised of saving deposits unchained a series of
penal investigations. Silva was investigating if Blesa avoided the norms on the
administration of risks when Saving Box Madrid City bought National Bank of
Florida in 2008.
In June it emitted a car in which said that there were
evidences of four crimes: association, of disloyal administration, falsehood of
mercantile document, and undue appropriation and it decreed provisional prison
for Blesa, it was in freedom after paying a deposit and their lawyers then
complained that Silva had abused of its authority. The office of Madrid opened
an investigation on the judge for prevarication and malicious retard in the
administration of justice and crimes against the individual freedom of
Blesa.
The curious of the case and that he leaves again in
evidence to the justice and the government from Spain it is that the judge's
final condemnation Silva is given after last week it was known that more than
80 executives and directive of Box Madrid and then Bankia used opaque cards for
personal expenses. And naturally among those investigated Blesa they figure
another time and their successor in Bankia, Rodrigo Rato that was also former
minister of the Party Popular and former managing manager of the International
Monetary Fund.
Well this is the government from Spain politicians
corrupt combines among friends of having left graft of funds sumptuary expenses
paid by the society in short I believe that the reader will understand because
the government has made act to the Constitutional Tribunal, in 48 hours so that
suspends caution the law of consultations for vote of Catalonia, and it is not
because it is illegal, it is because if one throws ahead and Catalonia becomes
independent of Spain, this Spain that I have not drawn here but the action of
the political and managers mentioned, it could not be sustained economically
that clear
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario