It was "an error to allow entering to Greece in the area euro. In the 2001 their economy
was not prepared. We have paid the consequences now", I declare in their
day Nicolás Sarkozy. If Mister it is
it was this way an error, the question it is that once grateful having made an
error of so much and so disastrous repercussion, is calm, this doesn't pass in
any other aspect again, and I tell to you and all the enormous quantity of
political and economic leaders that the European Union prepares that we can no
longer make a mistake more.
A thing is not to guess right and another very different one is to make
a mistake, the things don't have the security of always leaving like one wait,
but what should not happen is that you make a mistake almost knowingly that
these making another error, waiting that the time or the luck fixes it, this in
politics always flaw and it is also inappropriate of an organization of the
importance of the European Union.
I am afraid that past the crucial moment in that we have stayed in the
border of the cliff for the hair toward where we went, let us stop sweaty and
still trembling but with that sensation of "Uffff, almost", and this
cannot allow it, because if we are still looking at the bottom of the cliff,
the smallest blast of wind or the lightest dissipation will make us fall.
I already know that I am very redundant in my opinion in this respect,
but it is that I believe that there is not another positive teaching of what
happens to us that to attempt so much globalized government's politics as the
economic one and mainly the district attorney of the European Union, and
sincerely I don't see on the part of the members of the euro group, neither of
the entirety of the 28, neither that they are neither interested neither that they
can sustain this possibility for that reason the things they go to worse
because the alone UE can offer time but don't solve.
And they don't doubt it if this is not changed, we will be making the "last error" after the one
which, they will no longer have neither you excuse neither possible
arrangement, the situation that at the moment have not saved alone it is not
definitive, but rather he has also left us headdresses for some how many
decades if everything goes well, and the worst thing is that among half of this
period, they will have new crisis, changes of political, etc. and mainly
national elections that will be 28 possibilities of interferences and changes
of political, but it is that they can be but according to the plans of the
treaty of Lisbon (that surprisingly not previous that could be less, another
bundle error).
It is too complicated to harmonize all this political and economic
disparity, we realize that they can have countries in that their politicians
are socialist for example other conservatives, for what the community
guidelines can be interpreted with different you even tinge being the same
ones. This that would not be a serious problem if doesn't affect nothing else
that to a strict national environment, he takes disaster character when their
consequences transcend this environment, and they complicate the approvals of
normative community and the global economic politicians.
He doesn't play me to my to define as structuring the European Union,
although I have manifested several times my opinion in this respect, but I
believe sincerely that it should be a total priority being devoted entirely to
find the system that is able to fuse the dispersion of the states members in a
single and accustomed to community politics. Said clearly it is necessary to
get the European, alone true Union of States we will survive this way, and a
condition that should already be peremptory is that it would be necessary to
contemplate not to add nations but unloading the UE of some of them.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario