THE ORIGIN OF THE INDEPENDENCE IS ALWAYS THE SAME ONE TO ESCAPE FROM ANY TYPE OF OPPRESSION

It seems that the independency in Scotland gives impulse to the movements separatists in Spain and possibly in other Europa nations still to confirm. This way the influential economic newspaper of the City of London, Financial Times, says its analysis about the consequences that it could carry the possibility of a victory of the 'yes' to the independence in Scotland in the referendum that takes place this Thursday. The mentioned opinion article, he goes cultured with a picture of the V of the “Diada in Barcelona” of last week, and he opens the web of the newspaper this Monday in the morning.  

According to the British, so much newspaper Catalonia, in Spain; and the Veneto and Tyrol of the South, in Italy, the lips are licking before the perspective that Scotland votes the secession of “United Kingdom”, a "enthusiasm" that, it points out the newspaper, it is not shared by the international community of investors and it points out that "the increase of the yield of the funds to 10 years Italian and Spaniards reflects the fears of the investors to that a 'yes in Scotland it could take to the rupture of Italy or Spain."  

The newspaper points out that in Catalonia, Tyrol of the South and Veneto it has rooted the idea that the local prosperity strays in benefit of the corrupt ones, the intimidation and the economically incompetent elites of Madrid and Rome, also explains that "the central Government from Spain" waited that the "scandal of fiscal escape that surrounds Jordi Pujol, father of the nationalism modern Catalan", it will tunnel the manifestation of the Diada, thing that didn't happen the Urban Watch from Barcelona since it calculated in 1,8 million assistants in this popular manifestation.  

My God, that little the Englishmen of independence know, like one notices that they have never had to become independent, but rather just the opposite have had to suffer the fact on the contrary, that is to say to go losing their clerks one after other, and clear each one judges the things like they go him, for that reason the Financial Times sees an economic problem basically and you see it because Great Britain has lived this way him, of dominating half world it has become a small island of the one that already other they also love each other to free. 

Is the question that the English economists are asked very simple what he will stay? And this transfers it to the other nations that have cases of independence in march and this way all they bound it to the economic fact, and it is not only this, to the necessity of looking for the independence you arrives for several reasons but basically there is one he makes that a society wants to get it, and it is well the injustice that suffers on the part of the state oppressor, it is true that there is the economic effect in all the independence, like one of the main reasons, but it is it because it is also itself a reason of oppression. 

I don't know any independence that has been forged because their societies didn't feel that their economies were plundered in a way or other, for the state oppressor that is to say is not the economic fact of having more, the base of the independence, but the one of having less for the usurpation of a part of the local economy that is swindled to improve the oppressor's economy that is not able to increase his own. 

And this is the problem of Scotland and Catalonia (this besides the intervention of the state in the Catalan nationalist feelings without any consideration). if Scotland and Catalonia see clearly that the economic load that they support went equal to the one that would obtain for themselves, they won't be planted an independence, and at the same time if the state oppressor doesn't see that they are right and that indeed they will lose a lot of economic capacity, neither they would have any interest in to oppose you to that the has its independence. 

Now we are speaking of Scotland and Catalonia but don't doubt that in few months, before the inefficacy of the economic measures of the UE, the independence of whole countries began in front of the UE, inside little France, Italy and Germany, they got tired of having to support, both first to their societies that were revolutionized by the loss of their respective purchasing powers, and the third by the idea of their society that is losing this same power, because they "take off" it to help to the other ones, and this is my friends they will request this way never the independence the rich ones, the poor will always request it this is a fact consummated by the centuries of history that we store. 

And it doesn't pass anything, the new independence incorporate to the wheel of the economy and I eat it interests to all the rich ones that the things work, because they work, and after point to threaten is that the managers duplicate their business and they trade in the two places and they prosper, you really believe that the Scottish banks left Scotland, no way another thing is that their headquarters or office of banking of business move to London, because it is there it is where the centers of world financial movements are, there the offices of business of the German, French banks and the bank of Santander are also and that I know Spain he has not still become independent