When it began
to emerge “PODEMOS", he is crossed out of populist and truly that a point
if it seemed him, because in synthesis that that the boys of “PODEMOS", they
said on the problems of the society, and on the government's politics that
reigns in Spain it seemed this way him. My followers remembered that I wrote an
article on this political platform and non populist denominates it, but neo communist,
today I affirm myself in it after reading some points of the draft of her
economic proposal of her possible government again.
These
proposals are picked up in the document elaborated by the economists Juan
Torres and Vincenç Navarro that are advising to the party in the economic
environment, and frankly not you who they are but dreamer if the advisers or
those advised, and of those who are more outside of the current reality of the
world economy, because they don't realize that we are already in this
circumstance, the economy is already world and for what I have read “PODEMOS",
and their advisers want to invent a new system economic politician to be
located them to the front of this impossible country.
I also
reaffirm myself in that the specified measures are completely old and they come
from the communist doctrine that died already, that he makes more difficult to
understand that they want this group of youths that they look back
scandalously. “PODEMOS", he wants in synthesis to create a new scenario in
the world, this that is well, falls when they seek to make it with old measures
that failed because they arrived for some circumstances that are not completed
in the western world and capitalist in that Spain is included.
Another thing
is what I fear myself and that it is that “PODEMOS", he wants to take to
Spain to a neo communism and with it to create an isolated country of the other
ones, with an economy of scarce survival, and without reactivation possibility
some, not me defeatist's will thresh and to comment some of its economic
ideas.
Restructuring
of the conventional debt with Europe, The economists of “PODEMOS", they
recommend mechanisms that guarantee to combine the debt to avoid inequalities
among the sovereign debts, and the supervision from the financial system to
European scale. Very beautiful but this is requesting maybe for years about
three and the UE that it owes obedience to Germany, he refuses an and another
time, he doesn't go it is necessary to have under the current conditions of the
UE a debt unification that is so what means to combine, following the ideas of
we Can the road that they would continue in principle it would be the
restructuring of the debt.
Juan Torres
the high level of indebtedness that Spain suffers has highlighted and he has
said that the politicians of the PP can take to a situation of disordered
restructuring or of unpaid and it is necessary to cut that dynamics to avoid
catastrophic consequences. The economist has also assured that "Spain
should try to find positions that it allowed to relax the conditions to be able
to leave ahead". Torres has explained that they have advised to “PODEMOS",
that it "negotiates and dialogue that looks for allies in the European
institutions to avoid that the debt becomes a mortal rope. The restructuring
should not be fruit of a unilateral decision but of consent."
It is evident
that he is saying the same thing that I have pointed previously, but it is also
evident that it stops this it is not necessary “PODEMOS", this has to make
it any party that governs when once and for all the government of Rajoy
finishes, but they don't finish the observations that we could call common to
any future government of Spain, here the recipe of these experts of we Can to
combat the indebtedness it passes to "get more revenues and to revise the
expense". That is to say more or the same cuttings and to dream with which
the UE is reactivated and it drags us, because alone Spain is impossible that
it increases revenues.
Followed act
finds another contradiction that is very dangerous because he doesn't keep
balance with it previously advised, to go up wages and to reduce the labor day
at 35 weekly hours, they very already explained to me like they decrease costs
and expenses going up salaries and lowering working hours, the few companies
that we have left don't believe that they applaud these measures a lot,
undoubtedly if we go converting the companies in you publish then already, what
they want. In this point, the economist has explained that is fundamental to
"create employment and to redistribute the work diminishing the Labor Day
at 35 weekly" hours, this off to redistribute or to distribute like love
me sounds more and more to poverty and reactivation impossibility.
To create a
tax for the rich ones and to fight against the fraud, another contradiction, if
they feel more taxes for the rich ones that defend that the big fortunes don't
pay enough taxes in Spain according to the economists, prepare as to fight
against the escape of capitals, not against the fraud, because it won't be
necessary, there won't be who can make it they won't be here, this analysis that
he pleads then to increase the revenues through the fight against the fiscal
fraud won't be necessary.
Invigoration
of the Unions, the experts have defended the invigoration of the unions. The
document explains that the union power stations have "been weakened"
during the crisis and he believes that they should have a bigger presence to
push the ascent of the wages. The jubilation age to the 65 years is
"against the delay from the jubilation age to the 67 years. We bet to
leave it in the 65 years and that there is flexibility", he has said
Navarro. Also, it has defended that the serious problem of the pensions is not
a demographic question but rather "the youths don't have work or a good
work" my mother, if this is not a demographic problem because I don't
understand it in Spain there is more and more old and less young proportionally
and if to this he unites that the youths don't have work and they leave,
because they will already tell me that we are speaking.
I don't want to
comment that of the basic rent, because it is alone electoral sentence. These
two economists have also defended the necessity to increase the public expense
in education, sanity and social services and of going up the pensions.
"The State of the Well-being is an investment and an infrastructure to
create employment", Torres has argued. "Instead of investing in the
AVE so that the travelers go from Madrid to Barcelona that they build childhood
schools. This is economically viable, it has assured Navarro. After etas
conclusions I believe sincerely that PODEMOS he doesn't know very well where he
wants to govern or he/she believes that it will govern a society of
dreamer.
And lastly the
narrow lace edging a public Banking, these experts bet for a public banking
that doesn't only depend on the State but rather it also includes cooperative
of credit. Here it is evident that we are in a community and communist régime
that is a disaster, a public banking it is the way that you/they already had
the governments and communist members defenestrates, to have all the exclusive
differences with regard to the town or the society that he doesn't have access
to the public banking that is the same thing that has been Bank Madrid or
Bankia or Caixa Catalunya etc. in definitive
But it is that
also if a Public Banking is believed they close all the private banks because
who will give the credits (that won't give them) where they deposited the money
the society, because that, in the public banking so the Santander the BBVA etc.
will have to abandon the country or to break and let us remember that both are
systemic, with that that or we are in the UE or we are not, both things at the
same time cannot cohabit "The credit it should be a right", Vincenç
has said this it is a madness, what is a right is not the work and the wage the
credit, the credit is a business that should serve to two parts, to which
requests it to make something that interests him for its improvement of life,
and to the one that gives it to win something and to make business, but it is
not any right for god love.
I am really
very concerned with these perspectives, I am not able to neither to imagine
that Spain waits for us if it really governs PODEMOS, sew that I don't discard
because that that also and certain it is that today, neither the PP makes it,
neither I see under conditions to the PSOE of making it, with this future I
don't know what to tell them but the most approximate thing is that if there
are not substantial changes in the politics of this country, we go from head to
a Spain governed under a communist social system where the society will live
again off what the government distributes that will be the little work, the
little salary, the little sanity, the fair education, the pensions of charity,
and the involution of Spain.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario