We have to change, we cannot continue anchored in the old customs for
very effective that have been, it arrives a moment that for circumstances
unaware to our will the things even, change and we should change with them, the
first thing that we have to think is that here nothing else won't be that our
own time of life, therefore we cannot cling to our customs or beliefs and we
don't have to be afraid to the changes because maybe we don't live them.
The economic situation partner and politics that he has played us to
live now, require a total turn that it is safe, it is clear that to continue
making the things equal as up to now it doesn't work, the causes are countless,
the immigration, the European union, the autonomies, the technology, the
industrial globalization, the politicians in excess, the fourth to be able to
without control some, the third world that has become the first one, everything
influences; the consequences, we don't have work for all and the one that there
is different, we cannot hope dad pays us well the to be, enough will make if he
administers us with good sense and justness, in a word, I are finished our
scenario and we have to act otherwise.
One of the first things that I mean the Spaniards, it is that not alone
we have to lose the fear to the privatization but rather we must demand it
urgently, because it is necessary to change the main mark of the society that
is the political government in excess, the privatizations they bear some without
adjustments, but the advantages to the long one, they are many for the society,
the first one although it seems like it is that it removes him to be able to
the politicians, thing of which know a lot in Spain, the main company of the
country is the state in all its slopes and that can no longer continue among
other things because it is in absolute crash.
Examples are to privatize the railroads, they know you that the RENFE
and ADIF prepare of more budget and personal that many ministries, they have
been given for informed of the useless AVE that have built. It is necessary to
privatize the airports physically and in their administration, you know the
airports without flights neither passengers that have been built. It is
necessary to privatize the ports; you know the expenses that bear some ports
that alone they stay because an official entity that he calls himself
"Ports of the State" exists.
It is necessary to privatize the TV, when the government loves us
something that rents the time that he needs in commercial and private
televisions and he says it, after he is devoted to govern and not to spend
money in having a good time pardon I meant to influence us, we will already
make it us alone. And I have left for the end of the chapter, the fattest thing
is to privatize the infrastructures and the sanitary administration, I have not
said the Social Security that is another thing and this if it should be a
public service. The how to make it is another topic that another day we will
play.
And for I finish at the moment and until we regulate the national
demography, it is necessary to work less so that they can work more, to me it
has always missed me that the unions have in this respect so little that to
say, rather alone they have to say that we will pay general or partial strike
the attention it depends, but they don't outline changes labor, new forms of
working and of using, it doesn't stop them everything should follow the manager
equally he steals to the worker and the worker steals to the manager.
This is their contribution to the modern society, and this cannot be
this way for always, now that there is so much unemployment because there is
little work, it is obvious that he would be necessary to work less, it is
logical not, because he doesn't think about the labor day of 30 weekly hours,
this is a little more than 20% less than the current one, it seems logical that
if we have 20 unemployment% and let us believe a hole of same size, equal would
fit many workers they don't find it, Because 30 hours, because it is necessary
that daily the schedule is multiple of the 24 hours for the shifts that have to
square.
The thing this in knowing how to negotiate this with the companies, the
workers, and the government, so that the economic effects are adjusted among
all, evidently the worker cannot pass to charge 20% less, but for sure
something less if, because in many cases they would work the couple or a son
that now it is in unemployment etc. and let us don't say of the possibility of
reconciling the time free, less kangaroos, less charwomen, more power to go to
the market, time to eat, less expense in restaurants, etc.
The manager would be amazed that possibly the yield the productivity
would not lower 20%, as a lot among 8/10%, for that reason it would continue
there being unemployment but the one calls him logical 8/10%, this is not a
story it is proven that the efficiency stays very much better in a short space
of time that in longer days, and lastly the government should adjust the
worker's tax part and of the company or so that the salary result and of costs,
it was assumable for both parts.
Certainly the unions would also should of stopping to interfere in
topics of labor schedules, mainly in the commercial schedule the companies, and
the trade should have the freedom of opening so much and as they want, to be
able to make variable of personal as weekend insoles, with application of run
shifts, or workers that always prefer to work Saturdays and Sundays, and clear
in works that allow it or they require it, hear them I assure that there are a
lot of people that if can win enough working two days, it stops then for
example, to paint, to write, to study, they would make it.
The topics enunciated serious easy question are very already explained
to apply them I assure it to him and the exchange society to better an
atrocity, let us remove to the state what is not of the state, and let us give
the work and the profitability to the society that he/she administers it to him
efficiently and responsibly they don't find.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario