MI SURPRISE BEFORE AN ARTICULATE IN PRESS GIVING EXPLANATIONS ON A POSSIBLE SECESSION

  

- "The president of the European Commission, José Manuel Durao Barroso, he has left clear that in the case of a hypothetical secession on behalf of the territory of a state member would have to negotiate an agreement solution with the international legislation so that the citizens of the freed territory maintain the European citizenship that is complementary but it doesn't substitute to the national one, according to the Treaty of Operation of the European" Union -. I imagine that this news this taken out of context to not give explanations requested by anybody, at the moment. 

This paragraph is as absurd as the columnist's intention that agreed to publish it I suppose ennobled by the Spanish national more right-wing part that takes out tip before catching the pencil against the possible intention of Catalonia of getting the secession of the group of the current Spain, we will see, in the supposition that we speak of Catalonia if there is a secession the inhabitants of Catalonia, they will be Catalan, neither Spaniards by no means “European unionist”, this last it will follow an annexation process like they are making it countries like Bulgaria or Rumania etc., but this is another thing. It is so from common sense that makes frankly bad to the eyes to read opinions like he said before not requested by anybody.  

In the hypothetical case of a secession of a part of a State member, the solution would have to be and to be negotiated, inside the legal classification among the own state, the secessionist part, and the international right, this is the road if it is a secession requested by peaceful beds, and framed inside the international legality. The in route to a secession can be as complicated as the dominant nation he wants to oppose, but today in day before an international court there is not another solution to the problem, a firm segregation decision, is practically impossible of hindering, if the part interested salvo one to one, the bureaucratic and legal impediments that will impose him from the totalitarian state and the international court. 

Before the firm segregation purpose, today it cannot oppose himself the force, this action would bear the international intervention, in form of sanctions of administrative political type, of trade or financial, to the initiator of the actions of force or both if was this the case, in the democracy of the century 21 cannot put under an obligation to be somebody what is not wanted to be. 

Another thing is the complexity of the physical act of segregation of territories it is evident that the most difficult point is to value the elements of physical infrastructures that should be valued to know the paying-off grade that should be compensated on the part of the territory separatist when becoming the absolute proprietor of the dependent infrastructures formerly of the central state, the establishment of people in the new territory before the new dependence it is not a problem of relevance but if moral and affective, although that for the same international law people could choose between to remain in the new country or to return to that of origin, in a same way the companies and established business would proceed. 

Frankly I was surprised to read yesterday an article in a Spanish newspaper on the hypothetical calamities and almost impossibilities of a segregation, in a moment that nobody has requested it in Spain, this is like an invitation to make it on the part of I don't know very well that Spanish nationalist groups, I would tell them that they don't worry before time although it is well that they are informed, and in this case makes it better because the incongruity of the article, (made without a doubt of manifestations and caught parts in way it " it copies and adds"), it was lamentable.