AT THE END WE WILL ACCEPT FOR GOOD WHAT IS NOT IT

 

The society in general would have to react it cannot be that some few ones powerful and corrupt, they can dominate to an entire social mass that you go like it loses its basic conditions of life and he is not made neither I marry and it won't be because he doesn't protest because if he makes it now then the system that the powerful minority has mounted it is rather one of the swindles concocted of the humanity's history. 

The power has transformed the Democracy, the law of fairer basic coexistence that the history believes with the help of lived hard experiences and suffering on its backs, what was the liberation of the mankind destroying the tyrannies exercised by noblemen and religions in principle was able to change the world taking it to the modernity he made it creative it allowed to apply the justice to all, I finish with the slavery, with the differences by reason of sex, I educate and I heal all without looking that social class came, in short the democracy change the world  

To where I take us this system I don't believe necessary to stress it more because most of those that we are living today in the world has lived him and enjoyed although some more than other and for more time. All this to that he comes my readers wondered, because all this comes because I believe that we are giving march to after the democracy he has opened the way to the “Politocracia” and this in turn has been entangled in the economic materialism leaving to a side the socialization of the basic rights of survival. 

Today we can know that 10,8% of the Spaniards doesn't arrive in order to month and they have to appeal to loans in a habitual way. Most appeals their relatives first, but they also manifest to request credit cards or personal loans to be able to pay all their expenses paying for it some costs that many times take them to lose their tranquility their rights and their tranquility. 

According to accusation a study on the 'the consumers' of the communities Situation especially be protected and of the consumers of more age' elaborated by Adicae, 40,2% of the Spaniards doesn't have saving capacity some and other 13,8% it presents occasional saving of less than a hundred monthly Eurus.  Of all these, 31,6% attests not to arrive in order to month in an occasional way or in a permanent way. The study also reveals that 17% of the citizens is in risk of having to appeal to the indebtedness in a habitual way. 

The same report reveals that the population's fourth part can only consider that he has a capacity of stable and guaranteed saving. Other 57,8% recognizes that if he has to confront some extra expense or some non-ordinary purchase, it postpones that payment and it saves until he/she can make it, appealing to the alone financial credit if it is indispensable.  

According to Adicae, 65% of those smaller than 35 years doesn't save anything, percentage that rises to 84% among the unemployed. Among the immigrant community, 35% of those interviewed doesn't have saving capacity, while a prominent 50% is able to separate up to a hundred monthly Eurus. 

The study reveals that the habits of the grown-ups' saving are highly influenced by the family responsibilities of those that should be taken charge. 35% of those bigger than 60 years confirms that it cannot save in order to month, and other 12% it separates less than a hundred Eurus, but this community is the one that is able since to dedicate more part from its revenues to the saving 40% of all they are able to separate between 300 and 600 Eurus a month. 

I believe that the democracy didn't outline this situation I believe that the democracy you forms to avoid these situations of misery of dependence of social imbalances in short I believe that we are confusing the terms the politics, the state, the laws and the rights, they are not to favor to the economy to the politics and the politicians. 

The democracy is so that the town the society, the family the man the woman the boy and the girls have the same basic rights and the same basic security that the politicians and the rich ones, starting from that the democracy allows that one can have and to possess more some that other but what cannot be is that to get this last others have to lose their basic rights.