Difficult zeal the one that I intend to develop in this article wanted to put in undoubtedly he plays us to live a time change, that clear and that disconcerting. Every century it has possibly represented a change or two in way of life or as much as less than focusing the life of people that we inhabit our earth great town the one that welcomes us and where we have to habituate ourselves according to the human parameters of those that come, parameters that transmit them to us our parents, our adults, our beliefs and our own trial, and the hardest thing later plays us to carry out this transmission to those that we have put in this world.
We are at temporary level beginning a new alone century we take with him 15 years this is not anything I believe that we have to consider that we have left a lot to still make so that this century he/she leaves it doesn't unite but many prints to those that must come later and to those that will still be able to him to see, they will see it and they studied it in next coming centuries and the first thing that will say it will be: "How they accelerated the changes in the XXI" century. Because that that one century behind took in the whole century to happen, today spends in one decade.
I believe that this century it began too well occident the it was floating well in the economic wealth to be social, Asia with China to the head was in progress changing its system of life toward an industrialization of success and the other ethnic groups or continents or ethnics continued stable and without realizing turn very quickly, the crisis appeared there for June of the 2007.
To explain to it another time is not the reason of this I articulate all we know that what we didn't know happen it is the change that will represent for many of us and here the question begins the first thing it is that the crisis attacks fundamentally to the western society, logical era was the one that I believe it and to who effect of full and stronger, because we came from a situation of great economic peak and with a limitless arrogance.
Little less than we had created the change of the world there was globalized the work and with it the globalizer possibility the economy and the resources energy etc. In few words wanted to change the poverty of great part of the world for the possibility of a better life, according to our parameters naturally that is to say wealth and freedom.
But we realized late that in fact we had not made it for altruism, but for an ambition and a speculation of the world free capitalist and democratic of occident, this in fact thought not of improving to other societies but in taking out them profit to get rich more and more quickly, that was the idea that I take to the globalization and this brought the crisis because occident lost the creation of wealth by means of the work and the production of consumption goods, passing over them to other much poorer societies and that for some costs a hundred times inferior would make the same thing that until then toward the rich world that is to say occident.
But he didn't keep in mind two things one that their selfishness made that even costing the things a hundred times less, the western economies didn't reflect it in their consumption markets, so the markets continued valuing the factories to the same sale price as if they manufactured them in their industries with their workers, workers that no longer worked and factories that no longer took place. It happened this way that at the little time instead of producing things had to produce money to be able to maintain the consumption of the western economies but that yes, without industrial base and this way you make the unbalance of the economy.
And everything began this way increments of value they were created on anything, without any real back, now I remind Alan's Greenspan sentence - the irrational values - referring to the stock markets of USA, that was what I happen we made an IRRATIONALITY. Which are paying today in day, this irrationality unbalances that certain and that hard world, mainly for those that we made the irrationality.
The problem that he has suggested me this article is consequence of this long exhibition in fact all this step in a scarce 30 year-old margin 15 of last XX century and the 15 that we begin of this XXI one it is more the real disaster that is to say when we gave ourselves of downwards with the consequence of our irrationality he makes so alone seven. And with the result that he can say that without a doubt we are still in "State of Shock", and this it is the state that we should overcome quickly because otherwise the changes that are approached can be disastrous.
Economically the world has given a turn of 180 grades the wealth this today advancing totally from south to north contrary to the XX century. Demographically the migratory disaster still goes to unbalance more the economies the phenomenon is interesting of studying they will see because. Apart from the economic question the geopolitical question exists, in the one that the poor, basically Arab and African world, is the last rampart where the frontier is marked between the rich world of the south and that of the north.
They also join in him a lot of religious confusion and of governments tyrants that make the life of their society so much so a true hell that none of the two rich worlds that today exists wants globalizers because they don't trust some of the other ones, however this world says poor and not well treaty understands that the wealth is still in the north, evidently this has been this way for many centuries, they also have very unpleasant memories of the towns of the north that I colonize them, I enslave them, the abuse, of this doesn't make a lot but of two centuries.
Very now he has stayed amid the two evolutions the rich North and the South that he doesn't know neither he fears him neither he has him any bill to charge a current migratory double so an it has been created in good faith because the decontrol of its own world forces them to escape from him and other, because there are a very studied subversive politics and very extremist conqueror that he has as clear objective to unbalance the north, in this case Europe, conclusion meets with a hard economic crisis without industrial resources to overcome it with millions of unemployed and with already millions of immigrants among those that there are soldiers terrorists and suicides.
This is the scenario in that we are and I eat consequence we are being defeated by the circumstances that ourselves believes, we drop economies we drop the democracy they appear us political of communist character, we are to a step of breaking the unit of the euro, and we don't know that we have to make this it is field paid for other political or economic cultures the clearest case it is Russia that has decided to begin a cool war (at the moment) to see that it takes out of profit and it can take out a lot, Greece is very close. Spain goes on the way to politics’ of communist character change, in short I believe that it is necessary to change plans as soon as possible, it is necessary to leave the defeat attitude and to take that of fighters, or it doesn't fit them doubt, we won't leave our successors a free and rich world, but just the opposite.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario