THE EUROPEANS AND THE EURO ESCEPTIC ARE BOTH EUROPEANS

Now the question is to discuss if you are Europeans or euro esceptics, but I don't worry about that because that that in the bottom, it means it is that you are European, it is the same thing that to say who is more democratic the one that is of left or the one that is of right, in all ways in the comments that I read in the press concerning the europeísmo what I find to see, is if you are consequent and brave with the taken decisions or on the contrary, you are afraid the hardness of the same ones. In the first supposition you are Europeans in the second Euro escéptic I believe that but I eat self-defense just in case they fail.  

The bet is made. Before he swims her, the jump ahead toward a narrower " Super Union ", the community leaders have opted for more Europe. But in the trip that they have before yes, they won't have the support of all their public opinion at the moment. It is logical we are not under conditions of being happy of any immediate achievement, what has started is a short and arduous road that he forced there to so much many sacrifices of material nature as philosophical and political it is anything, to restructure an Europe without the United Kingdom, and with the loss of national power that represents not to be owner of your money, but it is that this is the main advance, because it is clear that they have been the own European national governments those that have wasted their resources happily thinking that the whole mount was oregano.  

In the manifestations that these last months, the European capitals have traveled in protest for the cuttings and the unemployment from Athens to Lisbon going by Brussels, every time they blunt more proclaims against Europe. For many, the European institutions are as perfidious as the International Monetary Fund, classic target of the angers in this type of protests. And this is induced by the own politicians that have been denounced by the crash of their economy, any country of those ruined the they have been for the IMF, they have been it for their own governments that have deceived to their society to obtain their votes for each election, and it is now when the IMF and the BCE and the European commission come to put them in waist, but not before in any case they were those of the IMF or those of the BCE, to tell them come it spends what you don't have, he deceives to your town, retire it at the 50 years old, if you don't have industry he gives same you make them officials of the state etc. 

The financial and economic crisis has changed everything. He has forced to make drastic and historical decisions, as leaving behind to the United Kingdom. The social climate will be adverse, but the European rulers have been convinced that there is not more option than to bet for more Europe and to have to assume new surrenders of sovereignty. Europe is not able to alone. It is "urgent. The world won't wait Europe", expressed the French president, Nicolás Sarkozy, to the rest of the European leaders last week, in a speech in Toulon. "If Europe doesn't change quickly, the history will be written without her.  

It is the conviction of France and Germany", the French leader emphasized, and it is the only exit for a European Union that indeed this staggering and it is necessary to bolster at any cost. The principle foundational of that new Europe is a bigger budgetary integration, with more discipline and more solidarity, although this last point is still to be defined. It implies to give a new environment of national sovereignty to Brussels. First it was the monetary one, with the creation of the European Central Bank and the euro, and shortly it will be the budgetary one, giving vote to Europe in the national bills. 

After summing up this, the following step that will be the process of economic reactivation of the union will come they don't doubt it, you cannot begin a house with the roof it is necessary to assure the foundations and these until last day 9, they were not under conditions of supporting anything. To complete the work of the parents founders and to correct "the lagoons" that the crisis has shown in the monetary union, it is the task that Europe, (a new Europe without the United Kingdom) he has to confront starting from now, and these lagoons are: the budgetary and fiscal imbalance that you accent in hands of each member I suppose that from necessity in their beginnings, and also for trust in the practical sense of the governments, in administering their economies. And the other lagoon is finding a balance but rational of the distribution of the sources of wealth and productivity of the European Union in its entire group. 

There are several temptations to build that Europe. France and Germany take years criticizing the limits of the call method community method. The decisions on any aspect that doesn't surpass the strict ones to the administration would say internal of the organs of government of the own union, they work to a good rhythm, but when the resolutions owe being of general environment and they affect the politicians and national governments, they are frankly a lottery with the added difficulty of having 27 variables that each one goes to their rhythm, and that nobody makes sure that at the end there is prize, so the community institutions could propose a more intergovernmental focus that up to now single France and Germany come years defending. 

The small countries, on the other hand, prefer to maintain the classic method for not being suffocated by the franc-German axis, mainly now that he has been left without the counterbalance of London. Merkel has given opening signs in this sense and in the summit of Brussels they didn't lack the promises of implying at the maximum level to the European Commission and the Euro camera. But the intergovernmental temptation is big and old, and it disturbs the more federalists, however they don't doubt it, nationalized or non Europe has to move in a single address, to a single order, and to a single reaction speed. The rest of the world works this way and like Sarkozy said they won't wait for us.  

In definitive and I eat colophon, it is necessary to be optimistic, and to see the things without so much pessimist in the bottom all you criticize them all the efforts of some and others don't stop to strengthen the main idea, like he told the holder my article, “Europeístas” or “Euroescéptics” they discuss and they work to model an EUROPEAN UNION, then that but he gives the form the important thing it is the end and the end is the same one there is not another EUROPE.