domingo, 7 de agosto de 2011

SOME IDEAS OF ECONOMY FOR OUR LEADERS

"The European leaders avoid an encounter to approach the crisis." The different reactions of the presidencies and government's cabinets demonstrate that there is not a common solution in Europe. Most of bosses of State and of Government they are on vacation and they communicate for telephone, but none of the leaders of G-7 wants to take a step ahead for it turns in this month of August. The newspaper Hulls Him, in its edition of this weekend, it mentions to an anonymous source that follows the negotiations for French part and he reveals: "At the moment, we don't have the solution."

Fantastic but good as he already knew it I don't plan to stay as them stopped and afraid and I will venture to give some ideas that can open the way to effective solutions:

1º.- It is necessary to define as soon as possible if Europe continues or I don't eat European Union or simply as Continent.

2º.- It is necessary to define independently of the resolution of the point first of the one who belongs the money that is used where is, to the government, of the central bank, of the society etc.

3º.- It is necessary to forget the economic recipes to the use you must put an end to the fear to the inflation, this is an invention of the speculators, but it is a natural effect that is regulated alone controlling the prices.

4º.- One is not able to in time of crisis to govern clipping revenues on the contrary it is necessary to go up bad taxes that in spite of all. They already descend again when the budget is balanced.

5º.- The cost of the money should commit to the PIB of each country or area of use of the money the investor, the manager the society cannot be to expenses of the shift agent's humor and of its ideas.

6º.- It is necessary to clarify who the winner is among the economic war among Chinese and USA and consequently among the western or oriental economy.

Very once enumerated those enunciated, I pass to carry out a small development of each one to define their meaning and repercussion well about the economy he practices.

The first point is essential Europe is not able to maintain the disparity of its nations and at the same time to seek to be an union of interests is unviable, he should decide or a thing or other, my serious proposal to create a Federal Europe to which you/they unite the nations that they choose this way it freely and be willing to lose its sovereignty and nationalism, if there is not enough answer that allows to create a sufficiently important block to forget the question. As it happened with USA they will be able to adhere to new nations that they have not wanted for what is in a principle or don't have been admitted by the federation the adhesion it should never be forced in any sense, because in principle it should be irreversible.

Second point the money the foreign currencies this is a true disaster it is necessary to settle down of who is the money or said in another way who governs it and who he gives him the value or I eat it cannot be like one has seen now that the currency but tiny Yuan 0,15 cents of Dollar eats up the economy of the Dollar or the Dollar is not worth anything or Yuan it is worth an atrocity in fact and they have been deceiving us as Chinese who is responsible for this nobody the money it is a paper that each one prints and he doesn't have relationship some with he is concrete no matter how much the economies say that yes. The money cannot continue being him arms political as up to now.

Third point is to forget the economic recipes to the use, terms like inflation and recession they are merely elements false and speculative that alone they should interpret as isolated consequent facts to fleeting situations and they should not be used as governments of an economic politics form as he is making BCE, if there is inflation it is because there is not control of prices, and there is peacefulness in the economy that allows to support it, to go up the interests to brake the economy to finish with the inflation it is to finish with the two things and with the productivity, it is necessary to look for the control of prices and not the control of the consumption, I give had discounted that he understands each other a reasoned consumption and rational. For that they are the rulers to intervene, to fix rules of behavior margins of benefits and he doesn't stop to make the problems and demanders from all type to the society.

The fourth point is the most delicate but it is this way, you cannot govern a crisis clipping single costs and benefits to the society, in these situations what it is necessary to make is to impose indirect strong taxes to the capital, to stagger the IVA so that the products deluxe and high price quotes but and the less essentials, taxes to the capital if he moves to speculate and in the benefits that he not takes place bound to the investment and the work, and on the contrary to disencumber strongly if the capital is invested in taking place in investigation and development, to stagger the taxes on the company benefit and banks to but benefits more% of taxes in relation to the% of benefit the taxes should never be fixed they should always go in consonance with what is sought to impute.

The fifth point is vital for the development of the general economy as marking the cost of the money and I refer to the interests that the banks should get paid for we lend them that they carry out as facilitators of fuel for the society and the companies, it cannot be that he cannot buy me a house if not you what it mortgages interests I will have and I am not able to as manager to request a credit or a financing line if neither it is given that humor will rise the banks tomorrow, this is easy to solve, they will see the money it should cost and to be rewarded, to the level of the percentage of the PIB of the country or area that it is more an established percentage for example 0,5% this way everybody knows that its loan will cost him and for consequence to be able to make forecasts and plans to future that my country or area goes very well and the GDP this in 3% I found difficult my credits 3,5% and my deposits will give me 3,5% and I won't get scared because if the country has this high percentage of growth he means this that me also that the PIB is 0 or. -0 because I will always pay 0,5% pro anger not adjusted with the economic reality by what speculates a gentleman or an entity.

And lastly it is necessary to establish the situation and the balance of the international trade and if a society doesn't want it or it doesn't complete it, it is necessary to be hard and to reject to market with her, it doesn't pass anything to the long it will give he won't have more remedy already nobody he can go so for its bill in this world the decision of who conquers between the war of USA and China on the economic supremacy of the world, it is necessary to decide it as soon as possible and if there is better tie.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario