At the end of January,
the agency of Standard rating & Poor's reduced the qualification from
Russia to "voucher garbage"; now he has played him the shift to
Moody's, even so, the funds, as the actions and the ruble have experienced a
turnaround so much, although this doesn't mean that there are not enough
reasons for the caution. The agency clipped the Russian sovereign note to
"Ba1", the first step of the category "garbage", with
negative perspective. Now that two of the three main rating agencies have
reduced the qualification of Russia below the investment grade, the most
conservative investors will avoid to buy debt of the country.
Most of the reasons of
the discount are more than enough well-known: the crisis of Ukraine, the fall
of the prices of the raw one and the collapse of the ruble, factors that
represent a serious threat to the Russian economy and their financial sector,
affected by the sanctions. Moody's also worries about it that, as a result of
the tensions with Ukraine, Russia adopts a decision that "affects to the
payment of its foreign" debt. Although the qualification agency believes
that this risk is still "very low", in its opinion he goes in
increase. In spite of this situation, surprisingly February has been an
excellent month for the forks of Russian assets, although there was a light
setback after being known the discount of the rating of the country.
And it is that there is
no way to change the distrust of Russia in front of the western world, Russia
and United States they crossed this Monday you last accusations in the Council
of Security of the United Nations, gathered in a special session with reason of
the 70 anniversary of the organization. In spite of the fact that the objective
of the debate was to reaffirm the commitment of the international community
with the principles of the UN, the tensions that Moscow and Washington live
soon after conflicts like those of Syria and Ukraine ended up dominating the
appointment.
The Russian minister of
External, Serguéi Lavrov, got the attention on the recurrent violations of the
bases settled down in the Letter of the United Nations, among them those that
point out the independence and sovereignty of the States and the noninterference
in the internal matters. "Coarse with reminding the bombings Serbia, the
occupation of low Iraq it has more than enough a reinforcement pretext (...)
and the rude manipulation of the command of the Council of Security that has
taken to the destruction and the chaos in Libya", Lavrov said.
For the Russian
minister that avoided to refer directly to USA, all those movements are
"been of an intent of dominating the international matters, of sending on
all". In the case of the countries that they resist to that domain, Lavrov
assured, it is looked for to "encourage the interior disorder and the
régime" change, something that became evident in its opinion with the
"support to the coup d'etat in Ukraine". The effrontery of Lavrrov is
the image in the way of acting of the government of Putin it is to look for the
justification to themselves that they should be it opposed to the civilized
forms of most of the world more concerned today for the economy that for the
wars
It is evident as always
I say that this is a way to be able to hide the reality of Russia. As I tell
them Russia he always is not able to, to maintain so much military expense as
he wants to present to be valued for example as the USA and the NATO, to Russia
he doesn't give him the desire of recognizing that behind the USA and the NATO
is some economies of almost a thousand million inhabitants while alone Russia
is 135 million, and instead of uniting to them he begins to criticize and to
threaten and to an economic and military social political organization that is
almost ten times adult that her.
Clear it immediately
also criticized difficultly the imposition of unilateral" "sanctions,
without green light of the United Nations, as those adopted by USA and the
European Union against their country soon after the Ukrainian crisis. Lavrov
denounced, in that sense, the intents to transform the Council of Security of
the UN into an organism that simply approves the guidelines of a
"leader" or that, directly, stay undoubtedly to the margin of the
decisions I don't mention that Russia also tries to put sanctions but at the
end it is that they become on its own society.
Lavrov has insisted in
that the Council of Security should be reformed to recover the paper that used
to have. We "see that a necessity exists of taking measures in combined
form to eliminate the international politics’ moral double and to take to the
Council of Security to occupy the paper of an institution leader that there are
solutions based on the respect", again it has pointed. But this is
impossible while vetoes are accepted in this organism because with them and
being Russia a country with right to veto is impossible to understand each
other because Russia or the advice of security should be democratic that is to
say to not be governed by most of VOTES by the minority of VETOES
In answer, the American
ambassador before the United Nations, Samantha Power, assured that if the
Council of Security has not assumed its responsibilities in many occasions it
has in fact been for the vetoes, as those exercised by Russia before numerous
initiatives to try to respond to the war in Syria. Power also referred to the
situation in Ukraine and it accused Moscow of training, to arm and to fight
next to the separatists, violating the sovereignty and the territorial integrity
of the neighboring country. The British ambassador, Mark Lyall Grant, denounced
the illegal "annexation of Crimea and the destabilization of
oriental" Ukraine for Russian part as example of the threats for the peace
and the security that persist in the world.
The session, in which
several minister participated, it was summoned by China who regular of External,
Wang Yi, has requested the end of the "confrontation" mentality and a
new one was based on the cooperation among the nations. That different attitude
like one notices that Chinese is thousands of millions she is the leader from
Asia and he is much more determined in the economy that not in the war because is
not necessary him any to use the armies because already scares with her economy
this is the difference that Russia doesn't want to understand.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario