Difficult zeal the one that I
intend to develop in this article. In fact he wanted to put in undoubtedly he
possibly plays us to live a time change, and I imagine that every so often to
the human beings he plays them to live there that clear and that disconcerting
time change. Every century it has possibly represented more than a change in
way of life or as much as less than focusing the life of people that we inhabit
the earth, our great town the one that welcomes us and where have to habituate
ourselves according to the parameters that surround us adjusting them with the
best syntony of those that we come. Parameters that transmit them to us our
parents, our adults, our beliefs and our own trial, and the hardest thing is
that later he plays us to carry out this transmission to those that we have put
in this world.
We are at temporary level
beginning a new alone century we take with him 15 years, this is not anything,
I believe that we have to consider that we have left a lot to still make so
that this century he leaves their prints to those that must come and to those
that observed it and they studied in next coming centuries. I believe that this
century it began too well, this is normal not because it is the principle of
the century but because it is the end of the past this fact it is important the
centuries they work all same one it is curious we can say that they are divided
in three thirds the first third they begin relatively bad they worsen and they
recover in the second third and finally they recover and they are stabilized in
the third and then the following one arrives and the cycle begins again.
Sociologically the humanity
reacts this way since she is humanity, the effect he is curious because is a paradox
that repeats the century is finishes well because she has been 100 years old to
outline the technological changes, to be redoes of the wars and the
catastrophes and finally is in her best moment, we are in the last tract and I
believe that the humanity thinks - good we have already made now everything we
wait to next century to change the things as if was an obligation and this is
this way now we are in the first third and we are trying to change everything
and we are creating this way a problem after another.
At the end of the century 20.
West was floating well in the economic wealth and the to be social, Asia with
China to the head was in progress changing its system of life toward an
industrialization of success and the other ethnic groups or continents or ethnos
continued stable and without realizing all turn very quickly, the crisis
appeared there for June of the 2007. To explain to it another time is not the
reason of this I articulate all we know that what we didn't know happen it is
the change that will represent for many of us and here the question
begins.
The first thing is that the
crisis attacks fundamentally to the western society, logical era was who
believe it and to who I effect of full and stronger because we came from a
situation of great economic peak and with a limitless arrogance. Little less
than we had created the change of the world there was globalized the work and
with it the possibility to change the poverty of great part of the world for
the possibility of a better life, according to our parameters naturally that is
to say consumption, wealth and freedom.
But we didn't want to realize
that in fact we had not made it for altruism, but for an ambition and a
speculation limitless. The free and democratic capitalist world of occident not thought
of improving to other societies but in taking out them profit to get rich more
and with less work that was the globalization and this was seen already come in
the ends of the century 20, but I eat he told them before the humanity he
thought, we will already fix it next century. In fact and to make it easier it
is the same thing that spends in a normal year in all we, make the same thing
one year after another we put an end it to parties and waste, even knowingly
that the things don't go us well or they don't go us like we wanted, but we
think, good now it is Christmas I will already fix it next year it is this way
or not.
This century principle brought
this way the crisis and occident lost the creation of wealth passing over it to
other much poorer societies and that for some costs a hundred times inferior
would make the same thing that until then toward the rich world that is to say
occident. But he didn't keep in mind two things one that their selfishness made
that even costing the things a hundred times less, the western economies didn't
reflect it in their consumption markets, so the markets continued valuing the
factories to the same sale price as if they manufactured them in their
industries with their workers and their costs, it happened this way that at the
little time instead of producing things had to produce money to be able to
maintain the western economies but this is making it without base any
industrial base because last century we pass over it to us and you make the I
unbalance of the economy.
Everything began this way
increments of value they were created on anything, without any real back, I
remind Alan's sentence now Greenspan - the irrational values - referring to the
stock markets of USA, that happens we made an irrationality. Which we are
paying today in day this irrationality unbalances that real and that hard world
mainly for those that we made the error. The problem that he has suggested me
this article is consequence of this long exhibition in fact all this step in a
scarce 45 year-old margin 30 of last XX century and the 15 that we begin of
this XXI one.
It is more, the real disaster
that is to say when we gave ourselves of downwards with the consequence of our
irrationality he makes so alone seven. And with the result that he can say that
without a doubt we are still in "State of Shock", and this it is the
state that we should overcome quickly because otherwise the changes that are
approached can be disastrous. Economically the world has given a turn of 180
grades the wealth this today advancing from south to north.
Demographically the migratory
disaster still goes to des composer more the economies, the phenomenon is
interesting of studying they will see because: Apart from the geopolitical
question, in the one that the poor, basically Arab and African world, is a lot
of religious confusion and of government, this world he understands that the
wealth is in the north, it is what has seen and they have counted him during
centuries its ancestors, evidently this has been this way for many centuries,
he also has very unpleasant memories of the towns of the north that I colonize
them, I enslave them, the abuse, of this doesn't make a lot more than two
centuries.
Very now he has stayed amid
the two evolutions the rich North and the South that it is also already rich
but that he doesn't know neither he fears him neither he has him any bill to
get paid, so a current migratory double as has been created in good faith
because the without control of its own world forces them to escape from him and other,
because there are a very studied subversive politics and very extremist
conqueror that he has as clear objective to unbalance the north, in this case
Europe, so like he says the proverb to thin "dog everything they are
fleas", conclusion, we meet with a hard economic crisis, without
industrial resources to overcome it, with millions of unemployed and with
already millions of immigrants, among those that there are also soldiers
terrorists and suicides.
This is the scenario in that
we are and I eat consequence we are defeated, we drop economies we drop the
democracy, they appear us political of populist character - communist, we are
to a step of breaking the unit of the euro, and we don't know that we have to
make this it is field paid for other political or economic cultures, the
clearest case is Russia that has decided to begin a Cool War (at the moment) to
see that it takes out of profit and it can take out a lot, Greece is very
close. Spain goes on the way to a change of politics of extremist character of
left, in short I believe that it is necessary to change attitude as soon as
possible it is necessary to leave the defeat attitude and to take that of
fighters, or it doesn't fit them doubt, we won't leave our successors a free
and rich world, but just the opposite.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario