THE ISLAMISM IS A PROBLEM OF THE MUSLIMS THAT THEY SEEK THAT WE PAY US THE BLAMES

Difficult very difficult to enter in this uncompromising crazy world and outside of control that is the Integrismo Islamic or yihadistas if they prefer we can put him to it the name that they want at the end it is the Islam what is behind, we can crumble what contains this definition the practice of the Islam a little he becomes the Islamism religious type and the “political Islam” this he believes a heterogeneous group of political movements, (that could compare them to ours right left socialists communist republican etc.) whose ideology and program politician consists essentially on the adaptation from the political life to the religious commands of the Islam. 

The religious Islamism is the "group of dogmas and moral precepts that constitute Mohammed's" religion; while "Islamite" is what becomes or he hugs the Muslim" integrismo. in any event, he should not made a mistake the "Islamic thing or Muslim" (terms that designate to all the relative one to the Islam) with the "Islamite" inside the Islamic thing is possible "traditional" Muslim being or "conservative" without being Islamite, and vice versa since are terms that refer in principle to the customs and traditional Islamic cultures  

Today for the events that you happens the stigma it has been pronounced that supposes to identify as a whole political Islam with the Islamic terrorism or jihads. But it is that it is unavoidable that it happens this way, because those that we qualify this way him are of other beliefs and cultures where the religious conditions have been abolished completely and concentrated to the personal environment. 

In our culture it would be unthinkable that a Catholic religious leader makes some manifestations like those that a leader of the arm Yemeni has carried out of To the Qaeda when he said in an audio one that the attack in France was carried out for the attacks against the prophets, and it ended up being attributed the responsibility by the slaughter in the offices of the weekly magazine Charlie Hebdo, and he added in the audio one published on Friday in YouTube that the attackers were some welded "fervor of God" that they taught the French the limits of the freedom of speech. 

And this is as well as they think it is not necessary to remove iron to what is happening we are not in some such terrorist actions and like I exposed in my previous comment of some days ago in this respect of the attacks in Paris the situation is of an invasion war and expansion of an absolutist religious culture and radicalized to the maximum against another culture ours to the one that they accuse her of the wrongs that its societies only suffer for cause of the radicalization of these radical islamistas for their interests that that if it is certain, their main victims (at the moment) they are its own race. 

I am not me alone who see this way it today in a small official statement, Soarkozy has affirmed that "the barbarians have declared "the war to France", to the Republic and their institutions". Some barbarians, it follows the former president saying that they "deny the same idea of civilization and the humanity's" universal values. For this reason, Sarkozy has pointed out that "this tragic situation calls us to respect the unit that we owe our victims." 

Sarkozy added: "the nation is sad once again for the death of many of our countrymen. My thoughts are with the victims and the wounded of these terrible attacks and their families. I would like once again to give my support to the Jewish community in France difficultly hit". This is the reality we are not before terrorist lunatics we are before a perfectly organized military position and preparation to attack in way almost impossible of defending previously but that it is vastly lethal and expensive to posteriori with single six soldiers have made twenty you kill and they have put in check to the second nation of Europe, they are necessary them more arguments. 

He doesn't have any justification the barbarism Islamite either the one that they are applied in their own societies or the one that they try to extend in the europa and in the western civilization we don't have any blame that it justifies their ravings their problems of social exclusion they are purely his, they have them in their origin countries, for that reason they escape to thousands and they transport them with them when some escape for fear and necessity and other they send them as camouflaged soldiers, when they arrive to their destinations instead of being integrated they continue confined and remote of the customs and even aspect of their welcome towns, and this in France is clear they already go for the third generation of immigrants and most continues living and dressing and with the appearance just as he/she lived in their origin earth. 

This what it is so evident it rebounds them in everything in the work lack and opportunities in the education and in the social relationship and it is logical but they don't want to understand that they are no longer Arab that they are French and I eat this he is the French they don't consider this way them as such countrymen my question it is who has the blame, the French that are in their country or the Arab that he doesn't give them the desire of making comfortable. I believe that the answer is clear. Anyway here I want to tinge that not the whole blame belongs to the immigrants but rather I believe that it is also it of the receivers, be French, Spaniards, or German and the blame is not another that to let that this happens, the European countries have stopped worrying first and scared later and they have not imposed the forms of life and courtesy, characteristic of the western civilization to their immigrants, here now they have the results.   

The imams of the main mosques of France have condemned this Friday during the sentence of Fridays the violence made on behalf of the Islam, two days after the slaughter in the satirical weekly publication 'Charlie Hebdo', followed by the taking of hostages that the pays. So much has shocked in the capital as in the rest of the country, it was emitted oneself message assisting to the call of the representatives of the Muslim community, formed by about five million members that they had requested to the imams of more than 2.300 mosques that you separate clearly of the yihadistas. 

But this is unfortunately impossible because the yihadistas doesn't take any sign in the forehead saying I am dangerous I am so of the yihad or they are the same Muslims those that reject them and they make themselves an internal cleaning or face to the western society all Muslim it will be seen as a potential member yihadistas because there is not form of differentiating them and this is the advantage that the I exercise of the “Islamic yihad” he takes advantage to organize their attacks against those that consider us unfaithful. 

The representatives of the Muslim community fear that the attack of 'Charlie Hebdo' it causes a resurgence of the aggressions or violent acts against their members. Just yesterday, the first French minister, Manuel Valls, wanted to underline that France was "in war against the terrorism", and not "against a religion", but it is single question of the Muslims I repeat, to separate off among them, the terrorists of those that are not it.