AS SOCIALIZING THE UNEMPLOYMENT THE DEFICIT AND THE REACTIVATION

Is there part of the magic trilogy that Spain needs here but how to make it? This it is the question to which I want to put a possible solution to obtain the three thanks to the time. I have already mentioned that is to say more than an occasion that the unemployment in our country is atypical it is not product of an economic relenting, if not of the disappearance of a real estate bubble, and therefore or let us believe another time the bubble (it sews that besides impossible it is a suicide) or the current industrial fabric will never absorb them. 

 

I have proclaimed the idea of prevailing the repatriation of much immigrant in unemployment, for blame of having been attracted here by the songs of siren of the bubble of the construction in the last decade, neither I marry, the very happy government says in the last surveys that the emigration of Spain overcomes the immigration, but he adds that it is because the immigration practically has disappeared, and the difference is also located in hundred and not in millions like it would be necessary, it also happens an unfavorable fact and it is that who leave of the country they are not in fact the immigrants of the brick, if not the unemployed of the universities, that which neither is favorable. 

 

Well as this it is clear that the government from Spain won't fix it, I will outline a socialization of the unemployment, with the purpose of obtaining three results, to reduce the unemployment to bench marks of 10%, to make that the cost of this operation relapses part on the private capital and I don't publish, and however to increase the consumption with what the initial cost reverts to the private capital getting that if the outlines are completed at the end they recover that invested. 

 

We go to for the position of the topic: in Spain there are 3,5 million companies more or less, here all enter, from the phone one until the tradesman of the corner of my street, well before this number one is happened that alone that each company uses an unemployed, the figure of the same ones it would go down to 1,5 millions what would mean that the unemployment would be established in 6%, perfect an index at German level. On the other hand the government needs to reduce the budgetary costs to all coast and so far it has attacked that is to say with unusual perversity to the public employee to the official but it is not neither enough neither fair, it is necessary to look for another form of reducing expenses. 

 

The expense of the unemployment excess is approximately 30 thousand million annual Eurus, it is clear that it is here where it is necessary to reduce and it is here where I say that we should make it among all, but so that the about effort it is good to reactivate the country and it doesn't stop to sink it more using money and I thoroughly sacrifice lost as raisin with the grants.  

 

They will see my idea it is that we pay among all the forced labor insert of 2,5 million unemployed, as making it, in the following way: the government should catch the managerial census of the country and to force to that these 2,5 million unemployed are distributed in the direct proportion of the active insoles, counting from directive until the lowest position, the salary cost of absorption of this manpower excess should be diluted that is to say among the current amount of the cost of the wages if a company of 100 workers plays him to use 5 and at the moment their costs for the chapter of personnel's retribution are of 2.100.000 annual Eurus that it represents a half retribution of 21 thousand Eurus for employee and year, this chapter he should stay what would bear equally that in the new proportion the cost for employee or rather its retribution would spend of 19.950 Eurus per year quantity that multiplied now by 105 employees he/she gives the same 2.100.000 Eurus. 

 

The other annexed costs as SS. And other deductions should go in charge of the serious company their social contribution for the resolution to the problem of reduction of the unemployment and of the reduction of national budget, they can tell me you that if there is not work that you/they would make 5 employees more in the company, don't worry at the moment if it is necessary to sweep, there is always work to make, it is done without of him because it represents an additional cost that the company reduces, but if there is not total increase of costs they don't worry that they already found them something to make.  

 

Man but then the cost of this operation relapses on the workers. Very a little yes, but that it is better than it continues relapsing in form of taxes and labor insecurity, because every time there is more recession because the unemployment increases and the low consumption, or to distribute a little bit of my salary so that they enter in the market of consumption 2,5 million consumers that they will make that it is reactivated the industry and the trade and they assured me that they improve my future opportunities. 

 

Think it there are already more than 1.2 million unemployed that don't charge anything and therefore that they live off the charity or of the subsidy that we already pay all, through our taxes or retentions etc. The change that I propose, is that instead of that these people are alone a social load, become active agents and spend and they help me to that my business and my company goes better and it is reactivated, and instead of descending the salary next year, go up it to me, it is that simple, the wheel of the economy works this way.  

 

Now then to absorb these new philosophies, they make lack governments, bosses and unions, with a very awake mind that they know how to plan it and to possibly explain to it better than me, since have data, means and organization to value the variables that the idea requires, but that that if they say the numbers it is that if we distribute alone five percent of the mount of the current wages of all the salary levels, we can possibly reinsert 10% of unemployed of the most complicated of reinserting, I repeat although it is to make of half nuisance in a first moment.