THE FUTURE SHOULD NOT BE EXCLUDING, FOR THAT IT IS FUTURE

Today I want to write ideas on how I see me the development of future life of our planet, I give for fact that of here a future not very distant he will have ended with the obsession of the sovereign debt, you limit them of indebtedness that has to the still world and without encouragement the future will have single revolutionary unemployed then otherwise. 

All joking aside I want to philosophize about the main necessity of the future world, in fact already of that of today. The world obsessed by the economy is leaving aside the ENERGY for me the energy, it is comparatively the egg, if there is not egg there is not hen and if there is not hen there is not egg. The future world needs eggs many eggs and one is not able to for very praiseworthy that seems to brake for fears and interests the search of the energy that they will provide from everything to the world and for end to the humanity. 

It is betting clearly for the electrification, for the movement, the impulse, the cold, the heat, the light, the conservation of foods, the communication, etc. is no longer possible a world without electricity, the bad thing is that the electricity is to produce it artificially the earth it doesn't produce it, alone it produces it the atmosphere and it is thoroughly lost one was not able to neither to pick up neither to dominate alone to drown and to disable to avoid collateral damages. 

We have been able to take advantage of the electricity very much more efficiently than never, we use it but and we consume less to produce it, somewhere around we go well, the problem thinks about in the forms and in the elements to produce it and to store it. As every time we need more, we consume more fossil matter, and hydraulics, the first one has their end and more advantageous applications economically speaking and it also contaminates, the second cannot give a lot more than yes, and the humanity needs more energy. 

Years ago the nuclear energy emerged as the panacea and one has seen that its risks and its residuals are unsociable relatively, I say nevertheless that one investigates little in this first sense he is not ahead with the nuclear "fusion " and I don't understand because, I know that at experimental level it has been achieved and it is clean, but face of producing this is to big features the main control, but this in my opinion is relative, because which is the alternative, the fission it seems that it is discarded, the society rejects it and in the face of the bad experience of three cases happened in 50 years it is already given for impossible, I mean that in the way that is taking place now I agree totally, you cannot continue having a surrounded atomic bomb of people.  

But the solution is not in filling with mills the sea and the earth, in covering the roofs and the fields of solar badges, neither from a distance these complements can fill neither the third part of the current necessities and less the future ones you imagine the intent of exploring the space with some rockets with a fan in the tip and another in the line for example, not I don't see it to him, and with enormous solar badges in relation to the transporter is impossible to think this way but if we pass the time in the economic problems we won't advance and who knows a discovery of new energies maybe, of the solution to the current problem.    

In the earth like we will move in the future one can think of the pneumatic, magnetic drive, even the molecular transportation, but at the moment all this needs energy and we return to the egg.