IT IS NOT THE CATALAN PROCESS THE STUPIDITY, WE ARE THE CATALAN

The British newspaper 'Financial Times' it publishes this Thursday an editorial five pesetas on the sovereignty process Catalan in which crosses out of "stupidity" the career toward the independence and it warns that, although Madrid should not react exaggeratedly, it is mainly Catalonia who should take a step first behind for not unchaining a deep crisis. He has the reason he/she coughs it is necessary to already take behind a step and begin again it is impossible with that happened to continue making walk to a cadaver. 

As the proverb he prays "among all they killed them and the alone one died" this it is the reality today the deceit of the CUP it cannot be admitted neither for those that I admit myself in favor of the independence of my small country but the things as me it is necessary to obtain them with decision and with cleaning you cannot continue planning to be Independent if it is you to stop to depend on a state to depend on a FORMATION IMPRESENTABLE OF LOOK ASAMBLEARIA AND ANARCHICAL, because this it is the current and serious situation the future one. 

I sincerely prefer begin celebrate general elections an and another time again until we get it or gorge of us and they toss us, but never to leave the fire of a democratic "tyranny" and structured as it is Spain to enter in the embers of an organization street ignoramus and unpresentable. If the "Financial Times" to this that has spent it considers a since stupidity if he is right we are stupid but you look stupid or we don't want to be Catalan and we will get it.  

The newspaper sustains that the Government's president, Mariano Rajoy, it has contributed to transform the Catalan political challenge into a “constitutional impasse” but he adds that the Catalan president, Artur Mas, it has "acted amateurishly" and another time. In short, he underlines that Mas it has "given the leadership of the movement independent", first to ERC and now to the party of extreme left CUP to the one that qualifies like a radical line that moves the dog of the Junts Pel Yes". It is more, it sustains that the approved resolution this week, to which "gave form these leftists", without giving to change to But their votes to be invested, it synthesizes to what extent he has gotten lost the control of the situation. 

The newspaper remembers that the whole block independent presented the elections like a plebiscite about the independence and it concludes that, looking at the “heterogeneous alliance” that embraces from CDC to the CUP, the result of 47,7 percent is even "very below what would be needed morally to justify a rupture with Spain, without legal disposition in the Constitution for the separation." 

With everything, the newspaper sustains that this crisis needs "a political" solution, because the Constitution has served the democratic Spain well but the country needs him to become an alive document that serves to a dynamic State and in evolution, reformed around clearer federal lines. The 'Financial Times' it opposed himself to the independence of Scotland and it considers that that of Catalonia would be "equally undesirable", with "devastating" economic consequences for Spain and it stops Catalonia and serious legal uncertainties and politicians about the viability of the public finances in both. 

I have not replied these comments of the Financial Times because it is guessed right them because one notices a lot that he/she doesn't have the whole real vision of the situation of Catalonia in front of Spain ` but he has looked like each other that he should make it because I consider that the independent Catalan should close this stage with a defeat more (he won't come us from a) and to reopen another process of independence again having in all that it is necessary to change many things and people and that as always I say the independence it is not won alone with votes but with the social fight, with knowing how to create inconveniences and problems and a calculated disobedience that it is not flagrantly illegal, to make palpable that maybe it is better that we leave that not to put under an obligation to stay.