Difficult zeal the one that I intend to develop in this article. In fact he
wanted to put in undoubtedly he possibly plays us to live a time change, and I
imagine that every so often to the human beings he plays them to live there
that clear and that disconcerting time change. Every century it has possibly
represented more than a change in way of life or as much as less than focusing
the life of people that we inhabit the earth, our great town the one that
welcomes us and where have to habituate ourselves according to the parameters
that surround us adjusting them with the best syntony of those that we come.
Parameters that transmit them to us our parents, our adults, our beliefs and
our own trial, and the hardest thing is that later he plays us to carry out
this transmission to those that we have put in this world.
We are at temporary level beginning a new alone century we take with him 15
years, this is not anything, I believe that we have to consider that we have
left a lot to still make so that this century he leaves their prints to those
that must come and to those that observed it and they studied in next coming
centuries. I believe that this century it began too well, this is normal not
because it is the principle of the century but because it is the end of the
past this fact it is important the centuries they work all same one it is
curious we can say that they are divided in three thirds the first third they
begin relatively bad they worsen and they recover in the second third and
finally they recover and they are stabilized in the third and then the
following one arrives and the cycle begins again.
Sociologically the humanity reacts this way since she is humanity, the
effect he is curious because is a paradox that repeats the century is finishes
well because she has been 100 years old to outline the technological changes,
to be redoes of the wars and the catastrophes and finally is in her best
moment, we are in the last tract and I believe that the humanity thinks - good
we have already made now everything we wait to next century to change the
things as if was an obligation and this is this way now we are in the first
third and we are trying to change everything and we are creating this way a
problem after another.
At the end of the century 20. West was floating well in the economic wealth
and the to be social, Asia with China to the head was in progress changing its
system of life toward an industrialization of success and the other ethnic
groups or continents or ethnos continued stable and without realizing all turn
very quickly, the crisis appeared there for June of the 2007. To explain to it
another time is not the reason of this I articulate all we know that what we
didn't know happen it is the change that will represent for many of us and here
the question begins.
The first thing is that the crisis attacks fundamentally to the western
society, logical era was who believe it and to who I effect of full and
stronger because we came from a situation of great economic peak and with a
limitless arrogance. Little less than we had created the change of the world
there was globalized the work and with it the possibility to change the poverty
of great part of the world for the possibility of a better life, according to
our parameters naturally that is to say consumption, wealth and freedom.
But we didn't want to realize that in fact we had not made it for altruism,
but for an ambition and a speculation limitless. The free and
democratic capitalist world of occident not thought of improving to other
societies but in taking out them profit to get rich more and with less work
that was the globalization and this was seen already come in the ends of the
century 20, but I eat he told them before the humanity he thought, we will
already fix it next century. In fact and to make it easier it is the same thing
that spends in a normal year in all we, make the same thing one year after
another we put an end it to parties and waste, even knowingly that the things
don't go us well or they don't go us like we wanted, but we think, good now it
is Christmas I will already fix it next year it is this way or not.
This century principle brought this way the crisis and occident lost the
creation of wealth passing over it to other much poorer societies and that for
some costs a hundred times inferior would make the same thing that until then
toward the rich world that is to say occident. But he didn't keep in mind two
things one that their selfishness made that even costing the things a hundred
times less, the western economies didn't reflect it in their consumption
markets, so the markets continued valuing the factories to the same sale price
as if they manufactured them in their industries with their workers and their
costs, it happened this way that at the little time instead of producing things
had to produce money to be able to maintain the western economies but this is
making it without base any industrial base because last century we pass over it
to us and you make the I unbalance of the economy.
Everything began this way increments of value they were created on
anything, without any real back, I remind Alan's sentence now Greenspan - the
irrational values - referring to the stock markets of USA, that happens we made
an irrationality. Which we are paying today in day this irrationality
unbalances that real and that hard world mainly for those that we made the
error. The problem that he has suggested me this article is consequence of this
long exhibition in fact all this step in a scarce 45 year-old margin 30 of last
XX century and the 15 that we begin of this XXI one.
It is more, the real disaster that is to say when we gave ourselves of
downwards with the consequence of our irrationality he makes so alone seven.
And with the result that he can say that without a doubt we are still in
"State of Shock", and this it is the state that we should overcome
quickly because otherwise the changes that are approached can be disastrous.
Economically the world has given a turn of 180 grades the wealth this today
advancing from south to north.
Demographically the migratory disaster still goes to des composer more the
economies, the phenomenon is interesting of studying they will see because:
Apart from the geopolitical question, in the one that the poor, basically Arab
and African world, is a lot of religious confusion and of government, this
world he understands that the wealth is in the north, it is what has seen and
they have counted him during centuries its ancestors, evidently this has been
this way for many centuries, he also has very unpleasant memories of the towns
of the north that I colonize them, I enslave them, the abuse, of this doesn't
make a lot more than two centuries.
Very now he has stayed amid the two evolutions the rich North and the South
that it is also already rich but that he doesn't know neither he fears him
neither he has him any bill to get paid, so a current migratory double as has
been created in good faith because the without control of its own
world forces them to escape from him and other, because there are a very
studied subversive politics and very extremist conqueror that he has as clear
objective to unbalance the north, in this case Europe, so like he says the
proverb to thin "dog everything they are fleas", conclusion, we meet
with a hard economic crisis, without industrial resources to overcome it, with
millions of unemployed and with already millions of immigrants, among those
that there are also soldiers terrorists and suicides.
This is the scenario in that we are and I eat consequence we are defeated,
we drop economies we drop the democracy, they appear us political of populist
character - communist, we are to a step of breaking the unit of the euro, and
we don't know that we have to make this it is field paid for other political or
economic cultures, the clearest case is Russia that has decided to begin a Cool
War (at the moment) to see that it takes out of profit and it can take out a
lot, Greece is very close. Spain goes on the way to a change of politics of
extremist character of left, in short I believe that it is necessary to change
attitude as soon as possible it is necessary to leave the defeat attitude and
to take that of fighters, or it doesn't fit them doubt, we won't leave our
successors a free and rich world, but just the opposite.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario