LOOKING BACK WITH PAIN AND FORWARD WITH TERROR

With the current situation full with controversies and disagreements one is not able to for less than to stop and to toss the view behind. How have we arrived until here? It is the first thing that assaults you to the thought and yes you think a little of it, he gives you a lot of pain because until here we have arrived to loins of a great idea, of a great political illusion, to which we have failed him boisterously. 

How great idea the European Union that great political-social project the one that began there in Paris in 1951, from then on with more pain than glory, the illusion and the effort of creating an European Union was overcoming treaty to treaty, on those beginnings fearful of the big instigators of the project France and Germany; you passes of simple market of the coal and the steel, to the common market, to the disappearance of opposite, to the free circulation of people and capitals among countries, many irreconcilable times, until creating an only currency for all, and here it breaks the European dream. 

The currency uncovers the substantial differences of the European countries and they leave to it floats the enormous differences among them, this accuses very clearly that the dream of an united Europe is not possible, because it is not homogeneous in anything, neither in the spoken language, neither in the economy, neither in the thought europeísta. Europe continues being a containing one and don't unite union of countries, and one aim back and it feels pain because we have not been able to arrive to the final objective. 

Then you think, maybe in the future, and you look forward and worse then you feel terror, because you realize that the future is behind the turn.  The economic crisis demands changes in the European Union; radical transformations that they would have been gestating in Germany whose chancellor believes for months that it cannot have an authentic fiscal, economic union, without a real political union. But at the same time this idea, another wonderful and certain time, he runs the risk that against what happened in 1951, be not of the pleasure of the other theoretical components of the same one. He already told it on Saturday the German minister of Finances and candidate to preside over the Euro group, Wolfgang Schaüble: the European Union should experience a quick and radical integration that goes by a strong surrender of national sovereignty. 

Today, The Vanguard baptizes in an article the position of Schaüble like a "great political" explosion, a "big bang" to the front of which places Angela Merkel. According to this newspaper, the German chancellor has a plan whose materialization goes by an understanding with the French president, François Hollande, in eves of the encounter of the euro group. But, and an always appears but, France is shown reticent to give sovereignty to the UE. And in the antipodes of what Germany thinks, he believes that first it is necessary to arrive to a fiscal union, and then, to advance in the political union. 

Berlin, on the other hand, defends that it is not possible that some they become responsible for other if before sovereignty is not given the UE and he makes sure that there is a control common of the national decisions in economic" matter, Germany would be willing to continue ahead with its plan in spite of who weighs him, although to give sovereignty to Brussels herself it should reform its constitution, company that you points it could attack after the elections of autumn of 2013.es to say apart from the non certainty characteristic of a political change in the elections we are speaking of 2 years seen. 

This is what is presented as future, the same thing that has failed as past, and it is not necessary to say that if it is the same thing it passed the same thing it will fail. It is not also possible this solution for the time to use in summing up it, the euro group cannot wait other 2 years under the current conditions of political and economic no governability, it is of logic, there are countries without possibility of self-financing, without possibility of surviving economically low the umbrella tyrant of the euro, these countries in one year more they are unrecoverable, then arrived at the end of this period of time the alone outlined solution it would be possible in a still more reduced European Union, possibly to those first 6 founders and initiators of the adventure. 

Don't fit them doubt this he is the logical vision and realist of the future of the euro group, and frankly to my he gives me terror, because if something is safe it is that Spain won't be in the final group of here to 1 or 2 years seen, our road as that of other more ones is in the turn to the autochthonous economy and to survive in a world totally far from the central europa, this is evident, and I find that the most sensible thing would be to already begin to outline it, because to maintain the hope that it really ends up existing a political and economic union of the UE, it is or to my he/she looks like each other this way it, a complete utopia.