THE AREA EURO BEGINS TO SEE THE PROBLEM BUT NOT THE SOLUTION

It seems that finally the axis Paris Berlin is seeing the problem in all its width, that is to say he knows the financial economic part and he leaves giving bill that with clipping the expense he won't be able to solve it, it lacks another part that it is the obtaining of wealth, for it seeks to introduce it a new bound tax to the financial world with the idea of using it like help to the development of the productivity in the area euro. 

The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, they have elaborated a plan of six points to make in front of the crisis of the area of the euro that will present to the president of the Council of the European Union, with a view to the summit of the day January 30 in Brussels. The document offers the support of the Governments from Berlin and Paris to the proposal of the Commission of the UE of introducing a rate to the transactions financial, as well as wide measures to reinforce the growth, the employment creation and the competitiveness of all Europe. 

The plan prevue that to combat the high unemployment in many European countries, the employment offices commit to offer in a certain term a work or a formation position to those who look for work. Also, it proposes that in border regions they are believed combined employment agencies experimentally to process offers beyond the national limits. 

The initiative of Merkel and Sarkozy establish that the salary costs should decrease that the concession of simple credits is facilitated to the small and medium companies, and that these they simplify its accounting. Equally, it contemplates the simplification of some bank norms to assure the financial business so that the concessions of credits increase to the companies. The Governments from Berlin and Paris also press so that they are carried out reformations in the public administrations, with the purpose of reducing the bureaucratic steps and they bet to support especially to those countries that have already presented strict saving programs and reformations. 

It is not bad but it lacks the essential thing, these measures sound me to grants to the unemployment, or to the deficit companies or with problems of productivity and competition, and that is not what created wealth to the euro area, the essential point I lack the one that should solve the budgetary deficit and to reduce the sovereign debts, and this chapter is not another that the repatriation of the productions is located outside of the euro area and the creation of new companies for the production of new competitive products that they allow the interior commercialization and the export of the same ones. 

It cannot fall in the easy thing that is it that I look among lines in the position of this document, the grant. It can be that I throw when not being this document of public domain and therefore I base myself on press articles published today, but I have liked to read: Helps for investments for the creation of new production plants, helps to the recruiting for their new work positions, creation of tax-free industrial areas temporarily for some periods of beginning, helps for the investigation and industrial, scientific development and of new technologies and materials, development of big infrastructures and projects taken to term in régime of given public administration their span and their stadium of general use for (example a station European of satellites) it would be also interesting a plan of study of re implantation of practically abandoned industrial processes, and relocated in other continents. 

We cannot subsidize to the alone current industry so that it absorbs some thousands of workers so that these they increase the internal consumption with the help of buying import products, because what we will be making is this way indirectly to not activate our economy, but the same one that drowns us in these moments feeding her and making it stronger another time with our own Eurus.  

As I say in several of my previous articles, our first enemy is the globalization, mainly in his production part, and like I said eta situation some days ago it has already been seen also by the USA whose president Obama pronounced in a meeting of high executives of American companies, a speech in that it proposed the repatriation of the productions is located outside of the USA promising helps in form of discounts of taxes and exclaiming that he wanted to see the Americans consuming designed thought products and manufactured "Made in  USA."