DE EUROPEAN DISUNION TO EUROPEAN FEDERAL UNION

It seems already unquestionable the European Union should converge in a European Federal Union of States, it is necessary to take this solution to solve the problem of Europe. They are only two options: to go forward toward a more narrow union or back to as not well smaller a partial breakup. This is what is in game. 

 

The area euro, just as this it has failed. It was based on a group of principles that they have demonstrated to be unviable to the first collision with a financial and fiscal crisis, the reason of this it is very simple, the European union derives of the incipient unions of markets and trade, later to the second world war, these unions were made by the interest on the part of Germany that like a locomotive dragged the economy post warlike with great force, and he/she needed coal, steel, and manpower that non have, got it, the German miracle arose strongly, I crawl to the rest of their neighbors and with it did a rich Europe and it prospers. 

 

Germany believed and with reason that Europe was them, and he/she began to work so that the European nations felt it same and it got it, the first founders of the euro zone (France, Luxemburg, Italy, Belgium, Low Countries and the own Germany) they belonged to oneself derived culture of the second world war that although one lived in these countries in an unequal way, all were in some moment it leaves of the Germany Nazi, it stops later on to become winners from the own Germany. 

 

The biggest impulse arrives in 1957 with the signature of the Treaties of Rome. The six decide to advance in the cooperation in the economic, political and social domains. The outlined goal was to achieve a common market that allows the free circulation of people, goods, and of capitals. The European Community was in progress. But this union had forged it Germany without place to doubts, without its economic interests, and the desires of leaving the defeat, stronger of that than it was when entering in war, nobody no other country has gotten it. 

 

I also believe that this incipient European union, also took place to be able to come off of the apparent dependence of the USA and of its "European" all the Great Britain, and of the fear to the expansion of the then USSR, so I have the first idea of the UE very undoubtedly, neither it was altruistic, neither it was shared, it was a so much imposed by Germany that needed it urgently, and accepted by its allies for that these they saw that for separate, they didn't count for anything in the European concert as such an Europe it was in hands of the USA and the USSR. 

 

In 1965 a treaty is signed that gives step to the creation of the European Commission (CE) and the Council of the European Commission, organ that should not made a mistake with the European Council that is the institutionalization of the summits of Bosses of State and of Government of countries members that began to be developed at the end of the decade of the 60. I don't want to continue with a supplementary, alone history lesson he/she wanted to make stress in the sense of the creation of the current UNITED STATES. 

 

The later events, amplifications, new treaties, etc. has given the creation of an unique currency as a result, but don't unite unique and balanced economy and this has not been this way, because from the beginning this, Germany was not looked for he simply wanted to grow and to become independent of the oppression of the winners, and fundamentally of the USSR. He was so afraid to a communist reprisal that was even about to bleed economically, when I annex their Democratic Germany, 1989 and in that moment the effective thing was seen that it was again for their reconstruction, the European Union. 

 

But Germany has not assumed never this, Germany it continues thinking that Europe is his and he doesn't give its arm to twist, the bad thing or the good thing you not to define it, it is that or lively or pushed by the successes of the first union, or for pressures of the other partners to those that it is necessary also to allow them to decide something, has left enlarging the union, and at the same time he has left dividing, curious paradox, but this it is the reality, a reality that Germany doesn't want to assume, and he doesn't realize that it leaves of the blame of what happens now in Europe it is for its blame, because it was her the one that form this way it, and when it was him well he applauded it, you pleasure to itself, and he expanded it selfishly and without control, and this it is the current situation. 

  

Now it is necessary to take conscience of it and to decide openly that it is Europe, and if the answer is "An ASSOCIATION OF COMMERCIAL INTERESTS” it is necessary to disassemble it and go to look for more small, homogeneous and balanced unions. And if the answer is then "An UNION OF EUROPEAN NATIONS” it is necessary to reinforce it with an only constitution, and at the same time, the renouncement of all, to our identity national singular, to become EUROPEAN, that hard, and the one that doesn't want to lose its identity, has to stay it was, and if they are many those that think this way, because good-bye to the European union. 

 

Let us don't cover but the truth is not the debt of the PIGS or the pressure of the markets on the Euro, we are us because we don't behave evenly as they make it the USA, China, Brazil etc.… for that reason they attack us the markets, and not because some should more than other, the markets are not silly and I make you this What a question it wins the market if the European debt collapses, it doesn't win he swims on the contrary it loses the debt, because nobody won't return it.