THERE ARE ROADS TO MAKE A MORE SOCIAL EUROPEAN UNION

Bad day to write another time on that that so many other times I have written, but it is that today they are not alone my words, today finally late and bad, anything takes communion with them less than Mario Draghi the truth it is that I full with pride, seem a rooster right now going for a walk spiritually for among the jigs of my computer, my god that immodesty has the mankind, but it is that this time I believe myself in the right of to be and to feel this way and on the other hand, I am very disappointed because what agrees with me today, at the same time indicates me that we are low the domain of hidden interests and completely false of social approaches. 

The president of the European Central Bank (BCE), Mario Draghi, warned today of the danger that there are big structural divergences among the countries of a monetary union and it qualified them of potentially threatening and explosive. He said it during their intervention in a forum of the BCE taken place in the Portuguese municipality of Sintra, to some 30 kilometers of Lisbon. - In a monetary union you cannot allow yourself to have big and growing structural divergences among countries, if these they exist they spread to be explosive -,  

The maximum responsible for the supervisor bank European considered openly that these structural divergences among countries will threaten the existence of the monetary union. How many times I have written it likewise. Because what is a clear evidence, is not recognized until today after leaving that it happens and they are deepened during five years. It has been necessary that they are seen front now a Eurozone that will explode in three or four pieces and that it will break the total construction of a true European Union of which can forget already, if there is not a turn of 180 grades among the European politicians.  

Draghi remembered that the BCE is the "guardian" of the European unique currency and it defended that in a monetary union the central bank should comment and to alert of matters that can harm the execution of its command of stability of prices or to mine the existence of that union. I don't understand this philosophy but it is the one that unfortunately reigns in the UE, in her each country makes like he is making and defending the BCE now, each country is granted the position of guardian of its country, of defending the interests of its country and of commenting the bad thing that they make it the other countries except his. 

After that said previously in their speech, he insisted in the message that left the previous day in the forum, again when it encouraged the European governments to take advantage of the economic recovery to make the reformations that they need their countries. It won't have better moment to make reformations that now", Italian emphasized who he added that at the present time there is certain lack of "political structural" that include, for example, the flexibility of the work market or the reformations of the systems of pensions publics.  

In their allusion to this last point, he requested to the governments of the area euro continuity. "A country that reforms the system of pensions and later it changes ideas every year, he doesn't obtain any short term", such type of benefits it seems that refers to Spain, although you look at friend Draghi, you continue mistaken as much in the outline as in the form of making what you request, if you have seen that there is a great divergence in the structures of the countries, it is evident that the pensions are also divergent among them and it is evident also that some divergent governments will never be able to make laws and convergent structures. 

Because such an important position as the pensions that it is in the bottom the sustenance of base of the European societies, (you imagine all the pensioners without pensions the one that they would arm in the whole UU) it would surely sink all the European governments and they would create an authentic revolution that would finish he doesn't doubt it in an III European war. 

Then if this is this way, because we don't begin to create general structures, because he doesn't surrender the making and the administration from some European pensions to the BCE and they could become this way finally convergent and not divergent, it would be a second step (after the euro) that would unite much more the UE and he would begin to make it more human and more social, because now the UE and the BCE are simply a bank and an economy that nobody makes it to him his because you don't go that it is a structure made for the society but for the capital and the politics.