YOU CANNOT BE REDISTRIBUTED HE HAS TO BEGIN OF NEW

To "work, to grow, to make". It can be an electoral slogan with which few voters would differ. But a new report of the OECD leaves lack very undoubtedly a key word in the recipes applied in the European countries in the last years: to redistribute. According to the report "In it together", presented today in Paris, the politicians carried out supposedly from the beginning of the crisis to impel the economic growth have exacerbated the problem of inequality of rents in many countries of the OECD among them Spain, the third unequaled country of the area euro after Greece and Portugal. This is not alone a problem of social justness since - against the arguments of conservative economists in vogue from the years eighty - "when it goes up the inequality of the rent, the growth he decreases." 

The authors of this conclusion are in the certain thing as final of their study but they are not very guided rather just the opposite as for the theory of the solution Spain it is in fact here the example the great problem of the economic in operative of the country a country of 47 million inhabitants it is in fact the REDISTRIBUTION the Spanish governments for centuries they are based on maintaining Spain with the help of redistributing and not of competing it is this way like the tremendous social and economic inequalities that make us locate in the third place of the unequal’s nations in Europe takes place. 

It is an important warning for those who celebrate the Spanish economic turnaround. Because - contrary to Portugal - the Spanish inequality is ascending. France, Germany and Italy have also registered ascents of the inequality from the beginning of the crisis but from lower levels that Spain. Single Greece shares with Spain the fact of being one of the unequal’s countries where the polarization of the rent grows. It is preoccupant because Spain stood out to have reduced the inequality in the previous years to the crisis and the politicians of austerity. 

Alone Spain has two points of creation of wealth one it is Madrid and another Catalonia but the rest of Spain they are subsidized by the state so that they are able to end up having an economy that simply maintains evidently them inside the rest of Spain there are communities that have an acceptable but insufficient own economy, but others don't not even have economy to subsist, then that it happens that it is impossible that the government balances anything, but the most serious problem is that the redistribution collapses the possibility that the Catalan community for example, it can develop bigger wealth with what indirectly also brakes to the rest of Spain. 

This the governments from Spain one after other knows it and they are limited from immemorial times to centralize everything in the capital, that is to say in Madrid, so the reality is that the redistributed community is in fact Madrid, there the governments from Spain have located everything, from there everything begins, in Madrid they are from necessity of effectiveness the central headquarters of the banking, because the operative one financial daily he goes from Madrid, there the delegations are and central of the big companies of Catalonia and other places, because there they are: the banking, the bag, the industry ministries, of trade, of sanity, of education, in short of everything, to make something in Spain it is necessary to go by Madrid.   

This surprisingly produces a movement of very important GDP but it doesn't produce wealth neither added value some, because Madrid their production source is the bureaucracy and this doesn't take place more than costs, but for the other communities. So this situation makes impossible that Spain can redistribute, because this means just the opposite of what the authors of the study think with which we begin this article, the redistribution in Spain causes the recession of Catalonia and the stagflation of the rest of included Spain Madrid. 

On the other hand, European countries as Belgium Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, Ireland or Poland have lowered their levels of inequality during the crisis, for that reason Catalonia wants the independence notices that are referring of small countries (except Poland). there are other things that they cause the inequalities for example the economy of type Anglo Saxon like it demonstrates the United Kingdom the pattern of deregulation of this economy it maintains it as the unequal’s European country. USA continues being the unequal in the advanced countries and, it is more, the breach of rents between the rich ones and the rest goes getting wider more and more after a recovery that, so far, alone he has benefitted to the richest. 

As he said it is not necessary to redistribute it is necessary to look for the economy of the competitiveness, it is necessary to plan but not to redistribute, if the UE has realized this it could have planned lines of products or production or services distributing them for the wide of the territory of the UE, not leaving that like raisin in Spain with Madrid, all east in Germany but now it is impossible to redistribute anything or it is that they believe the authors of this atrocity that now one can deindustrialized part of Germany to industrialize Spain or France. 

What you should look for is the possibility to liberalize the competitiveness of the different economies of the UE and for it alone there is a solution, the turn to after the euro, or he returns to the old disparity of foreign currencies for countries that each one can guide their value according to their possibility of productivity and competitiveness or to attempt the impossible thing that we all are as rich as Germany that the Euro means in its moment a value parity 1 a1 with the German Marco. 

It is impossible, for Spain for example, where suddenly an euro represents 163 pesetas to assume it, have you in bill that for example a coffee that cost 100 pesetas step to cost 1 euro, the same thing that cost in Germany but with the added difficulty that Germany stops this it didn't mean any change, while in Spain he represented to pay 60% more for the same thing and however the salaries were limited to transform them according to the real change, without keeping in mind the German salaries, and it happened this way that the prices were equaled in the UE but the costs were not the same ones for all. This is the reality that the UE cannot save and this fact that has not been known how to correct is the one that took us to that the idea of a European union with a unique currency failed, one day or another.