IT'S NECESSARY TO GET READY TO BE ABLE TO WIN TWO RESULTS DEPUTIES AND VOTES

The elections of September 27, summoned last Monday for the president of the Generalitat, Artur Mas, they are not objectively a plebiscite about the independence, another thing is that the result of the same ones can take like an approach to such a political-artificial figure. A plebiscite is that is to say a voting of dual character alone it admits two answers YES or NOT reason why he understands each other that the question proposed to plebiscite is only and these characteristics are not given in this convocation that one votes to clever and political parties.

The question is that, as they pass the days and the debate on this question he goes winning relevance in the pre campaign, the use of the word "plebiscite" goes being substituted among its partisans by a subtler version to define the sense of the elections. They will have, they affirm, "character plebiscitary" and this if it is possible because the results of the voting’s can give a relevance to oneself project inscribed in several lists to vote taking it out of the group of general proposals this common project then it adds the entirety of the votes that has had from the different voted lists in fact.

The reading plebiscitary of the 27S will depend mainly, of what happens the day 28, the following day. And of the political decisions that take then. In definitive, the result of the elections maybe is not as outstanding as it can be the reading of the verdict of the urns in the later days. The problem then will be planted, in how these results will be read by the politicians this it is the incognito one, the politicians will know how to take out of their proposals the topic proposed in common or they stayed in the results of the political scrutiny and if I win I is already well and I won't sacrifice for others.

This is the risk to that we expose ourselves when not being able to outline the true question in a direct way, but it is also true that this same risk the parties and the Spanish unionists run him when not having wanted to facilitate the possibility of the plebiscite or of the referendum that he came to be the same thing in this case. At the end the option taken by Artur Mas he has a certain advantage on what the government from Spain denied us and it is that he has many more reading forms like for example with what measure units, where the limit is between the success or the failure of the yes or the no.

How and they legitimate the urns the political process announced after an eventual victory of the lists of the where yes. In this point, to tell the truth, everything is quite confused. It will be very difficult that the two tendencies accept the results if this he gives the victory on the contrary if they win the inclined lists to the YES, the lists of the they didn't look for all kinds of arguments to disqualify the arguments that the winners will propose that if the number that if the percentage that if they are votes or if they are deputies’, and this will happen equally in the case that was the lists of the NO or rather of the "no yes"

The character plebiscitary that is wanted to print to the elections is the result of the political unviability of the use of other options to exercise the right to decide in the one that agrees 80% of the Catalan citizenship according to the surveys. Now then, the way in that he seeks to survive that obstacle presents, many uncertainties.

Now then, with the on view in Europe, at the end, the figures yes they will be important. All the specialists consider that most absolute in benches it is indispensable to verify the proposed result, but on the other hand there is not agreement in if most should also be given in votes, a requirement that would be inexcusable in a plebiscite so those that we want an IF firm we don't have left more remedy than besides winning the elections for absolute majority they are the lists of the IF those that obtain the biggest number of votes.