THE EFFRONTERY OF THE POLITICIANS AND THE HONESTY OF THE BANKS

I sit down it a lot but I cannot admit that the maneuvers orchestrated by the European politicians are liquidated with success, it is des alienator to see as these terrible ones political alone they think of the form of getting rid of their responsibility, the European economic crisis, is not blame of anybody more than of them and its inability to negotiate and to govern the to go and to come from the events, in this economic case of those that are absolutely responsible. Now the last one that you/they are preparing is to load the blames to the European banking and that doesn't have neither feet neither head, it is necessary to distinguish very well between the selfish abuses of some bankers and the honesty of the banks. 

To try to make relapse on the banking the problems of the sovereign debt of the European countries, it is a solemn swindle on the part of the responsible politicians of governing us, with this plan, they attempt treacherously, and treachery, to deviate their outrages toward some entities that are so you kill of them, as it is it the society that he suffers hardships and cuttings without palliatives. It is certain that for blame of some characters' characteristic of the banking performances, they have put in tray to the politicians to create the plot to accuse to the banking of creating the problem that has not created, if not just the opposite, the banking is victim of the problem. 

I will explain to it more simply that it is capable: This undoubtedly the problem is either the Sovereign Debt the Greek, the Spaniard or the Italian gives same, the question is that the governments of the countries in the moment that they stopped to obtain net revenues by means of transactional resources of internal and external trade, began to emit public debt, (of course endorsed by the states) without any control neither political neither of any economic-fiscal organization, this public debt put on for sale in the national and international financial markets as logical era, and as well as it was logical who could buy that product they were the Banks, Fund of pensions and investment and Companies Insurance, companies that surprisingly made these purchases because in theory, there is not nothing else for sure the paper with the guarantee of a state, they know you that even the plans of pensions and the insurance, they are forced to have a wide percentage of these products to assure their funds and yields. 

So the logical thing is that the banks bought those funds, letters, and other , of the states, the operation was clear they put their resources to good I collect and they also received some you interest, for but guarantee the sovereign debt is even considered as an asset for the balance of the bank entities, so in the practice it was as having the money cash and with interests. What has it happened because now a problem is? Because very simple the governments of some countries have spent of debt, and have they fallen in the crime of well-known fraud as the pyramidal swindle. I believe that all will know to that I refer, but just in case in few words it is that financial maneuver that consists on already covering a debt and their interests worn-out, with another bigger debt without redeeming the passing, and so forth. 

Also for but gibe, we all know that in the last months the banks have been forced to buy sovereign debt even when they had already seen the disaster that one came above, and it doesn't finish the betrayal of the governments here and political, if not that now they arrive to ends of in qualifiable attitude, when going this way by the good ones to consider the Sovereign Debt of Active to Passive, and now they adduce that there is that recapitalize to the banks because they are the culprits of the first floor level of quality of their capital, but up to where they seek to arrive these in presentable governments and European politicians, it is that they have left a movie of Chicago gangsters or what demons it happens. 

Recapitalize the banks are a solemn foolishness, it is that if, a great lid of the garbage that the politics has spread everywhere, this solution should not admit it in no way the banks, because not alone it won't serve as anything, but rather it created but falsehood and distrust in the financial system, to the one that sooner or later will appeal to reactivate the economy productive only solution to leave the crisis. Do they want recapitalize the banking that it flows the credit again? Because they have it very easy it is not necessary that they give money to the banks, simply rescue them the debt that they are receivers deposits it in the BCE and automatically the balances of the banks will have located their "core capital" in the percentage that you want, because with this simple operation when not counting the debt like passive the "capital good" less Passive Asset will ascend.  

And with the debt that we make Because what he was necessary to make from the beginning, the sovereign debt is a swindle of the governments, if they hurry me the I will try of very deliberate, that is to say I won't give him treatment of fiscal crime but in fact unfortunate, but this is blame of the political one and therefore it is the politics who has to take with it, pick up the spread debt buying it to the banks through the BCE, although him in spite of Germany, and by means of fiscal taxes to the most indebted European countries, to the cuttings in the budgetary expenses, and to the reactivation that would suppose the relief from the capitals to disposition of the civil society on the part of the banking that the BCE studies as redeeming the rescued debt, but don't rescue to the banks they are not the problem.