IT SEEMS THAT THE NECESSITY IS STRONG MA THAT THE OBLIGATION

The financial crises, later economic and now of debt, they have been imposed on indecision and the Manichaeism of the European politicians and their responsible ones economic, the stubborn and tenacious reality as it is always, it takes them to the last and definitive step, the necessity to confront removes in Europe. In other words, forgive part of the debts. However, the European politicians continue outlining in spite of the irreversible of the fact, an enormous macroeconomic and financial damage that is hindering the consent of the European leaders, because these opinions are directed by those countries and political that is not so affected by the problem, because they continue without seeing to Europa like the European Union.  

But this is not this way, there are not disastrous consequences neither anything resemblance, rather on the contrary if once and for all they are summed up and re conducing the parameters of alive debt that the economy of the different indebted countries can confront with guarantees, and the rest is condoned, the lost ones will be these and not more. The main thing is to arrive to this convincing and this decision and to approve it unanimously and at once don't begin another time to that the parliaments of each one of the 17 countries of the euro have that to approve it because of being this way three months more europa it doesn't tolerate. 

We are I relent of a very common financial operation, anything is not invented it is simply to apply a perfectly drawn financial measure and of normal use, in all the bids of crashes and suspensions of payments, it is an agreement between the creditor and their debtor for which is condoned in a partial way a debt, if the creditor goes that they owe him 100 and that if he persists in wanting to charge 100, the debtor broke and the he stayed at 0, so it calculates and it negotiates with the debtor and if the collection possibility this in 60, the creditor prefers to charge those 60 and to condone 40 that not to charge anything, simple and simple. Clear here one can interpret that the lost of this operation has been of 40 or one can also say that the benefit of the operation has been of 60, it is question of interest and desires of solving the things. In this sense, the debtor (for example, Greece), it would negotiate with the creditor (banks forks of Greek debt) to only pay them part of what owes them. The creditors give up the right of recovering it, and I lower my approach they win the whole amount that if they got paid. 

As everything in the life and in economy but, the things is not free and one removes it confronts some duties on the part of the debtor. In the case of Greece, we already see which are at the moment. You savages, he escapes of capitals, general desperation, lost of solvency, etc. but I also want to take advantage of the occasion to stress that the blame of its situation is his, so its moral and economic cost that bears this situation, should assume it. And regarding the creditors that want that he tells them they won't have the blame so directly as the debtor, but in this case many have wanted to close the eyes knowing the reality of the situation, for the big benefits that the debt of Greece bore in its interests, so I would like to be able to make a calculation, thing that I am not able to because these data are not within my reach, in the sense that the debt part that you/they will condone, this compensated by the charged interests. 

They will see if I take 100 Eurus of German debt they will produce me 2 Eurus a year, however if I take 100 Eurus of Greek debt they produce me at least 6, that is to say 4 more Eurus, to the five years of this situation with the German debt I have a capital of 110 Eurus, however with the Greek debt I have 130 Eurus, so if now I condone 20 of the a hundred, I will keep 80 but the 30 that I have of interests add 110 Eurus, Surprise is the same thing that if has invested in German debt, I repeat that this is an example, but the things go for this road, it is evident that when you already see that you cannot stretch but the risk of continuing financing a debt that will break, is to stop and to see that one makes, very since this it is the moment and the inextensible situation of to value all this and to take the definitive measures. 

And they don't doubt it if this has lasted so much time it is because while I last, the creditors have won very much now that the unfortunate and swindled are not made innocent it doesn't strain in this situation there has been and there are still three culprits first Greece, second the entities owners of their debt that have been covered, and third the political and economic stamens of the Euro area that seeing all this doesn't take active part in it, until maybe this weekend when the situation is already truly inextensible.