It seems lie, my irritation
today it is maximum, I cannot understand like it has been allowed to arrive to
the disastrous situation in that we are put the Europeans and when practically
the war is lost they leave to it floats the European president's declarations
(one of so many) and it is that he has it doesn't unite but ten solutions to
the fantastic, devastating, ridiculous, intolerable crisis, it proves palpable
that although it seems the opposite the European Union it doesn't exist it is a
fantasy created in the mind of the politicians of the 1950.
We will see the truths of
"Pero Grullo" that it is able to think Mr. Juncker Of an interview
with the German newspaper 'Handelsblatt' published today, Juncker also
insinuated that it could be necessary a bigger reduction of the debt of Greece.
"If in the report of the 'troika' elements that question the sustainable
of the load of Greek debt, appear then we should discuss how we can guarantee
the debt of Greece (with measures) beyond a participation of the private
sector", Juncker said. I don't understand anything the same thing that
apparently happened to the interviewer which I ask if he had a plan to finish
with the crisis, Juncker made ten suggestions:
1) "(to liberate) the
next tract (of help for Greece), if it is possible". (You should already
know if it will be or not possible it is absurd that the president of the Union
has doubts on this fact that is on the one that rotates the whole strategy of
pursuit and I demolish of the economy euro)
2) to "determine the sustainable
of the debt of Greece, if we don't have to think of other measures that we can
only take if we have thought of all the consequences of those steps--also those
beyond Europe--". (Another incongruity is the same question of the point
one outlined in another way but it is the same thing, and also the same
insecurity to these heights is no longer time of thinking of other
measures).
3) "Strict
continuation, of course, of the budgetary consolidation, with automatic
sanctions for the countries that don't reach the budgetary" goals.
(Eternal question that if has been taken to term when France and Germany were
jumped the norm of national budgetary deficit because they needed has not
arrived until the current disaster of sovereign debts).
4) Route "leaf for the
bank recapitalization. The banks little capitalized have first to try to be
refinanced in the markets. If this doesn't happen, the countries have to
consider if they can intervene to make them available the capital that they
need". The taxpayers should obtain dividends for the rescue of the banks.
We cannot simply give them the money. We have to assure that those that provide
capital, in any form, they are also represented in the organs of decision--in
the supervision advice, the address advice, in the administration--and that
they participate of the benefits". (Mr. Juncker is conscious that every
time that the states help to its banking the sovereign debt it ascends, for
that that what gets ready on one hand, it is ruined by the other one. It would
not be better than was the BCE that recapitalizes the national bank’s lending
them money that then these they should return, and to leave alone the debts of
the countries that once.
5) To introduce a tax to the
financial transactions. (To have if they get it because the truth is that it is
already an old idea that doesn't finish putting into operation because among other,
the Great Britain, main enemy of the economy of the euro doesn't interest
him).
6) "A program of growth
for the calls countries with problems". (finally something important and
of peremptory necessity, alone a couple of observations, the program in
question should not be bounded alone to the countries with problems, but to all
the countries of the area euro, if Germany can take place more and to consume
but it is not necessary that he waits to that we fix for example Spain. This is
the only valid exit so that the countries can reduce their budgetary deficits
and their sovereign debts. Producing wealth by means of the industrial
production and of services, and dedicating the obtained resources, to balance
their budgets, alone we act as up to now on the expenses, we won't get more
than to lengthen the agony of the situation.
7) "A different
budgetary tone in Europe. It is not acceptable that the countries of the
European Union are divided among those that give and those that take". (I
don't agree on Europe there will always be who has to give, more than to take
and vice versa, this it is the game of the realities you specify of an area of
more than 300 million inhabitants, neither all are same neither all leave of
the same conditions, Mr. Juncker this also passes in Spain, there is who has to
give more than other, and alone we are a part of the union. So I declare myself
unable to understand that he has meant with this point, if I agree on the
European centralized intervention in the budgets of the different states, but
not for the cause that you adduce).
8) "A bigger regulation
of the financial" markets. (Bigger regulation non TOTAL regulation yes, it
is necessary to change the rules of the speculative game and to pursue the
fraud and the wild speculation to all coast)
9) "A new strategy to
negotiate with the rating" agencies. (He will never be able to negotiate
with the Anglo-Saxon Corsairs, what it is necessary to make, is to create the
European Agencies of Qualification for those that the European economy you will
govern when valuing investments and we lend, these agencies will also qualify
of course, to the economies, credit entities, banks, and companies of the
world, and alone context their qualifications will be the official ones in the
environment of the European market)
10) We "need an
economic government. I am charmed with the fact that the quantity of people
that you/they support this idea has grown quickly". (I still request more,
not alone it is urgent the European government economic power station but
rather Europe should spread to be configured in a Federal Unique State and the
current countries to become federations subject to a central federal
government.
(*) Pero Grullo. - Character of fable that referred as new the known
things in the common society. When somebody says such an evident or so known
thing that it is a trivial statement.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario