It was "an error to allow to enter to Greece in
the area euro. In the 2001 their economy was not prepared. We have paid the
consequences now", Nicolas Sarkozy has declared. Yes Mister it is it
was this way an error, the question it is that once grateful having made an
error of so much and so disastrous repercussion, let us be not calm, this
passes in any other aspect again, and I tell to you and all the enormous
quantity of political and economic leaders that the European Union prepares
that we can no longer make a mistake more. A thing is not to guess right and
another very different one is to make a mistake, the things don't have the
security of always leaving like one wait, but that that if it should not happen
it is that you make a mistake almost knowingly of the error that these making,
waiting that the time or the luck fixes it, this in politics always flaw and it
is also inappropriate of an organization of the importance of the European
Union.
I
am afraid that past the crucial moment in that we have moved away from the
cliff for the hair toward where we went, let us stop sweaty and still trembling
but with that sensation of "Uffff, almost", and this cannot allow it,
because if we are still looking at the cliff, the smallest blast of wind will
make us fall. I already know that I am very redundant in my opinion, but it is
that I believe that there is not another positive teaching of what happens to
us that to attempt so much globalized government's politics as the economic
district attorney of the European Union, and sincerely I don't see on the part
of the members of the euro group, neither of the entirety of the 27 that they
are neither so at least interested to study this solution.
And
they don't doubt it if this is not made, we will be making the "last error" after the one
which, they will no longer have neither you excuse neither possible
arrangement, the situation that at the moment have not saved alone it is not
definitive, but rather he has also left us headdresses for some years if everything
goes well, and the worst thing is that among half of this period, they will
have elections, new crisis, changes of political, etc. and don't unite of each
that it would be the advisable thing, but rather they are 27 possibilities
today in day, but that they can be but according to the plans of the treaty of
Lisbon (surprisingly not it contemplates that can be less, another bundle
error).
It
is too complicated to harmonize all this political and economic disparity, we
realize that they can have countries in that their politicians are socialist
for example other conservatives, for what the community guidelines can be
interpreted with different you even tinge being the same ones. This that would
not be a serious problem if doesn't affect anything but that to a strict
national environment, he takes disaster character when their consequences
transcend this environment, and they complicate the approvals of normative
community and the global economic politicians. He doesn't play me to my to
define as structuring the European Union, although I have manifested several
times my opinion in this respect, but I believe sincerely that it should be a
total priority being devoted entirely to find the system that is able to fuse
the dispersion of the states members in a single community politics.
Said
clearly it is necessary to get the Europa, alone true Union of States we will
be this way safe of new external attacks, and interiors that there are them of
having them, this way the possible errors of one didn't affect all for what to
isolate is problem and to solve it will be much simpler.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario