SPAIN THAT DAMAGE WE HAVE MADE YOU FROM CATALONIA?

Spain is wildly official (if he has it in functions) now this wrapped up one in some negotiations in this unusual country, to see if the second party in number of benches and resulting votes of the last general elections government can form, after the winner of the elections has been declared unable to get it and this inability is anything less because none of the other political leaders of the elected parties wants that it continues governing Spain for what is impossible to fulfill the legality of the investiture presidential and later government formation. 

Little joke is not a matter without importance because the problem continues growing since there neither are not among the other elects none that by itself can receive the unanimous approval of the other ones to be invested president that is to say nobody he wants the PP and the Rajoy, but neither nobody wants Pedro Sánchez and to the that complicated PSOE it is the political reality in Spain today the only difference that it exists in this situation it is that, as well as no party seems to want to group with the PP to support him if it is possible for the PSOE to get supports to get the government 

For this reason their majesty the King has asked him to try to make government to Pedro Sanchez instead of to Mariano Rajoy (the current president in functions) with all this the solution not you easy foresee and it seems that neither very quick (it is spoken of one month) among so much Brussels you begins to worry, the banking and the Spanish economy also, and the society in this situation cannot make anything, he has to wait to that the terms are completed foreseen by the law so that in the face of an impossibility that among the politicians they come to an agreement he should begin another time some new general elections among so much the Spanish economy is dragged down for the general circumstances of the world bewilderment and from alone Spain we can make that to pray so that they don't still affect us more the bad general perspectives for this 2016 Spaniard also. 

We could be speaking of the whole lost first trimester of the 2016 if this happens and maybe part of the second, we could even think that in the face of a second political failure some political or social force ends up conforming a simile suddenly of civil and political state and a government imposed before the Spanish official politics’ bewilderment. Anything of this last that expose he has foundation at the moment some, but if they don't get ready the things in this month he can that something like that happens I doubt that you end up carrying out some new democratic elections because the actors would be more or less also the same ones and the results. 

Before this drawing anyone would say that in Spain this is today per today the problem number one of the state that all are looking for a point of union to be able to form a government as mark the law, because not the problem number one of Spain today is the Independence of Catalonia. The most curious thing is that this fact puts to all the parties and its agreement leaders finish the political differences they forget the more and more big scandals of corruption and all absolutely all agree studies, or you proclaim that they are carried out in the government of Catalonia that this yes, it is not in functions. 

Curious truth but that we have made to Spain so that we are the nexus of union of all the Spaniards that if against our aspirations to be a sovereign country, we have not taken them the political confusion in that they are tangled, we have not taken the imputations of corruption to the PP neither we have organized them to We Can that it is little less than the antichrist for the Spanish politics and that the society has voted him in third position, we have not influenced in Rajoy so that it has refused to be invested twice by the king we have not chosen Pedro Sánchez in its place, we simply continue working we continue being the place of Spain with less unemployment, we are the one that more exports those that more tourism generates, and the only thing that we want is to be a tiny but enough sovereign nation. 

But I eat the leader of the PSOE he told them it rejects as the PP and Citizens the sovereignty process, (we Can it plays to the in definition) that is to say that if for Catalonia was he would already have Spain alone government it is necessary to join PP, PSOE and CIUDADANOS, and there is already majority of leftovers in the courts.  

But with all neither come to an agreement as giving a solution to the Catalan to see of getting that we don't want to separate alone Spain they come to an agreement in filing us sedition crimes and of telling us that we are not anything without Spain and that it is even lie that we exist and that we have invented ourselves the Catalan (language) to bother and to indoctrinate our children and those of the Spaniards that one comes to live to Catalonia because it is the Spanish community with higher purchasing power after the capital of Spain. While the Spanish Catalan or not, we support 20% of the Spanish GDP that we surrender to the Spanish treasure. 

For that reason he asked that we have made you Spain so that all unite to go against us, but now when arriving to these lines I have understood it, it is not that we have made anything to Spain it is that what Spain cannot support is that we become independent and don't have the Catalan GDP, neither the Catalan exports, neither the Catalan tourism, neither the Catalan industry, already put any reason able to unify it because like he said before it was not for the independence of Catalonia in Spain any political party neither no politician would agree on anything with anybody.    

ESPAÑA ¿QUE MAL TE HEMOS HECHO DESDE CATALUNYA?

España está sin gobierno oficial (si lo tiene en funciones) ahora esta envuelta en unas negociaciones en este país insólitas, para ver si el segundo partido en número de escaños y votos resultantes de las últimas elecciones generales puede formar gobierno, después que el vencedor de las elecciones se haya declarado incapaz de conseguirlo y esta incapacidad es nada menos porque ninguno de los otros líderes políticos de los partidos elegidos quiere que continúe gobernando España por lo que es imposible cumplir con la legalidad de la investidura presidencial y posterior formación de gobierno.

Poca broma no es un asunto sin importancia porque el problema sigue creciendo ya que no hay tampoco entre los otros elegidos ninguno que por sí solo pueda recibir la aprobación unánime de los demás para invertirse presidente es decir nadie quiere al PP y al Rajoy, pero tampoco nadie quiere a Pedro Sánchez y al PSOE así de complicada es la realidad política en España hoy la única diferencia que existe en esta situación es que, así como ningún partido parece querer agruparse con el PP para apoyarlo si es posible para el PSOE conseguir apoyos para conseguir el gobierno

Por esta razón su majestad el Rey le ha pedido que intente hacer gobierno a Pedro Sanchez en lugar de a Mariano Rajoy (el actual presidente en funciones) con todo esto la solución no se prevé fácil y parece que tampoco muy rápida (se habla de un mes) entre tanto Bruselas se empieza a preocupar, la banca y la economía española también, y la sociedad en esta situación no puede hacer nada, tiene que esperar a que se cumplan los plazos previstos por la ley para que ante una imposibilidad de que entre los políticos se pongan de acuerdo debería iniciarse otra vez unas nuevas elecciones generales entre tanto la economía española es arrastrada hacia abajo por las circunstancias generales del desconcierto mundial y desde España solo podemos hacer que rezar para que no nos afecten todavía más las malas perspectivas generales para este 2016   española también.

Podríamos estar hablando de todo el primer trimestre del 2016 perdido si esto ocurre y quizás parte del segundo, podríamos incluso pensar que ante un segundo fracaso político alguna fuerza política o social llegase a conformar un símil de golpe de estado civil y político e impusiera un gobierno ante el desconcierto de la política oficial española. Nada de esto último que expongo tiene de momento fundamento alguno, pero si no se arreglan las cosas en este mes puede que suceda algo así dudo que se llegasen a realizar unas nuevas elecciones democráticas porque los actores serían los mismos y los resultados más o menos también.

Ante este dibujo cualquiera diría que en España esto es hoy por hoy el problema número uno del estado que todos están buscando un punto de unión para poder formar un gobierno como marca la ley, pues no el problema número uno de España hoy es la Independencia de Catalunya. Lo más curioso es que este hecho pone a todos los partidos y sus líderes de acuerdo se acaban las diferencias políticas se olvidan los escándalos de corrupción cada vez más grandes y todos absolutamente todos están de acuerdo en que hay que atacar a Catalunya hacer que el Tribunal Constitucional derogue todas las iniciativas de leyes, estudios, o proclamas que se llevan a cabo en el gobierno de Catalunya que este sí, no está en funciones.

Curioso verdad pero que le hemos hecho a España para que seamos el nexo de unión de todos los españoles eso si contra nuestras aspiraciones a ser un país soberano, nosotros no les hemos llevado la confusión política en que están enredados, no les hemos llevado las imputaciones de corrupción al PP ni les hemos organizado a Podemos que es poco menos que el anticristo para la política española y que la sociedad lo ha votado en tercera posición, no hemos influido en Rajoy para que haya rehusado ser investido por el rey dos veces no hemos elegido a Pedro Sánchez en su lugar, simplemente nosotros seguimos trabajando seguimos siendo el lugar de España con menos paro, somos el que más exporta los que más turismo generamos, y lo único que queremos es ser una nación soberana pequeñita pero suficiente.

Pero como les decía el líder del PSOE rechaza como el PP y Ciudadanos el proceso soberanista, (Podemos juega a la indefinición) o sea que si por Catalunya fuese ya tendría España gobierno solo es necesario juntar a PP, PSOE y CIUDADANOS y ya hay mayoría de sobras en las cortes.

Pero con todo tampoco se ponen de acuerdo como dar una solución a los catalanes para ver de conseguir que no queramos separarnos de España solo se ponen de acuerdo en incoarnos delitos de sedición y de decirnos que no somos nada sin España y que es mentira incluso que existamos y que nos hemos inventado el catalán (lengua) para fastidiar y adoctrinar a nuestros niños y a los de los españoles que se vienen a vivir a Catalunya porque es la comunidad española con más alto poder adquisitivo tras la capital de España. Mientras los catalanes españoles o no, soportamos el 20% del PIB español que entregamos al tesoro español.

Por eso preguntaba que te hemos hecho España para que todos os unáis para ir contra nosotros, pero ahora al llegar a estas líneas lo he comprendido, no es que le hayamos hecho nada a España es que lo que España no puede soportar es que nos independicemos y no tenga el PIB catalán, ni las exportaciones catalanas, ni el turismo catalán, ni la industria catalana, ya puestos ningún motivo capaz de unificarla porque como decía antes si no fuese por la independencia de Catalunya en España ningún partido político ni ningún político estaría de acuerdo en nada con nadie.

THE STUDY OF COST OF REESTABLISHING THE FRONTIERS DOESN'T BELIEVE IT TO ME

 Today I read that the reestablishment of the frontiers in the breast of the space Schengen would cost France from 1.000 to 2.000 million Eurus to the short term year and up to 10.000 to long, it indicates the study diffused today, according to which the impact for the group of countries of that pact would be about the 100.000 million annual Eurus. 

The consultation organism France Strategies, clerk of the Government, points out that those most affected ones would be short term they arrived tourists of short stay of neighboring countries, the non-European tourists that want to visit several countries of Europe, the border workers and the traffic of goods by lorry. Hear the one that writes he spent half-life traveling in car through half Europe with included Schengen and the only cost that it suffered it was the time of stop if they stopped him to teach the passport and nothing else the same thing the trucks with goods etc. 

The structures of police control continue existing and the random controls continue being made Schengen it is simply a topic of elimination of tariffs for goods and capitals and this can continue existing although to cross from Spain to France you have to take out yourself the shoes like raisin in the airports it is that that you must cut the fact that they go by the space Schengen emigrant traffickers without control and terrorists but the tax concepts and of free circulation of goods they don't have to suffer more costs except for something of annoyance for if they are stopped to suffer a physical revision of load or documents. 

The study continues insisting in the disaster. Half of the contemplated cost it corresponds to the slope of the tourist flow, 38% to those workers and 12% to the control to the traffic of goods. Long term, according to that study, the generalization of the permanent controls would be equal to a rate of 3% on the trade of France with the countries of the area that it is calculated that it would diminish in a structural way from the 10 to 20%. all this is false the tourists and the business men like he said before they should simply teach the passport the goods the guides of transport and content, the tourists the passport and point and he/she ended. Now then, if that that the French government what is saying is that it would take advantage of the occasion to implant a tax to cross France or to record the goods of other countries to favor the national ones this is another thing this doesn't have anything to do with the main reason for which should recover the control in passing among countries of the Europe of the euro. 

The European Commission admitted by the middle of February that if there are not changes in the migratory crisis in Europe it could be justified to prolong the internal controls inside the space Schengen that countries like Germany and Austria already apply, but he/she emphasized that the moment has not still arrived of making that decision. 

France strategy notices that every year they visit France 83 million tourists; it calculates that it would rot it turns "seriously affected" if the abandonment of that agreement accompanied of the ceasing of the circulation Visa Schengen. French gentlemen don't worry if it is not that you are invented a canon of tourism the tourists we will continue entering or going to France will simply go provided of the European passport in order. 

Anyway, if you maintain this theory of increase of costs I ask them that to the biggest possible brevity they calculate which is the cost of the freedom of circulation of the masses of emigrants thanks to the treaty Schengen the maintenance of the surveillance and control the recession of the tourism that has already taken place for the fear to meet with manifestations in favor and against the immigrants the fear to be attacked annoyed and assaulted by un controlled that they wander for streets and neighborhoods of cities like Colony Paris they calculate what Greece is losing in tourism and when they have made it we compare to see who is right.  

EL ESTUDIO DE COSTE DE RESTABLECER LAS FRONTERAS NO ME LO CREO

Hoy leo que el restablecimiento de las fronteras en el seno del espacio Schengen costaría a Francia de 1.000 a 2.000 millones de euros al año a corto plazo y hasta 10.000 a largo, indica el estudio difundido hoy, según el cual el impacto para el conjunto de países de ese pacto rondaría los 100.000 millones de euros anuales.

El organismo de consulta France Stratégie, dependiente del Gobierno, señala que los más afectados serían a corto plazo los turistas de corta estancia llegados de países vecinos, los turistas no europeos que quieran visitar varios países de Europa, los trabajadores fronterizos y el tráfico de mercancías por carretera. Oigan el que escribe se pasó media vida viajando en coche por media Europa con Schenguen incluido y el único coste que sufrió era el tiempo de stop si le paraban para enseñar el pasaporte y nada más lo mismo los camiones con mercancías etc.

Las estructuras de control policial siguen existiendo y los controles aleatorios siguen haciéndose Shenguen es simplemente un tema de eliminación de aranceles para mercancías y capitales y esto puede seguir existiendo aunque para cruzar de España a Francia tengas que sacarte los zapatos como pasa en los aeropuertos es eso lo que se ha de cortar el hecho que pasen por el espacio Schengen traficantes emigrantes sin control y terroristas pero los conceptos impositivos y de libre circulación de mercancías no tienen por qué sufrir más costes salvo algo de incomodidad por si son detenidos para sufrir una revisión física de carga o documentos.

El estudio sigue insistiendo en el desastre. La mitad del coste contemplado corresponde a la bajada del flujo turístico, un 38 % a esos trabajadores y un 12 % al freno al tráfico de mercancías. Más a largo plazo, según ese estudio, la generalización de los controles permanentes equivaldría a una tasa del 3 % sobre el comercio de Francia con los países de la zona, que se calcula que disminuiría de forma estructural del 10 al 20 %. Todo esto es falso los turistas y los hombres de negocio como decía antes simplemente deberían enseñar el pasaporte las mercancías las guías de transporte y contenido, los turistas el pasaporte y punto y se terminó. Ahora bien, si lo que el gobierno francés lo que está diciendo es que aprovecharía la ocasión para implantar un impuesto por cruzar Francia o para grabar las mercancías de otros países para favorecer las nacionales esto es otra cosa esto no tiene nada que ver con el motivo principal por el que debería restablecerse el control de paso entre países de la Europa del euro.

La Comisión Europea admitió a mediados de febrero que si no hay cambios en la crisis migratoria en Europa podría estar justificado prolongar los controles internos dentro del espacio Schengen, que ya aplican países como Alemania y Austria, pero recalcó que aún no ha llegado el momento de tomar esa decisión.

France Stratégie advierte de que cada año visitan Francia 83 millones de turistas, cifra que podría verse “seriamente afectada” si el abandono de ese acuerdo se acompañara del cese de los visados de circulación Schengen. No se preocupen señores franceses si no es que ustedes se inventen un canon de turismo los turistas seguiremos entrando o yendo a Francia simplemente deberemos ir provistos del pasaporte europeo en orden.

De todas maneras, si ustedes mantienen esta teoría de aumento de costes les pido que a la mayor brevedad posible calculen cual es el coste de la libertad de circulación de las masas de emigrantes gracias al tratado Schengen el mantenimiento de la vigilancia y control la recesión del turismo que se ha producido ya por el miedo a encontrarse con manifestaciones en favor y en contra de los inmigrantes el temor a ser agredido vejado y asaltado por incontrolados que vagan por calles y barrios de ciudades como Colonia París calculen lo que está perdiendo Grecia en turismo  y cuando lo hayan hecho comparemos a ver quién tiene razón.

THEY ARE NOT CASUAL THE SOCIAL PROBLEMS OF SPAIN GOES TIED WITH THE BLINDNESS OF THE UE.

I believe that the century 21 keeping in mind the bases of the century 20 that are those that brought us here now alone they have lasted 15 years, I am convinced that or we change or everything will come the economy below, the productivity, and of course and I eat unavoidable consequence the society and this is passing in all the places that in the century 20 called the first world. Nobody that simply has a concern to analyze what is spending will have given bill that the society in the first world is dividing in two when in the century 20 were divided in three steps, this difference is not banal it is enough important so that he can tell them that the world is changing.  

The first world him Western Europe represented by the (UE) the USA is eliminating a part of the society that in the century 20 were the motor of the social economy I refer to the denominated middle class, there are opinions that accuse to the great technological transformation that the "rich" world is suffering of this phenomenon and a little if he will be necessary to agree with them because today and more and more the western society is divided between multimillionaires and employees and they are disappearing the rich class that I locate the autonomous producers, the very qualified titled professionals, the medium merchants, etc. this whole social scale is decreasing some little by little if they are lucky they leave up and, those that don't fall in a scale of poor society and behind there is still another scale that nobody worries about her that has already passed to range of having excluded social.   

Is the question How this can pass in the UE? because simply for the differences of the economies among the countries that the UE composes, and that they are reflected with the same effect inside each country, they are a ballast that it seems already impossible to balance and therefore one runs the risk that they change to the society and the way of life in the century 21 it changes substantially. I agree that it changes them the work or they lose it because it is without use or because they make it the you scheme etc., but another very important part is the euro when unifying the foreign currencies in a this has led to not being able to make this way in front of the crisis that began in 2008, today the high unemployment rates in the Eurozone and the substantial unemployment differences with USA, they are indications that show that the labor production in the Eurozone is not working as adjustment mechanism. 

The UE has too many variable and not equilibrators and this they go from the social typology in the UE going by the difficulty of the languages and the ideological or historical barrier between its members and some potential differences impossible to be more or less in a way balanced, it is an atrocity and we are seeing it, to want to treat the same problem in a country of more than 80 million inhabitants with the industry and the strongest economy in the group with the same recipes and the same foreign currency to another country with little more than 40 million inhabitants and without any possibility of competing with the industry and products of the big one don't want to put names I believe that all my readers will know to which refer.  

The physical constitution of the UE makes impossible to balance its economy the level of life of all its society and in definitive he makes impossible to think that this organization can survive much more time I know that I can end up me to make monotonous, but it is that I don't see neither I read any theory about this reality, everything is based as soon as the European economic or labor or social difficulties are studied the solutions and the problems they are guided to the important countries the big and central of the Union instead of looking that the problems that the UE will really collapse are in the small countries and ends that don't have possibility some of increasing its GDP and that its society you emprovece day after day and they don't realize there is already more European under these conditions than not in the other ones.    

NO SON CASUALES LOS PROBLEMAS SOCIALES DE ESPAÑA VAN LIGADOS CON LA CEGUERA DE LA UE.

Creo que el siglo 21 teniendo en cuenta las bases del siglo 20 que son las que nos trajeron aquí ahora solo han durado 15 años, estoy convencido que o cambiamos o todo se nos va a venir abajo la economía, la productividad, y por supuesto y como consecuencia inevitable la sociedad y esto está pasando en todos los lugares que en el siglo 20 llamábamos el primer mundo. Nadie que tenga simplemente una preocupación por analizar lo que está pasando se habrá dado cuenta que la sociedad en el primer mundo se está dividiendo en dos cuando en el siglo 20 se dividía en tres escalones, esta diferencia no es banal es lo suficiente importante para que pueda decirles que el mundo está cambiando.

El primer mundo le Europa Occidental representada por la (UE) los EEUU está eliminando una parte de la sociedad que en el siglo 20 era el motor de la economía social me refiero a la denominada clase media, hay opiniones que de este fenómeno culpan a la gran transformación tecnológica que el mundo “rico” está sufriendo y un poco si habrá que darles la razón porque hoy y cada vez más la sociedad occidental se divide entre multimillonarios y empleados y están desapareciendo los ricos clase que sitúo los productores autónomos, los profesionales titulados bien calificados, los comerciantes medianos, etc. Toda esta escala social está reduciéndose poco a poco unos si tienen suerte se van hacia arriba y, los que no se caen en una escala de sociedad pobre y detrás todavía hay otra escala que nadie se preocupa por ella que ya ha pasado a rango de excluido social.  

La pregunta es ¿Cómo puede pasar esto en la UE? pues simplemente por las diferencias de las economías entre los países que componen la UE, y que se encuentran reflejadas con el mismo efecto dentro de cada país, son un lastre que parece ya imposibles de equilibrar y por lo tanto se corre el riesgo que cambien a la sociedad y al modo de vida en el siglo 21 cambie sustancialmente. Yo estoy de acuerdo en que la evolución tecnológica que se sucede a una velocidad tremenda produzca grandes masas de personas que quedan descolocadas que les cambia el trabajo o lo pierden porque queda sin uso o porque lo hacen las maquinas etc., pero otra parte muy importante es el euro al unificar las divisas en una esto nos ha conducido a no poder hacer frente a la crisis que se inició en 2008, así hoy las elevadas tasas de desempleo en la Eurozona y las sustanciales diferencias de paro con EEUU, son indicios que muestran que la producción laboral en la Eurozona no está funcionando como mecanismo de ajuste.

La UE tiene demasiadas variables desequilibradoras y esta van desde la tipología social en la UE pasando por la dificultad de las lenguas y la barrera ideológica o histórica entre sus miembros y unas diferencias de potencial imposibles de tratar de una forma más o menos equilibrada, es una barbaridad y lo estamos viendo, querer tratar el mismo problema en un país de más de 80 millones de habitantes con la industria y la economía más fuerte del conjunto con las mismas recetas y la misma divisa  a otro país con poco más de 40 millones de habitantes y sin ninguna posibilidad de competir con la industria y productos del grande no quiero poner nombres creo que todos mis lectores sabrán a cuales me refiero.

La constitución física de la UE hace imposible equilibrar su economía el nivel de vida de toda su sociedad y en definitiva hace imposible pensar que esta organización pueda sobrevivir mucho más tiempo sé que me puedo llegar a hacer monótono, pero es que no veo ni leo ninguna teoría sobre esta realidad, todo se basa en cuanto se estudian las dificultades económicas o laborales o sociales europeas se orientan las soluciones y los problemas a los países importantes los grandes y centrales de la Unión en lugar de mirar que los problemas que de verdad hundirán la UE están en los países pequeños y extremos que no tienen posibilidad alguna de incrementar su PIB y que su sociedad se emprovece día tras día y no se dan cuenta  ya hay más europeos en estas condiciones que no en las otras.  

GOOD-BYE UNION EUROPEAN GOOD-BYE… THEY ALREADY COME IT UNTIL IN GERMANY

The differences of the economies of the component countries of the EURO, are a ballast that it seems already impossible to balance and therefore of making of the euro an appropriate foreign currency for such a heterogeneous group of countries and I take advantage of the occasion another time, to ask because it is more expensive a euro that a dollar. The euro has led to not being able to make this way in front of the crisis that began in 2008, today the high unemployment rates in the Eurozone and the substantial unemployment differences with USA, they are indications that show that the production and the labor mobility in the Eurozone are not working as adjustment mechanism.

 

The labor mobility is one of the fundamental approaches for the correct operation of a good monetary area, but it is also it that there is mobility of employment resources, that is to say an industrialization also homogeneous that allows the mobility, because if it is not this way, that it serves that an unemployed move if in the country of to the side neither is industries or work says it like want.

  

The benefits of a monetary union can be important provided the economic asymmetries that take place are absorbed in an efficient way. In case the monetary area is too heterogeneous, the problems could emerge in form of asymmetric interferences inside their members, because the monetary politics is no longer available, when having given the monetary sovereignty to an organism supranational. 

The economist Robert Mundell that won the prize Nobel of Economy for their studies on the monetary politicians and district attorneys low different exchange rates, and their analysis on the good monetary areas, published in the influential article 'To Theory of Optimum Currency Area', it points out that when a monetary union presents asymmetric shocks, these should be absorbed by "several adjustment channels to guarantee the long term viability of the union." 

 

These channels are those that allow that a monetary union works: mobility of the production factors, flexibility of wages and prices, certain opening grade, diversification and fiscal transfers. To these factors, it is necessary to add him others that have incorporated recently as the mobility free of the capital, the synchronization of the business cycle, stability of prices and some fiscal and political same politics objectives.

  

In a report published by Deutsche Bank it is shown that, from the explosion of the crisis in 2008, the labor mobility has been increased inside the area euro, what is without a doubt a good news. However, "the increment of the competition caused by the increase of the migration coming from countries unaware to the area euro is putting in risk the internal mobility of the Eurozone... Not alone the influence of refugees calculated in a million during 2015, the arrival of immigrants of countries of the east of Europe is also hindering the workers that come from the periphery of the Eurozone that now have more problems to find a work in Germany." 

The workers of some countries of the Eurozone are competing to obtain the same employments that the refugees, particularly in the segments of smaller wages, as well as the workers of the east of Europe are benefitting of their biggest English knowledge and German to find works with higher wages, it sentences the end of the report. 

 

That is to say, the Eurozone doesn't complete all the necessary requirements so that the countries benefit of the creation of a unique monetary area. One of the main factors that impedes the appropriate operation of the area euro is the drop labor mobility that right now even more danger runs for the arrival of the refugees and of workers coming from the east of Europe. This scarce labor mobility is preventing that the strong economic asymmetries are muffled inside the area euro, like it is the unemployment. 

The viability of the euro was already questioned in the zenith of the crisis of debt of the Eurozone, although the rescues and the intervention of the BCE have helped to maintain united the monetary area. The effectiveness of the monetary politics of the BCE, however, suffers of the economic divergences among the members and of its slow corrections. The DB recognizes that the labor mobility is very inferior to that of USA, a country that is usually studied as example of success of a monetary union. This situation of low labor mobility doesn't help to reduce the differences in the unemployment rate among countries, and for the same reason it is impossible to balance the national deficits. 

As consequence of the economic divergence among the members of the Eurozone, the work markets have left distancing until reaching alarming levels, especially in Spain and Greece, while in Germany the unemployment rate is falling to minima of the last years". This demonstrates that it is not so much the displacement of workers but of productions and industries in definitive of work positions because what demonstrates this fact is that the workers of the area euro and of the rest of the UE, if they move… but toward Germany.  

The economies neither the occupation rates are not balanced this way, conclusion the euro is not adapted for the current economy of the UE, another reason more than rational to outline that the UE should change structure politics and economic and be an area of free Common Market again, but maintaining the economic politicians, of development, of employment and fiscal, in being able to of each one of the partner’s members of this proposed European Common Market.  

ADIOS UNION EUROPEA ADIOS… YA LO VEN HASTA EN ALEMANIA

Las diferencias de las economías de los países componentes del EURO, son un lastre que parece ya imposibles de equilibrar y por lo tanto de hacer del euro una divisa apropiada para un conjunto de países tan heterogéneo y aprovecho la ocasión otra vez, para preguntar porque es más caro un euro que un dólar. El euro nos ha conducido a no poder hacer frente a la crisis que se inició en 2008, así hoy las elevadas tasas de desempleo en la Eurozona y las sustanciales diferencias de paro con EEUU, son indicios que muestran que la producción y la movilidad laboral en la Eurozona no está funcionando como mecanismo de ajuste.

La movilidad laboral es uno de los criterios fundamentales para el correcto funcionamiento de un área monetaria óptima, pero también lo es que haya movilidad de recursos de empleo, es decir una industrialización también homogénea que permita la movilidad, porque si no es así, de que sirve que un desempleado se mueva si en el país de al lado tampoco hay industrias o trabajo díganlo como quieran.

Los beneficios de una unión monetaria pueden ser importantes siempre y cuando las asimetrías económicas que se produzcan sean absorbidas de forma eficiente. En caso de que el área monetaria sea demasiado heterogénea, los problemas podrían emerger en forma de perturbaciones asimétricas dentro de sus miembros, porque la política monetaria ya no está disponible, al haber entregado la soberanía monetaria a un organismo supranacional.

El economista Robert Mundell que ganó el premio Nobel de Economía por sus estudios sobre las políticas monetarias y fiscales bajo diferentes tipos de cambio, y su análisis sobre las áreas monetarias óptimas, publicados en el influyente artículo 'A Theory of Optimum Currency Area’, señala que cuando una unión monetaria presenta shocks asimétricos, éstos deben ser absorbidos por “varios canales de ajuste para garantizar la viabilidad a largo plazo de la unión".

Estos canales son los que permiten que una unión monetaria funcione: movilidad de los factores de producción, flexibilidad de salarios y precios, cierto grado de apertura, diversificación y transferencias fiscales. A estos factores, hay que sumarle otros que se han incorporado recientemente como la movilidad libre del capital, la sincronización del ciclo de negocio, estabilidad de precios y unos mismos objetivos de política fiscal y políticos.

En un informe publicado por Deutsche Bank se muestra que, desde el estallido de la crisis en 2008, la movilidad laboral se ha incrementado dentro del área euro, lo que es sin duda una buena noticia. Sin embargo, "el incremento de la competencia causado por el aumento de la migración procedente de países ajenos al área euro está poniendo en riesgo la movilidad interna de la Eurozona... No solo el influjo de refugiados cifrado en un millón durante 2015, también la llegada de inmigrantes de países del este de Europa está dificultando a los trabajadores que proceden de la periferia de la Eurozona, que ahora tienen más problemas para encontrar un trabajo en Alemania".

Los trabajadores de algunos países de la Eurozona están compitiendo por obtener los mismos empleos que los refugiados, particularmente en los segmentos de menores salarios, así como los trabajadores del este de Europa se están beneficiando de sus mayores conocimientos de inglés y alemán para encontrar trabajos con salarios más elevados", sentencia el final del informe.

Es decir, la Eurozona no cumple todos los requisitos necesarios para que los países se beneficien de la creación de un área monetaria única. Uno de los principales factores que impide el adecuado funcionamiento del área euro es la baja movilidad laboral, que ahora mismo corre aún más peligro por la llegada de los refugiados y de trabajadores procedentes del este de Europa. Esta escasa movilidad laboral está impidiendo que se amortigüen las fuertes asimetrías económicas dentro del área euro, como es el desempleo.

La irreversibilidad del euro ya fue cuestionada en el cenit de la crisis de deuda de la Eurozona, aunque los rescates y la intervención del BCE han ayudado a mantener unida el área monetaria. La eficacia de la política monetaria del BCE, sin embargo, sufre de las divergencias económicas entre los miembros y de sus lentas correcciones. El DB reconoce que la movilidad laboral es muy inferior a la de EEUU, un país que se suele estudiar como ejemplo de éxito de una unión monetaria. Esta situación de baja movilidad laboral no ayuda a reducir las diferencias en la tasa de paro entre países, y por la misma razón es imposible equilibrar los déficits nacionales.

Como consecuencia de la divergencia económica entre los miembros de la Eurozona, los mercados de trabajo se han ido distanciando hasta alcanzar niveles alarmantes, especialmente en España y Grecia, mientras que en Alemania la tasa de paro está cayendo a mínimos de los últimos años". Esto demuestra que no es tanto el desplazamiento de trabajadores sino de producciones e industrias en definitiva de puestos de trabajo porque lo que demuestra este dato es que los trabajadores de la zona euro y del resto de la UE, si se desplazan … pero hacia Alemania.

Así no se equilibran las economías ni las tasas de ocupación, conclusión el euro no es adecuado para la economía actual de la UE, otro motivo más que racional para plantear que la UE debe cambiar de estructura política y económica y volver a ser una zona de libre Mercado, pero manteniendo las políticas económicas, de desarrollo, de empleo y fiscales, en poder de cada uno de los socios miembros de este propuesto Mercado Común Europeo.

CHINA THE EXCUSE TO JUSTIFY THE WORLD ECONOMIC FAILURE

China is leaving in evidence to the old economy or if you want the classic economy that that alone you see the beneficent of today but not those of tomorrow this way now the falls of the markets the threat of world recession all the wrongs of the economic world relapse in the Chinese it is a shame because it seems that the blame that the western world stops everything it is blame of Chinese. 

In my opinion he/she is just the opposite a Chinese he is giving a lesson of forecast economic Chinese it has used to the selfish western world to leave record at one time not to be anything in the economic and financial world to be the second world power and this in about 30 years. China now is an admired country anything belligerent he has business and investments where nobody wanted to invest I refer for example to southern Africa and South America he is good neighbor from Russia of the Asian countries there is even a certain good coexistence with Japan. 

China has arrived until here it has been placed in the top next to the USA and now the economic analysts want to give him the blame that the European and other economies stop because Chinese he stops how you can be so selfish alone they think a thing imagines that all the countries of the world grew to a rhythm of the half that makes it Chinese they imagine to Spain, France, Germany, Great Britain, Argentina, Russia, Brazil, etc. elevating its GDP in about 3,5 points where the world crisis would be. 

The smallest growth in China and the devaluations of the yuan have caused strong turbulences in the financial markets. Some economists assure that another global recession could be in road, however, the financial giant's analysts Allianz believes that the deceleration of China is not a cause so that the panic runs. Less bad than somebody you see it the same as me. That they sought the drone’s economists that Chinese had the obligation of continuing to the impish rhythm of growth so that everybody lives off her economy, Chinese has arrived to her roof of growth and thanks to that are 1,300 million they will be able to sustain I believe during another decade figures of growth of the GDP of entity 4y 6%. 

It is not Chinese the one that has to change is the rest of the world that has that to wake up. They are the oil tankers those that have to reduce the production of raw they have to locate the price among 50y 60 dollars the barrel this reactivated to Russia and the Middle East countries and Africa, South America, mainly Argentina and Brazil they should finish with their idiots political actions and of null planning and to be located in growth although it is little but what they cannot seek is that Chinese buys all the petroleum the whole grain the whole copper all the first matters while they are devoted to go of bad in worse.    

The GDP of Chinese increase 6.9% during the 2015 after registering an increment of 6,8% last year in the fourth trimester of the, as he announced today the National Office of Statistical. The fact that supposes the lowest annual increment in 25 years, belongs together with the Chinese Government's forecasts that he had noticed the goal of an increase of the GDP of "around 7% for the last exercise. This according to my interpretation is that Chinese has completely planned her development and now her stabilization because a country is not rubber as the globes that can leave swollen to will at the end as much the globe as the country would explode.  

The alteration of the pattern of Chinese growth is not a simple task. However, Chinese for their own size and their enormous population cannot leave that she stops suddenly would be very difficult to tolerate to 1,300 Chinese if the economy of the country stops. China will be as the USA another of the motors of the world and the same stability that he gives the economy of the USA he will give it China it is the remaining world the one that should stop to look at these two monsters so much and to change its mentality to take advantage of the force of these economies, but not to hope to only live off them. 

The consolidation of the process that the Chinese industry lives will continue beyond 2016 and anger falling gradually to pass to a level of maintenance investments and renovation, on the contrary, the private consumption will probably work well, such and like they are suggesting the smallest data of sales. Also, the Government and the central bank still have margin to muffle this descent reducing the coefficient of reservations for the banks and stimulated the credit to companies and matters". For everything it, "in the current deceleration of the Chinese growth, is not a cause to enter in panic. Without a doubt this tendency will continue during this year", but there are not reasons so that model's change has some substantial consequences in the rest of markets, whenever these they begin to see that they have that to wake ap.  

THAT THE POLITICIANS OFFER TO ANDALUSIA: TODAY THE PSOE GOVERNS IT AND THE PP MAINTAINS IT

After 33 years of socialist governments, the populated region in Spain continues under the worst social and economic conditions in Spain. Andalusia crawls, a serious structural problem that relegates it to the van of line of Spain, to its social problems has been added the reality of a systemic corruption now, after cases sounded as that of the fraudulent ERE or the formation courses to unemployed.  

As it can be that this it seals he has not been possible to correct from the Spanish democracy. It is evident that it seems that this situation that they suffer most of the eight long millions of inhabitants of the region is admitted and convenient for the Spanish esparto always represented by the PSOE and the PP. The reason that this is if it cannot be another that to the governments from Spain and their two national political parties (PSOE and PP) they find more economic to already maintain a social structure of poverty systemic that not to invest and to make improve the region has also become chronic the political situation of the region, it is always governed by the socialists of the PSOE it is the party that governs in Madrid. 

This has always gotten me the attention because Andalusia doesn't change government to see if some changes it the luck, but at the end you reach the conclusion that this cannot be and you realize when you analyze that when it has been the PSOE the one that Spain has neither governed Andalusia it has changed its social and productive structures, this is that is to say what takes me to the conclusion of the analysis both parties Spain it is already well he the situation of life of the Andalusian society based on the grants of all type, it is clear and it is for that reason that the PSOE should govern because it would not be well that a party of right as the PP closed the eyes and maintains this economic outline to coast of the public treasure.  

The grants like I say, they are the only entrance sources with which it counts the Andalusian region, it is the only thing that the governments from Spain have known to make more with good Andalusia and Extremadura and some region or autonomy during years and years to subsidize them, and it is clear that this system besides not modifying the situation above believes another reason that is that of the political corruption for that that who it leaves and it distributes he keeps the best part.  

But even in this section the differences of the autonomy are more and more accused with regard to Madrid, as well as in Madrid envelopes of money were distributed the politicians of the PP, almost Mafioso structures were created as the Gürtel and banks like bank Madrid  were despoiled, for the politicians' use and friends, in Andalusia of all this didn't have anything, alone they had left ERE (In the Spanish legislation, a File of Regulation of Employment) and the ambition of the politicians of the PSOE and Andalusians that administered them and that they have had the government of the region from the Spanish democracy. 

The populated community and the second more extensive of the country it has thanks to their work and the ERE the third bigger GDP of Spain (146.701 million Eurus in 2014), however, the ratio per capita continues in the penultimate place of all the regions, only for before Extremadura, with 16.843 Eurus, that is to say 25,2% inferior to the Spanish stocking. Worse it is the mark of the unemployment, because with a rate of 34,2% (21, % in Spain) it is the highest. The raw reality is that at the moment 1,4 million people don't almost have work in the community according to the EPA. That is to say, one of each four Spaniards in unemployment situation is Andalusian. 

It is evident that the priorities of Madrid for Andalusia have never been the development projects but simply of survival and memory that this is not thing of now already in the time of the dictatorship the best employment in an Andalusian was in Catalonia and I don't say it in a pejorative way because here they are wanted and they have been made with its place as some more Catalan, (that if there are always those that have not made it very to pleasure so that we will deceive) but the truth is that there are many more than the first ones that of the seconds although some Andalusian politicians deny it. 

Evidently, this reveals that the advances in the economy of the region have not been neither with a lot the prospective ones. The productive structure continues paralyzed in the weakest links in the chain - a very clear sample is that the thick of the oil is continued selling to bulk - and there are not expectations that other sectors arise with more added value than they take the relief together to that the crisis has brought I get the sinking of the construction and a new deindustrialization process that it has been fed especially with counties like Seville.  

Andalusia only represents the Spanish population's 18% and the GDP 13,8%. Also, its primary sector only overcomes this weight with 29%, while the contribution of the construction and the services are only of 14% each one, and the industry of 9%. the department of Economy of the University Loyola in Andalusia, affirms that "the crisis has demonstrated that the failure continues in the structure. As soon as the GDP one has come below, the unemployment has tripled arriving to rates of 36%. An economy cannot suffer that type of sways."  

Arrived to this point the Andalusians I suppose the same as I will wonder it is the next future that waits Andalusia, after the elections of the 20D on which they will mark a new starting point? Because this time in Spain is not clear neither that the PP governs neither that he makes it the PSOE and this should on one hand building up hopes them and for other to worry them because according to that government's composition has in Madrid it could happen that it is not willing to tolerate more ERE's and if more investments with that than the system of life of the society can go by many difficulties until they don't surrender these new proposals. 

But I don't see I that the things change in Andalusia will continue governing the PSOE (that is already making it) Andalusia was as always it has been to the line of Spain, because the governments from Spain wear out the taxes that impose the other Spaniards in their own political structures and in enlarging the capital, there they go for obligation the thick of the national investments, they are centralized by obligation all the neuralgic centers of the national economy, the neuralgic centers of the banking, of the sanity, of the industry, Spain everything is in summary there, in a space that you grieve it is the tenth part of Andalusia where 6,5 million Spaniards that they enjoy a GDP almost twice as much per capita of 30,000 Eurus live that an Andalusian Spanish. 

It is not necessary to give him more returned now they are you all the political parties promising improvements and more improvements for your community but you don't trust the certain thing a lot I fear myself it will be that the things will continue same or worse, because Spain goes to worse and for the Spain that sends and in theory it should distribute the few resources that we have it will continue making what has come making during years and during centuries, to stay the goods in the capital and to pass over the wrongs to the regions, your problem like the one of almost all is the same one, Spain, another thing it is that some they want to see it and other no. 

QUE OFRECEN LOS POLITICOS A ANDALUCIA: HOY EL PSOE LA GOBIERNA Y EL PP LA MANTIENE

Después de 33 años de gobiernos socialistas, la región más poblada de España sigue en las peores condiciones sociales y económicas de España. Andalucía arrastra, un grave problema estructural, que la relega al furgón de cola de España, a sus problemas sociales se ha sumado ahora la realidad de una corrupción sistémica, tras casos sonados como el de los ERE fraudulentos o los cursos de formación a desempleados.

Como puede ser que esta lacra no se haya podido corregir desde la democracia española. Es evidente que parece que esta situación que sufren la mayoría de los ocho millones largos de habitantes de la región es admitida y conveniente para el espato español representado siempre por el PSOE y el PP. El motivo de que esto sea si no puede ser otro que a los gobiernos de España y a sus dos partidos políticos nacionales (PSOE y PP) les resulta más económico mantener una estructura social de pobreza ya sistémica que no invertir y hacer mejorar la región además se ha hecho crónica la situación política de la región, siempre está gobernada por los socialistas del PSOE sea el partido que gobierne en Madrid.

Esto siempre me ha llamado la atención porque Andalucía no cambia de gobierno a ver si alguno la cambia la suerte, pero al final llegas  a la conclusión que esto no puede ser y te das cuenta cuando analizas que cuando ha sido el PSOE el que ha gobernado España Andalucía tampoco ha cambiado sus estructuras sociales y productivas, esto es lo que me lleva a la conclusión del análisis ambos partidos es decir España ya le está bien la situación de vida de la sociedad andaluza basada en las subvenciones de todo tipo, está claro y es por eso que debe gobernar el PSOE porque no estaría bien que un partido de derechas como el PP cerrara los ojos y mantuviese este esquema económico a costa del tesoro público.

Las subvenciones como digo, son las únicas fuentes de ingreso con que cuenta la región andaluza, es lo único que los gobiernos de España han sabido hacer con Andalucía bueno y Extremadura y alguna región o autonomía más durante años y años subvencionarlas, y está claro que este sistema además de no modificar la situación encima crea otro motivo que es el de la corrupción política por aquello de que quien parte y reparte se queda con la mejor parte.

Pero aun en este apartado las diferencias de la autonomía son cada vez más acusadas con respecto a Madrid, así como en Madrid se repartían sobres de dinero a los políticos del PP, se creaban estructuras casi mafiosas como la Gürtel y se expoliaban bancos como caja Madrid, para uso de los políticos y amigos, en Andalucía de todo esto no había nada, solo les quedaban los  ERE (En la legislación española, un Expediente de Regulación de Empleo) y la ambición de los políticos del PSOE y andaluces que los administraban y que han tenido el gobierno de la región desde la democracia española.

La comunidad más poblada y la segunda más extensa del país cuenta gracias a su trabajo y los ERE con el tercer mayor PIB de España (146.701 millones de euros en 2014), sin embargo, la ratio per cápita sigue en el penúltimo lugar de todas las regiones, sólo por delante de Extremadura, con 16.843 euros, es decir un 25,2% inferior a la media española. Peor es la marca del paro, pues con una tasa del 34,2% (21,7 % en España) es la más alta. La cruda realidad es que actualmente casi 1,4 millones de personas no tienen trabajo en la comunidad según la EPA. Es decir, uno de cada cuatro españoles en situación de desempleo es andaluz.

Es evidente que las prioridades de Madrid para Andalucía nunca han sido los proyectos de desarrollo sino simplemente de supervivencia y recuerdo que esto no es cosa de ahora ya en la época de la dictadura el mejor empleo de un andaluz estaba en Catalunya y no lo digo de forma despectiva porque aquí se les quiere y se han hecho con su sitio como unos catalanes más, (eso si siempre hay los que no lo han hecho muy a gusto para que nos vamos a engañar) pero la verdad es que hay muchísimos más de los primeros que de los segundos aunque algunos políticos andaluces lo nieguen.

Evidentemente, esto revela que los avances en la economía de la región no han sido ni con mucho los esperados. La estructura productiva sigue anquilosada en los eslabones más débiles de la cadena -una muestra muy clara es que el grueso del aceite se sigue vendiendo a granel- y no hay expectativas de que surjan otros sectores con más valor añadido que tomen el relevo, unido a que la crisis ha traído consigo el hundimiento de la construcción y un nuevo proceso de desindustrialización, que se ha cebado especialmente con provincias como Sevilla.

Andalucía representa el 18% de la población española y el PIB sólo el 13,8%. Además, sólo su sector primario supera este peso con el 29%, mientras que la aportación de la construcción y los servicios es del 14% cada uno, y la industria sólo del 9%. el departamento de Economía de la Universidad Loyola en Andalucía, afirma que "la crisis ha demostrado que el fallo sigue en la estructura. En cuanto el PIB se ha venido abajo, el paro se ha triplicado llegando a tasas del 36%. Una economía no puede sufrir ese tipo de vaivenes".

Llegados a este punto los andaluces supongo al igual que yo se preguntarán sobre cuál es el futuro próximo que le espera a Andalucía, tras las elecciones del 20D ¿marcarán un nuevo punto de partida? Porque esta vez en España no está claro ni que gobierne el PP ni que lo haga el PSOE y esto debe por un lado ilusionarlos y por otro preocuparlos porque según que composición de gobierno haya en Madrid podría ocurrir que no esté dispuesto a tolerar más ERE’s y si más inversiones con lo que el sistema de vida de la sociedad puede pasar por muchas dificultades hasta que no rindan estas nuevas propuestas.

Pero no veo yo que las cosas cambien en Andalucía seguirá gobernando el PSOE (que ya lo está haciendo) Andalucía quedara como siempre ha estado a la cola de España, porque los gobiernos de España se gastan los impuestos que imponen a los demás españoles en sus propias estructuras políticas y en engrandecer la capital, allá van por obligación el grueso de las inversiones nacionales, están centralizados por obligación todos los centros neurálgicos de la economía nacional, los centros neurálgicos de la banca, de la sanidad, de la industria, en resumen España está toda allá, en un espacio que apenas es  la décima parte de Andalucía donde viven 6,5 millones de españoles que disfrutan de un PIB per cápita de 30,000 euros casi el doble que un español andaluz.

No hay que darle más vueltas ahora os están todos los partidos políticos  prometiendo mejoras y más mejoras para vuestra comunidad pero no confiéis mucho lo cierto me temo será que las cosas seguirán igual o peor, porque España va a peor y para la España que manda y en teoría debería distribuir los pocos recursos que tenemos seguirá haciendo lo que ha venido haciendo durante años y durante siglos, quedarse los bienes en la capital y traspasar los males a las regiones, vuestro problema como el de casi todos es el mismo, España, otra cosa es que unos lo quieran ver y otros no.

S&P REDUCES THE RATING DE CATALONIA WITHOUT LOGICAL REASON

The news has just come out in the whole Spanish press salmon to first page that is reason of the holder of this first article I want to make consist that I don't consider it real (I don't say that it is lie) but yes that is presumably provoked for the own Spanish government. Anyway this that now will develop it has not prevented me to throw a Twit to the parties that lead the yes to the independence in Catalonia because it is already well of not making anything in favor of the project of independent because a thing is not to teach the letters that they are preparing (I suppose) and another very different one is to let that the opinion publishes us it shakes continually to slaps. 

This news has the whole appearance of being a "paid" note because it is not technically defensible in the form that is exposed and I refer to such a grateful economic newspaper as EXPANSION, the one mentioned note he says this way. The agency of rating Standard & Poor's has reduced the qualification of Catalonia until BB - with negative perspective for the excess of public debt of the community. The debt of Catalonia was already considered as 'voucher garbage', the previous qualification was BB. 

According to the same note published by the agency, this descent is due at the "very high level of debt of Catalonia" that is the autonomous community that has a bigger absolute volume of debt of Spain. According to the Bank of Spain, the debt of Catalonia ascends up to 67.855 million Eurus, what supposes an indebtedness of 33% on the GDP. These data are absolutely irrational and the problem doesn't go for these courses like S&P will reduce the qualification of risk of Catalonia if its debt level is of the lowest in Europe comparing it clear it is with its alone GDP as example the level of debt of Spain it is that is to say of 100%, 67 more points. 

They want more examples of that than I say there they have them: 

Catalonia GDP 205.621 million Eurus debt 67.855 million ratio 33% BB - 

Austria GDP 328.994 million Eurus debt 278.000 million ratio 84% AA+ 

Finland GDP 204.050 million Eurus debt 121.000 million ratio 59% AA+ 

Poland GDP 404.745 million Eurus debt 202.770 million ratio 50% A - 

This disqualification of Catalonia is not logical. The situation of slope of ratio of Catalonia is not for its high debt because it is low, what has happened here is that yesterday there was in Barcelona a political act of great reach in that the party more than extreme left that he has obtained 10 benches in the last Catalan voting’s manifested in this public act its base agreement to support to the winning party of the elections, and that with these 10 benches he acquires most absolute in the parliament. Government's outlines that the CUP (the leftist party) it supported they are really revolutionary for that reason they are of extreme left and this has scared Spain. 

Scarce days ago, the same agency, this agency of credit qualification elevated the rating of Spain a step, from 'BBB' to 'BBB+' with stable perspective. S&P highlighted in its official statement the positive impact of the reformations in the economy. 

The agency that confirmed the rating of Spain in its last carried out revision the past April 10, highlights that the economy of the country has benefitted of two reformations of the labor market from 2010 that have improved the competitiveness of the exports and of the sector services, (both sectors are led by Catalonia that means 25% of the exports and more than 30% of the services) as well as of some better financial conditions. 

If S&P has made at the last moment today Friday this note it is because Spain has given him a news that can be really devastating for Catalonia and this note cannot be another that Spain will close the cash flow that publishes from the country property and through the FLA it provides to Catalonia for the maintenance of the operative one of government of the autonomy and this it is the true Spain finds out S&P he cannot survive if Catalonia stops to be Spain someday but Catalonia he can stop to exist if that day it doesn't arrive soon.   

Sad paper and sad favor makes us and they are made Sirs of S&P, I believed that they were you some pirates but they had a code of honesty in spite of it (the Pirates had it) but not or they lend its name to who buys it to him or their actions can have some very serious repercussions because with countable falsehoods of this caliber they can end up causing until a small social disorder because some day or event can finish with the calm development and in peace that until these moments Spain and Catalonia are behaving. 

S&P REBAJA EL RATING DE CATALUNYA SIN MOTIVO LOGICO ALGUNO

Acaba de salir en toda la prensa salmón española la noticia a primera página que es motivo del titular de este artículo primero quiero hacer constar que no la considero real (no digo que sea mentira) pero sí que sea presuntamente provocada por el propio gobierno español. De todas maneras esto que ahora desarrollare no me ha impedido lanzar un Tuit a los partidos que lideran el sí a la independencia en Catalunya porque ya está bien de no hacer nada en favor del proyecto independentista porque una cosa es no enseñar las cartas que están preparando (supongo) y otra muy distinta es dejar que la opinión publica nos sacuda a bofetadas  a cada momento.

Esta noticia tiene toda la apariencia de ser una nota “pagada” porque no es técnicamente defendible en la forma que se expone y me refiero a un periódico económico tan reconocido como EXPANSION la citada nota dice así. La agencia de rating Standard & Poor's ha rebajado la calificación de Cataluña hasta BB- con perspectiva negativa por el exceso de deuda pública de la comunidad. La deuda de Cataluña ya estaba considerada como 'bono basura', la calificación anterior era BB.

Según la misma nota publicada por la agencia, este descenso se debe al "muy elevado nivel de deuda de Cataluña", que es la comunidad autónoma que tiene un mayor volumen absoluto de deuda de España. Según el Banco de España, la deuda de Cataluña asciende hasta 67.855 millones de euros, lo que supone un endeudamiento del 33% sobre el PIB. Estos datos son absolutamente irracionales y el problema no va por estos derroteros como van a rebajar S&P la calificación de riesgo de Catalunya si su nivel de deuda es de los más bajos de Europa comparándolo claro está con su PIB solo como ejemplo el nivel de deuda de España es del 100% es decir 67 puntos más.

Quieren más ejemplos de lo que digo ahí los tienen:

Catalunya PIB 205.621 millones de euros deuda  67.855 millones ratio 33% BB-

Austria PIB     328.994 millones de euros deuda  278.000 millones ratio 84 % AA+

Finlandia PIB  204.050 millones de euros deuda  121.000 millones ratio 59 % AA+

Polonia PIB     404.745 millones de euros deuda  202.770 millones ratio 50 % A-

Esta descalificación de Catalunya  no es lógica. La situación de bajada de ratio de Catalunya no es por su elevada deuda porque es bajísima, lo que ha pasado aquí es que ayer hubo en Barcelona un acto político de gran alcance en que el partido más de extrema izquierda que ha obtenido 10 escaños en las últimas votaciones catalanas manifestó en este acto público su acuerdo de base para apoyar al partido ganador de las elecciones, y que con estos 10 escaños adquiere la mayoría absoluta en el parlamento. Los esquemas de gobierno que la CUP (el partido izquierdista) apoyara son realmente revolucionarias por eso son de extrema izquierda y esto ha asustado a España.

Hace escasos días, la misma agencia, esta agencia de calificación crediticia elevó el rating de España un escalón, desde 'BBB' a 'BBB+' con perspectiva estable. S&P destacó en su comunicado el impacto positivo de las reformas en la economía.

La agencia, que confirmó el rating de España en su última revisión realizada el pasado 10 de abril, destaca que la economía del país se ha beneficiado de dos reformas del mercado laboral desde 2010 que han mejorado la competitividad de las exportaciones y del sector servicios, (ambos sectores son liderados por Catalunya que significa el 25% de las exportaciones y más del 30% de los servicios) así como de unas mejores condiciones financieras.

Si S&P ha hecho hoy viernes a última hora esta nota es porque España le ha dado una noticia que puede ser realmente devastadora para Catalunya y esta nota no puede ser otra que España va a cerrar el flujo de efectivo que desde la hacienda publica y a través del FLA proporciona a Catalunya para el mantenimiento de la operativa de gobierno de la autonomía y esta es la verdad España entérense S&P no puede sobrevivir si Catalunya deja de ser España algún día pero Catalunya puede dejar de existir si ese dia no llega pronto.  

Triste papel y triste favor nos hace y se hacen Sres. de S&P, yo creía que eran ustedes unos piratas pero tenían un código de honradez a pesar de ello (los Piratas lo tenían) pero no o prestan su nombre a quien se lo compre o sus acciones pueden tener unas repercusiones muy graves porque con falsedades contables de este calibre pueden llegar a ocasionar hasta un pequeño desorden social porque algún día o suceso puede terminar con el desarrollo tranquilo y en paz que hasta estos momentos se están comportando España y Catalunya.

CATALONIA AND THE CRIPPLE'S LIES

In Spain it is said “that he catches to a liar that to a cripple" the reason of this sentence rests before in that the lie or the falsehood, are discovered before and with more easiness with which it is caught a cripple that tries to escape. Today I will demonstrate them that there are many lies that are discovered with much more easiness of the one than the liar he would want. 

The president of Managers of Catalonia, Josep Bou, he has noticed last Thursday that "almost a thousand companies are had delocalized" during the sovereignty process (I suppose that he refers to several years ago non months) and he has requested to the Catalan that will never have voted that decant the 27S had "left constitutionalists." 

The managers say, we already have data of the damage that Artur Mas has caused and we don't want to think what would be the independence, the independence it would be a true nonsense", it has sentenced on the president of the Generalitat in an interview of Wave Zero. It has assured that the market is indicating that the process sovereignty is not the road: "the one on the way to Artur Mas it indicates the he swims, the concerns grow and the delocalization also grows." 

Mr. Bou has said that a foreign disinvestment has taken place, taking place that the investments of other countries in Catalonia lower until 15,8%, and "the Catalan voucher has been shot 40% ". He has added that to the markets it horrifies them the "madness of tearing Catalonia of Spain" and that the investors disappear with these independent statements of that, according to him, they have been loaded the spirit of the Catalan bourgeoisie and of the moderate catalane. 

Exactly for these reasons and other thousand more, we are looking for the independence, because notices Sr Bou without being been, we cannot prevent that the foreign investments are retained in Catalonia because for the centralist composition of the economy and the politics of investments is made from Madrid and neither we can avoid that the funds of Catalonia are expensive, because it is what the government from Spain wants to stay without economic encouragement, so you don't tell us anything new with these examples. 

But the curious of the case is that you, president of Managers of Catalonia doesn't count us that the capital of the companies constituted in Catalonia between the months of January and May of 2015 is of 516.9 million Eurus what represents an increment of 51.4% regarding the first five months of the 2014. And I didn't refuse you that it is in fact in these times, where the effervescence of the independentism is bigger, so it seems that the investments in new companies go ascending when more fence you is of the independentism. 

In a study diffused by the Chamber of Commerce of Barcelona it is indicated that 8440 mercantile societies have been created in Catalonia it calculates that it supposes an increment of 1% regarding the same period of the previous year. It is worthwhile to compare this evolution with that of the group of the Spanish state: in this same period the quantity of constituted companies, it has diminished 2.5% concretely 42.591 companies and he has also decreased the capital 4.3%. 

According to the last data corresponding to the month of May of the 2015, they have been constituted in Catalonia 1.662 societies what supposes an increment of 10.3% regarding the same month of the 2014, with a total capital that has grown more than 176% yearly. This already sees it in full preparation of the Catalan elections and with the independence to skin flower. But it is that this already comes from the 2014 that you began to notice a positive recovery in the creation of companies in Catalonia, since they were created in this year 17.823 mercantile societies that it was translated in an increase of 0.2% regarding the previous year. 

So already you see it all this it is a work of information on the part of the institutions created for these tools like it is the Point of Attention to the venturesome one, organization that I help to constitute 161 companies in 2014, this it is not the industrial and economic fabric that grows in Catalonia, alone without fear but hopeful that the independence will be favorable for the expansion of the productive and commercial economy, because he will open the doors of the international trade without obstacles neither problems of the "Mark Spain". So you don't worry about the companies that leave, because they arrive more than those that leave, this is unavoidable and logical at the same time for the own necessity of the companies but he doesn't have anything to do with the independence, as many as you determine to make see.  

And if the exports also reach a record of 32.000 million Eurus in the first semester of this year 7.9% above 4.9% that made it in all Spain and they already suppose 25.5% of the total of the Spanish exports, because that he wants that he tells him, welcome the concern of certain companies that they don't feel able to maintain the competition challenges and the managers' more independents productivity or simply more valiant.