THE STATE HAS TO DECREASE TO BE ABLE REACTIVATING OF THE COUNTRY

It is evident that the state should reduce its expenses that the state cannot be maintaining costs above its revenues, because in definitive this becomes against the society, since as always I say the society it is the state and vice versa, so when the state gets in debt those that we get in debt we are us, and those that also pay the contracted debts, but on the other hand if the state doesn't spend the country he stops. That demonstrates that the economic structure of the country is not well built. 

This cause effect, is due they don't doubt it to that the state has too many attributions and social economic services that not him per they play to make, the thing this in discovering if it is for blame of the society, or for ambition and self-centeredness of the political state, both possible causes of the problem have explanation and reasons to be justified, the bad thing is that this doesn't solve the problem. To the society it is he comfortable that the state solves him all the maximum one that he can, and so much so that it has created kind of a political credo that forces the ruler, it is necessary to be believed in the obligation, or maybe better he would say in the necessity, of having to offer the more better to leave chosen by the urns. 

So two selfishness, the social one and the politician join, and you arrives to ends of inability and impossibility of maintaining a situation economically unviable, let us see all that the state gives us or he makes, we find difficult our money, our capitalist and democratic system demands this way it, we want that the state assumes for our bill some functions that we consider essentials for the society: Order, security, sanity, education, public transportation, public infrastructures, etc. and we want or we seek that this almost is free for the society, that cannot be among other things for something as simple as that to make these services, members of the society are needed that work in them, and therefore that they receive some emoluments in form of fair wages and of chord with the labor world. 

To where I want go to stop with this that seems one it authenticates platitude, because to that realize that against but state, but costs, but at the same time against but state more employment, but less GDP. And this is a hairspring that the state cannot continue against more cutting its costs, not alone we clip ourselves all but services but rather we also believe more unemployment. That it is necessary to make then, it is clear to reduce the state to the kitten and to enlarge the benefit of services to carry out for private means. If they understand it well, the terrible word that the unions and the slackers hate of for yes, it is necessary to privatize more. 

That doesn't remove that the state can plan a grant system to the society, to help to the payment of many services that considers opportune to subsidize for its social sense and of national interest, but of that to take the responsibility of its executorships an entire world goes, because the state doesn't have another source of revenues that the taxes are direct or indirect he gives same, and the works that the society forces him to execute him force to be loaded of officials, and when one is an official it is but state that the one that is not it, because at the same time that he pays to the state it gets paid of the state with what is a money that he/she goes in definitive and it returns without creating any palpable benefit neither to the society neither the state. 

Absurdity truth to that they had never thought it go but it is this way, they will see an example, I pay my taxes to the state with a money that I win myself by means of the work in a private company that he believes an added value that it markets and it contributes wealth to the country in form of GDP, but an official pays his taxes with the same money of the state the same one that I contribute before, because it is of the state of who receives it, it is the state the one that pays him it nominates it and of these emoluments this official pays his taxes, it is what I say round trip money, eye that nobody sees in this neither a recrimination neither a protest neither an offense against the officials, this is mounted this way always, what I mean is that it is a wrong economic business the one that the state lends services. 

The state should come off and to privatize all administration type and like he said before this it doesn't remove so that according to its possibilities, remember that they are ours because I won't get tired of saying it, the state is us, it should organize a system of grants or refunds, or even exclusions of payments, to according to what cases in those that it will be the own state the one that runs with the expenses or costs of the borrowed service, but it should not end up never showing the administration of the same ones because this neither believe wealth neither effectiveness competencies neither productivity.  

If this doesn't leave the ball it will be this way every bigger time because the alone money arrives if there is material consideration it is clear this truth, the taxes without production are not sustained they ruin to the state and the society this it is the problem of Spain and it begins to be it of europa and it is necessary to get that he enters in our economy fresh and new money it is necessary to look for investments it is necessary to come off of unnecessary and already obsolete public goods looking for them an application although he seems to throw its nostalgic value, but it is necessary to put them to produce added value and the same thing the administration of services of the state.