MI ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN (REACTIVATION OF THE ECONOMY)

Continuing with the imaginary argument that I am in full electoral campaign to be the future president from Spain, today I want to outline that opposed the politicians of cuttings that it is apparently the tactics imposed by the organisms and rich towns to the poor towns, it is curious but it is this way. I don't remove the reason part to this since theory it is evident the necessity to reduce expenses or at least to control them, they are the global economic circumstances. But what doesn't serve as anything, is that he only decreases, if alone this action is made more and more he goes away the exit of the tunnel, or said already parodying our president almost in functions otherwise, if one doesn't water the earth the green buds they won't leave. 

So what I will outline today, is as beginning to reactivate the economy, and to get it the first thing that it is necessary to make they are three actions: to increase the collection of the state recording selectively with direct taxes to those that can pay more. To reactivate the productive activity, and of investment of the companies, and I+D I finish to reactivate the benefit of credits on the part of the banks.  

The first point to expose is to increase the tax collection through the IVA, I don't believe in taxes for rich based on the double impositions like it happens with the patrimony tax, everybody agrees, it is not cause of more repercussion again, with it what will be gotten is that or leave the country or that they look for the legal trap to hide it. My proposal goes guided to record what the fortunes can be allowed, or not as they choose that is the deluxe article, that is gotten through the IVA. 

Let us see the IVA he has several tax steps that serve so that they affect but exactly to what they have to affect, and not to all equally, so leaving of the one climbed current: General IVA: to 18%; reduced IVA: to 8%; IVA reduced super: in 4%, it would propose a climbed superior, for some deluxe qualified articles, the serious figure of 21%. These measures would be always conditioned to the real necessities of the economy, that is to say if there is reactivation and it is not necessary it is suppressed, my idea is simple, the one that a car can be bought of more than 25,000 € that page an IVA of 21% (he/she won't come him from 750 € that is the difference among the 18y the 21) the same thing the one that can buy for example for gift a clock of great range of 6000 €, neither will come him from 180 € but and as these multitude of examples, he will also always be able to choose to spend or not. 

Once commented the form of obtaining bigger revenues without loading the one that is not able to or to the one that doesn't want, we will reactivate the economy by means of allowances of the tax of benefits of the managerial entities they are already big or small that are those that should reactivate the economy and the employment, the thing it is simple of defining: Reduction on the tax of benefits of 15% of the capitals invested in: Technological renovation and of production, and investment and costs in I+D, and other 15% additional and cumulative in the cost of personal of new recruiting, in the first year of the same one, (in this last case independently of other direct reductions to the recruiting). These reductions on the tax of benefits would be it doesn't stop a single year, but for a period of 5 year-old minimum. The companies cannot make marvels, if alone they are given a term that is not good to plan the action to discount. 

I explain to myself, one cannot give an allowance that you can complete in so short space of time as it is a fiscal exercise, if I am a manager and I want to take advantage of these measures, I should can to plan the results, and I assure them that the investments in technology and personnel don't have effect in some months, I need one or two years like minimum, and then a period of maintenance and consolidation, of the own measures, because it is very probable that my the first two year-old investments, don't generate me benefits of where to make up for, I need more time so that when my production increase and productivity give me results, then if he can deduce me the allowances, to those that I have become worthy for my actions and investments. 

As to activate the credit and to reward to the banks for it: Because with the same system that to the company to discount them through the same tax of benefits and with reference to: The new recruiting of personal, and to their productivity, and which is this very simple since productivity the quantity and quality of the granted credits, (don't mortgage) we speak from credits to the managerial productive fabric and the consumption. To the banks he has to be them much more profitable to give credits that to put their surpluses for example in the BCE.  

So the sum of the credits granted for the reactivation of the industry and of the consumption, less the figure of doubtful of the same ones, would give place to the application of the amount to deduce from its tax of benefits, also in a similar percentage to the industry, as well as the costs of new employees' recruiting would give right to the application of the other allowance factor. In both cases the duration of the measure would be equally for a 5 year-old period. 

I assure them the effectiveness of these measures, in the first one the state would obtain more revenues and in second o'clock he would obtain a tremendous expense reduction I publish, for the reduction of the unemployment and for the indirect taxes that he would receive for the reactivation of investments, increase of exports, internal consumption, etc. - (Pity that doesn't introduce me to President) -.