THE GLOBALIZATION HAS THE SAME EFFECT THAT THE COMMUNISM

In many of my comments I recriminate basically to the capitalist and western world that the economic, Industrial, and commercial globalization, is a true failure I believe that the time and the problems that already extend in all the world economies (some more than other) they agree with me.  

Today two news jump in press that they go bolstering my opinion: Japan requests to the UE that solves the problems of the euro, because the situation of the same one in frank recession, puts in risk to the Japanese industry, this confirms it the fall of the Nikkei. Another curious news are the one dated in London by the agency Reuters: - The world economy could support a derived widespread dysfunction of a great natural disaster or of an extremist attack, during hardly one week, he said on Friday a report of the group of experts with headquarters in the United Kingdom Chatham House. 

The frequency of the natural disasters, as phenomena climatic ends, seems to be growing and the globalization has increased its impact, according to the report. Episodes like the cloud of ashy volcanic of 2010 that interrupted the air traffic in Europe, the earthquake and tsunami of Japan and the floods of Thailand the last year, they show that key sectors and the company’s can it turns gravely affected if the dysfunctions to the production or the transport are prolonged during more than one week. 

The world economy at the moment is fragile, what leaves it particularly vulnerable to not foreseen blows. Until 30 percent of the gross interior product of the developed countries it would rot it turns directly threatened by the crisis, especially in the sectors of factories and tourism, In general, the governments and business are not well prepared to respond to events not predictable of high impact.  

Indeed the globalization has chained and supplemented the resources, and I also eat compensation the problems, what is evident makes them more difficult of solving when these they appear, what in its day the western economy thought that it was the panacea to enlarge its business and its markets, exporting them to other confines in order to be able to grow more, I don't calculate that the only thing that made was to win bread for the moment and hunger for the future, I eat now it is demonstrated in all the environments, in the economy, in the industry, and in the own society. 

I will put an example taking advantage of one of the big cataclysms happened recently. It happens an earthquake in Japan and they stop many factories of automobiles in the USA, in Europe and in China to give an example, immediate effect the wrongs of the Japan you globalized immediately, consequence all the economies you stopped, and that it happens, because that they are without possibility of helping the Japan, because all are affected. That it would happen without the globalization before the same problem, the industry of the country affected by the cataclysm would stop equally, but the other ones not, with what the other economies would be in full activity and perfectly they could go in help of the economy and of the country affected to minimize the disaster. 

I don't want to insist in the wrong that it has produced the globalization when unbalancing the economies and the world industry, but maybe it would be necessary to return on the topic, the world production in spite of the adjective not this globalized, but rather in fact it is distributed and he has accumulated in a hemisphere and it has vacated to the other one, the economy and the finances are exactly same, they have not been distributed or globalized like it is sought to say on the part of those that take advantage of the circumstances, but rather in these moments some get paid and others pay, the first ones grow and the seconds they fall hopelessly. 

I have reached the conclusion that the globalization has the same journey and effect that in its day tube the communism. This politics sought to equal to the society where it was imposed, it sought to improve the abysmal differences among the social classes some few ones very opulent and other many very impoverished and with true problems of subsistence. The philosophy was the same one to distribute or globalized the resources in the whole society, very last the first fifty years when already the whole society more or less globalized was, we meet with a situation where most simply solved the basic thing, where the old ones rich and powerful they continued being, although with different nomenclatures and with its hidden reality or carried out outside of the global environment. 

To the 75 years of the communist social globalization, the own society said coarse allows us to be you not liberate us globalized more, I want to be another thing I don't want this uniformity that forces me to be what the system wants, and I knock down the system and already never more it revived again, and hear the change it is very visible, with all its defects what you want, but the initiative, the possibility to be and to make what one can and know, it is much more effective and he gives much more freedom and well to be to the society that he said in its day coarse 

The world globalization is continuing for the same steps, it is not a political system but it is an economic system that unifies that the initiatives that it spreads to equal for the low part to the society and the work breaks down that if we don't say coarse it compared us to all in a measure of which have left already for a hundred years, we will end up depending so much some of other that will get lost the competitiveness for that will be impossible to carry out it, because to make a thing we will need to coordinate I don't know how many societies governments and economies, and this is already known how it finishes, rather it doesn't begin, therefore never it finishes being carried out, and the world goes this way back and forward I don't eat he has gone for thousands of years. 

It is necessary to return back another time, it is necessary to rearm our societies and our industrial potentialities and to compete I never eat, it is the only way to balance the economy and once balanced, to continue competing to still improve more, it is the only and natural way to advance that he has the humanity, it is not warp neither natural to seek that some work and other they enrich of it, this was the principle of the globalization although they disguised him of equality and sociability was not this way, and today we are paying it in fact those that we spend of clever.