It seems already truly the game of the nonsenses, the IMF, the European
commission, the BCE, all demand changes to the economies of the Eurozone
Germany it seconds them, but the alone changes take place in the outlying
states that don't agree but that they depend on their execution although it
costs them to put in danger to their societies and their own productivity.
Result the European economy collapses, then so that we want a Union, so that we
need a European economy, if we don't know how to manage it, better it would be
to break it and to enter again in the national competition of each economy in
front of the other ones.
Made this introduction wants to pass to outline the one that I believe it
is the solution for the European Union regarding its global economy. Me
diagnosis is that the European Union seeks to stabilize an economy based on the
euro that is very above its reality and possibilities, I believe that
incomprehensibly the Union Europe, wants to agree with to the German theses
regarding the competitiveness and to the productivity, and for consequence to
the economic strength. And God willing can be made, but somebody has to see the
reality and to expose it, so much to government's advice in Brussels, like to
Germany. The conglomerate mosaic of nations that they form the current European
Union and more concretely the euro area in no way cannot sustain the productive
economic ratios of Germany, it is impossible from the structural point of view
and me he/she would say that physically.
An economy based on the industrialization and the commercial surplus as the
German sustained by 82 million inhabitants, is impossible to expand it to more
than 350 million inhabitants, (alone in the euro area), and much less to more
than 500 million of the current European Union. Let us be sensible if him GDP
of Germany you extrapolates like standardize for the whole union, the macroeconomic
figures would jump to the impossible thing we see if not, the GDP of Germany is
considered more or less in 2.8 trillion Eurus 34.500 Eurus per capita. The GDP
of the rest of the euro area is that is to say of 7,2 trillion Eurus about
30.000 Eurus per capita, that tells us that the area euro to be equaled, its
global GDP of 10 trillion should increase to 12 trillion Eurus some this 2 trillion
in percentage the Eurozone 20% it should grow more and this should be made in
the countries of the south and France not in Germany.
These macroeconomic figures leave well to the white that one cannot make an
economic politics in Europe, to image and likeness of Germany for the whole
context of countries, it is necessary to break this idea or it is necessary to
organize compensations it is necessary to carry out plans of relocation of
productions or what is wanted, but you cannot seek that Greece has a GDP like
Germany, it is absurd and impossible, I don't say it in pejorative sense to the
Greek society, it is that he doesn't have possible infrastructure the own
country for it, another fundamental point also exists, if the euro area ends up
expanding its GDP to the analyzed figures, where it would place its production
of where it would take out its commercial surplus, we should flood the China
and the USA of products "Made in UE."
This whole reasoning comes for the continuous fact of the German economic
positions, supported by the world institutions as the IMF, Germany seeks and
Europe doesn't deny it that the deficits is balanced to solve the sovereign
debts, debts that are been in fact of 15 years to have passed trying to balance
the social rents of the inhabitants of the area euro, without controlling that
this could not be, without appealing to its leverage by means of the creation
of sovereign debt have been made this way and now we have problems because it
is necessary to correct the deficits behind without any real productive
support.
We don't go this way anywhere except to the total ruin, the area euro what
has to make once and for all is to accept this reality and dimensioned their
economy to locate it at the true level of the group of the countries of the
euro, and assuring it face to the external markets, fact that would allow him
to resurge with certain force. I believe that the plan of investments that
Juncker is proposing is a good solution it is necessary to invest in
productivity and in structures and not in debt but it is necessary to make
these investments where they are necessary and this can be the hardest thing of
everything and what brakes the intervention of the public investment that is
vital in the plan Juncker.
According to my approach the investments should go to the poor area of the Eurozone
and of the UE and not to Germany to give an example are not able to or we
should not make stronger to Germany because if we make it every time we make
weaker to the rest and this is not good for the own German economy because at
the end he was left that is to say without potential clients it will lose
anything less than a market of more than 200 million consumers that will be
ruined and they won't be able to buy German products and we will be grass of
the Chinese products to give an example.
It is evident that this should be a well negotiated and directed plan
because the possible private investors can happen that alone they want to
invest in the rich economy of the Eurozone (Germany and their influence area)
and this should correct and to guide the investments to balance the poor
economies so that their increase of productivity supplements and enlarge the
economy of the euro area, and for I finish I wait that the ascents of interests
that the FED announces for the dollar, he will help but it is urgent that the
euro is devaluated for if same, not because the dollar ascends, because this
will maintain the high euro for the rest of the world economy, it is necessary
to devaluate so that it is an advantage to buy products of the area euro in
front of the market dollar. Alone with some macroeconomic adjustment measures
they will be able to leave the well in that you/they are more than 50% of the
economies of the Eurozone.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario