IF THEY KNOW THE CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE THEY DON'T ADVANCE THE SOLUTIONS

According to a study elaborated by Moodys, the terrorist attacks as those that have suffered some advanced countries "damage the economic activity and the investment" considerably. The agency of credit qualification has concluded that the terrorist attacks of March 11 2004 in Madrid, the same as those of 2001 in New York and those of 2005 in London, had a "significant" impact in the economic activity and the investment that it has lasted several years.  

Moody's has analyzed the economic impact that they had the attacks of September 11 2001 in United States, of March 11 2014 in Spain and of July 7 2005 in United Kingdom that they caused "significant human losses and damages in infrastructures". In each one of these cases, the effect in the economic activity and the investment was significant and it lasted several years", the agency of credit qualification that has analyzed the impact in short in the investment, the public expense and the cost of indebtedness of the public administration concludes.  

The vice-president of Moody's Merxe Tudela highlights that, for example, in 2013 the ten countries more affected by the terrorism they suffered an "immediate and significant" impact in the growth, since its GDP decreased for it between five and tenth eight. But it is still worse the fact that the negative impact continues during years after the attack, since it takes until five years that its effects disappear", Tudela adds. Also, the agency adds that she has an even bigger immediate impact in the increase of the investment that decreases between 1,3 and 2,1 percentage points in the same scenario.  

On the other hand, Moody's adds that the study, for which a sample of 156 countries has been selected between 1994 and 2013, reveals that the attacks have concentrated on some few countries. In fact, 60% of all those made in 2013 only correspond to four countries, mainly Iraq (24%) and Pakistan (19%).  

The analysis of the agency indicates that without attacks terrorists between 2008 and 2012, the GDP of Iraq had been 8,2% superior and its cost of lower indebtedness 150 percentage points at the end of this period. In the case of Pakistan, the GDP had been 5,1% bigger and the cost of inferior indebtedness 100 basis points. In this same scenario, the level of investments in Pakistan could have been 9,3 bigger% and that of Iraq 15,1 bigger%. "When we extrapolate these figures, we see that Iraq and Pakistan have lost thousands of millions of dollars in GDP and investment", Tudela adds. 

Onlooker comparative rehearsal that clearly it seems fact to late because what tells us is an obviated that we all know, any catastrophe either natural or caused by terrorism, it retards the economy of any place where it happens, it is certain that the later repercussions are different because in the case of natural disasters they cause a macabre but interesting reactivation of the economy of the country because the result of the catastrophe is the reconstruction or repair of the facts and it produces some monetary helps and materials on the part of organizations and states mundiales.se he could say in these cases and like comfort that. ”There is not bad that for well he doesn't come." 

They are very different the terrorist repercussions because the material damage goes accompanied by the loss of human lives and these they are irreplaceable and usually except terrorism of war case that now it happens in Syria and in the whole next east the material damages are very reduced in comparison to the loss of made lives these reflections of the study of Moody's keep the figures that are very interesting and they demonstrate the damage that takes place with the terrorism. 

Arrived to this point the question that comes out alone it is if really all this the solution is known it is not alone in quantifying it, but in avoiding it, you cannot avoid the isolated or impulsive terrorism, but that that yes one can make it is to finish for the force if it is necessary, with the consolidation of regimens organizations and countries that consider this action like a weapon of war disguising her of human uncontrollable impulses.