WHY IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO SPEAK ABOUT MODIFYNG OUR CONSTITUTION?

That it happens us to the Spaniards that he scares us to change something, we don't realize that the situation in that we are is largely for this cause, Spanish is questioned few things, anything would say me, this makes him selfish, fearful, accommodating, and not very incisive before the important topics and mainly, unworried and banal. Don't recriminate me my words I am also Spanish, but this doesn't deprive me of judging us before the situation in which we are heading. 

This posture is not new by no means if not just the opposite this form of being comes from the social education received during centuries. This social culture comes given partly because our benign climate, in comparison with the continental Europe, it has allowed that the life in this native floor, have been relatively easy, the medieval societies in fact alone they had two things for those that to worry: to hide of the church to live and to enjoy a point in sin, and of the noblemen so that they didn't recruit them as soldiers, but nothing else to eat and to live had always been easy, the mount with the hunt, the sea with the fishing, the field with the fruits and the benign climate, they didn't kill anybody, then so that to worry.   

How different it was this situation in the continental Europe, there the individual could not survive alone, in the center and European north or they united in society (tribes) and they leaned on some to the other ones, or when arriving the winter like doesn't have I cover and eaten stored you were dead, and this is that simple and easy of understanding, the necessity believes habit, I inhabit, sense of the association, of being needed each other, not already alone to fight to conquer or to defend, it doesn't stop something as simple as to survive. 

This introduction believes that it is necessary to clarify that what I criticize neither it is banal neither it is punitive, but real and natural and this Spanish takes it in its genes, we are this way the gentlemen of the "no" of the one "that but he gives" from the one "to me this gives me same" "I would make it better "if man I will pay you attention" and one very serious "that blow will stick but this doesn't go with I crumb". until running of the centuries has brought us until here, until a new social and economic moment in that I eat in the climates hard of Europe, if you don't lean on and if you don't work in group, in narrow association of forces, when it arrives the hour of the truth you die such and I eat it is happening us now. 

We need to change to everything to run, so much at individual level as social, no longer voucher that some send and direct like want the country and we say "this he doesn't go with I crumb", while he can make what gives me the desire that they make what they want, more or less it is no longer possible to live this way, if the one that sends flaw, or he deceives you, or he hides the reality, or it is wasted your flows, when it arrives the winter you die without remission some, so it will be necessary to consider worrying more about all the concerning one to the flows, to the freedoms, to the rights in short to that they don't steal you your well-being neither the one of yours. 

And arrived to this point it is when I outline the necessity to change our law of laws, that is to say the Spanish constitution, because this constitution has not been worth us no matter how much the Spanish politicians, all say that if, alone it has been worth them that it has raised them and high to unreachable and distant positions to not being able to more than the social reality of the country, but to the society he has it totally defenseless, he cannot make anything before an abuse or an inefficiencies proven as the one that we come suffering for some years and mainly some months. 

It is clear that the last years of the legislature of the PSOE and the first ones of that of the PP have been and they are disastrous, the society is not according with what happens, but we cannot make anything legally, we don't have access to any instrument that allows us to say course, this is not what we want, it is not what they promised us, or simply this has not given the result that we waited. And this is this way because among other causes we ignored governing in "democracy", so now that we take a thirty of years with her and that there is awake, because we don't look why result he has not given that we lack that we have more than enough and we fix it, to have if in thirty years more, already the continuous thing being effective for the society of then. 

I believe that our constitution has too many shortcomings, almost all created by the inexperience and the fear to that a new dictator that gives to the fret with everything, doesn't return and this is noticed, too much bureaucracy, too many officials, too many entities, too many tribunals, too many politicians, and so that it has served all this, to ruin to the country, and the worst thing from everything to the society and the most unusual thing is that if the society wants to change something, or he waits four years, or it organizes a revolution, it is clear that here it fails something. 

I don't understand I repeat because it doesn't seem possible to change the constitution, it is clear that the one that today governs us has not worked, he has not known how to brake the mess of the politicians, of the banks, of the judges, of the autonomies, of the King, in definitive it has not controlled the situation, or said from another optics, it has been allowed to manipulate very easily for the politicians interested in that is not open to the society, if not that almost acts like shield that the isolates them from this society to which they should serve in right.