IT IS NECESSARY TO PRIVATIZE MOR AND TO WORK LESS

We have to change, we cannot continue anchored in the old customs for very effective that have been, it arrives a moment that for circumstances unaware to our will the things even, change and we should change with them, the first thing that we have to think is that here nothing else won't be that our own time of life, therefore we cannot cling to our customs or beliefs and we don't have to be afraid to the changes because maybe we don't live them. 

The economic situation partner and politics that he has played us to live now, require a total turn that it is safe, it is clear that to continue making the things equal as up to now it doesn't work, the causes are countless, the immigration, the European union, the autonomies, the technology, the politicians in excess, the fourth to be able to without control some, the third world that has become the first one, everything influences, the consequences, we don't have work for all and the one that there is different, we cannot hope potato pays us well the to be, enough will make if he administers us with good sense and justness, in a word there is of change we are finished our scenario and we have to act otherwise. 

One of the first things that I mean the Spaniards, it is that not alone we have to lose the fear to the privatization but rather we must demand it urgently, because it is necessary to change the main mark of the society that is the government, the privatizations they bear some des adjusts, but the advantages to the long one, they are many for the society, the first one although it seems like it is that it removes him to be able to the politicians, to be able to and hits, thing of which know a lot in Spain, the main company of the country is the state in all its slopes and that can no longer continue.  

Examples are to privatize the railroads, they know you that the RENFE and ADIF prepare of more budget and personal that some ministries, they have been given for informed of the useless AVE that have built. It is necessary to privatize the airports physically and in their administration, you know the airports without flights neither passenger that has been built. It is necessary to privatize the harbor; you know the expenses that bear some ports that alone they are because an official entity that he/she calls himself "Harbor of the State" exists. it is necessary to privatize the TV, when the government loves us something that rents the time that he needs in commercial and private televisions and he says it, after he is devoted to govern and not to spend money in "having a good time pardon I meant to influence us, we will already make it us alone. And I have left for the end of the chapter, the fattest thing is to privatize the sanitary administration, the SS has not said. The how to make it is another topic that another day we will play. 

And for I finish it is necessary to work less so that they can work more, to me it has always missed me that the unions always have so little that to say, rather alone they have to say that we will pay general or partial strike the attention it depends, but they don't outline changes labor, new forms of working and of using, it doesn't stop them everything should follow the manager equally he steals to the worker and the worker steals to the manager, this it is his contribution to the modern society, and this cannot be this way for always, now that there is so much unemployment because there is little work, it is obvious that he would be necessary to work less, it is logical not, because he doesn't think about the labor day of 30 weekly hours, this is a little more than 20% less than the current one, it seems logical that if we have 20 unemployment% and let us believe a hole of same size, equal digs all the workers they don't find it. Because 30 hours it is necessary that daily the schedule is multiple of the 24 hours for the shifts that have to square.  

The thing this in knowing how to negotiate this with the companies, the workers and the government, so that the economic effects are adjusted among all, evidently the worker cannot pass to charge 20% less, but for sure something less if, because in many cases they would work the couple or a son that now it is in unemployment etc. and let us don't say of the possibility of reconciling the time free, less kangaroos, less charwomen, more power to go to the market, time to eat, less expense in restaurants, etc. The manager would be amazed that possibly the yield the productivity would not lower 20%, as a lot among 8/10%, for that reason it would continue there being unemployment but the one calls him logical 5/8%, this is not a story it is proven that the efficiency stays very much better in a short space of time than in days longest, and lastly the government should subsidize or to the worker or the company or both so that the salary result and of costs, it was assumable for both parts. 

Certainly the unions would also should of stopping to interfere in topics of labor schedules, mainly in the commercial schedule the companies, and the trade should have the freedom of opening so much and as they want, to be able to make variable of personal as weekend insoles, that is to say or run shifts, or workers that always prefer to work Saturdays and Sundays and clear in works that allow it and they require it, hear them I assure that there are a lot of people that if can win enough working two days, it stops then not you for example, to paint, to write, to study, they would make it. 

They are very already the topics enunciated serious easy question to apply them I assure it to him and the exchange society to better an atrocity, let us remove to the state what is not of the state, and let us give the work and the profitability to the society that he administers it to him efficiently and responsibly they don't find.