The
Government has settled in a deep concern, indignation and maximum alert for the
position of CiU that has manifested his decision of abstaining in the voting,
that of the law of Don Juan's Carlos I abdication. The president, Mariano
Rajoy, it has thrown a very hard message against that decision that to the
Executive you say it has surprised him, because CiU is one of the key signatories
of the constitutional pact of 1978, and it has always defended the monarchy and
besides the conversations with Duran I Lleida the Government he deduced that
the yes it was safe, at this time so important in the life of the Spanish"
nation.
Yes it is a
historical moment in Spain, but where the importance is, to see maybe I have
not understood it well but according to me I understand, the voting of the law
of the king's abdication, is a pure bureaucratic step, because we see somebody
it can prohibit a king to resign it would be absurd, if a king doesn't want or
it cannot continue reigning he won't force, among other things because it would
be a stupidity to leave a state boss acting as such if he doesn't want or it
cannot exercise his function well for very superficial that is, therefore what
difference does it make that it is voted or no. Mr. Rajoy is voted because the
constitution that you point defends it is not complete and it doesn't
contemplate many questions, and this it belongs one to them.
I don't
understand that you Mr. Rajoy, transfer to the public opinion a betrayal idea
that CIU will make to abstain before a natural fact, and that its abstention
doesn't imply anything, neither he chooses anything, neither it brakes anything,
the test it is that you have not requested a session of the congress to ask if
it was made or don't unite new law to incorporate it to the constitution, they
have simply had to make it and point.
It is you
very obtuse Mr. Rajoy says that the Government has acted with transparency and
loyalty, informing to all the political groups, it is that it is his
constitutional obligation, and I eat yourself he says: "Nobody has been
ignored or preterit", clear not toward any lack, it was simply necessary
to fix one of the many shortcomings that our hidden constitution and that they
will already go leaving to the light.
And the most
incoherent in their accusation is that he has added: Everybody can make the
decision that estimates convenient based on their history, to their freedom, or
to their own interests. The only thing that I would like it (he has said) it is
that in an occasion like this doesn't make "political small". And
this if I worry about because he gives me that to think that behind a human act
as the abdication of a tired and sick king, a "very big" politics
hides a politics that benefits somehow to the PP and the PSOE that are those
that have managed it this whole afer.
And he has
also reaffirmed to leave it very clear that the process of the abdication and
the new king's proclamation will make with or without CiU, it would lack more,
it is that it is you obtuse or it feels superior to all the other ones. It is
that you don't have another option, it is that the king leaves and it is
necessary to put other, it is that it is that simple such and like the
constitution is edited, it is not necessary to choose anything neither that to
say anything, a king leaves and he puts on other and point. Now then if what
you looked for is that CIU votes the unnecessary thing, to become this way
accomplice of I don't know what strategy you, the PP and the PSOE have been
mounted, with the acquiescence of the real house, you already see him the shot
it has left for the breech.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario