It is unheard what is happening in the western society, based mainly on the
democratic theory for governing their society, the course of the years has
deformed the true essence of the democracy and or a lot I make a mistake or we
are to a step that he becomes an absolute liberalism, alone for a political
class that transforms it into something totally headstrong.
In the last centuries, he has gone by several democracy stadiums. The
liberal democracy, an arisen generic type of politics of the independence of
the USA of 1776 and then you generalizes more or less with the republics and
constitutional monarchies that emerged of the emancipation processes or
revolutionaries, in against the old absolute monarchies that had been obsolete
for the own evolution of the societies, and the democracy whose main difference
is established that it was government's system in which the citizenship can
vote and also to be voted, to go being modeled toward the most modern social democracy
that nineteen arose at the end of the century.
The social democracy, is a version of the original democracy in which strengthens
the state intervention and to the creation of programs and organizations
sponsored by the State, to attenuate or to eliminate the inequalities and
social injustices that, as its defenders consider, it didn't contemplate the
fundamental democracy that was centered more in the economy free of market and
the capitalism. The social democracy leans on basically in the universal vote,
the notion of social justice, and a type of denominated state or guided as a
state of more well-being.
I believe that this evolution was almost natural because the humanity's
growth forced more and more to protect it, it was governed for but poor that
for rich, for but workers that managers, and the politicians that always look
for to please their voters, had to go modeling the fundamental base of the
initial democracy. Nevertheless these variables have overflowed in such a way
that today the politicians are considered as saviors of their societies and
they appropriate of some rights that the society has not given them and this
has returned to the politics and the politicians in something practically
headstrong and this gives that to think.
The first reflection is that the system has been endowed of too many
politicians, and I eat consequence of many political variables, and I not eat
of the abundance of positions and functions, the politician has already become
a social and professional class, how many politicians' thousands there is for
example in Spain, I don't believe to make a mistake if I calculate them in more
than 1.500,000 (active politicians, opposition, retired, executives of parties,
mayors, councilmen, etc.). This brings a first consequence, and it is that
against the normal thing in the quantity in fact, he is not the quality, if not
just the opposite, and it is this way easy that undesirable characters arise in
more or less grade. After all, the politician is not more than the
representation of the society of which is born or it is made.
As consequence of the great opening of social freedom that praises the new
democracy, they multiply the political or ideological theories of the society
almost indefinitely, which don't find another form of being channeled that the
inclusion in the general politics, getting with it to entangle the possibility
to take government's right and clear road and general objectives, now it is
necessary to please almost one by one, the desires I longings of each individual's
freedom can see this way that environmentalist democracies are believed,
nationalist democracies, right end democracies, democracies of right,
democracies of center right and center lefts, democracies of left, democracies
of extreme left, and inside each section multitude of variables almost already
unipersonal.
With this disparity recognizes it is impossible to govern us, and this is
what is killing our own freedom although it seems an absurdity, but it has
arrived to such an end the situation that an individual no longer has space to
be him, to think for itself, to make what he wants to make with his life, and
like it is attacked by infinity of tendencies, of incomprehension’s, and inherencies’,
it is forced or to take left by some or another existent form, that that
automatically hinders him his freedom that which leads to two postures: he
adapts and it augments a tendency, or their own space is mounted and we already
have another political party, or alternative movement, or any other subterfuge
form that complicates an and another time the coexistence in society.
Today I dare to say that the society is not he gets rid he looks for where
he looks at himself, we all are forced to take left by something, instead of
being devoted to live our own life, inside a mark and a wide and simple order
in that some for feeling and right have been won the obligation of governing to
the whole society, so that this feels really free to plan its own system of
life, inside the most scrupulous respect to the life and feelings of the other
one.
If the old democracy is not restored adapting it to the current situation,
the politics, the current democracy, doesn't have exit, this so polluted one
that it is about to lose all its value like generating element of freedom, of
respectability, and of understanding of the human rights. If we are not able
feel the trust again, that the system looks after me and my environment, and
that I can be devoted to live my life, frankly it won't be worthwhile to live
her.
It is necessary to decide if it is necessary to fight for this reason or no
longer voucher the pain, and if it is the second option the one that choose, let
us stop to wait to that the other forms of societies that exist in our world,
happen to us for above destroying our way of life, based on that "state of
the well-being" that the initial democracy offered us.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario