THE SOCIETY OF THE XXI CENTURY SHOULD CORRECT ITS DRIFT TOWARD THE ANONIMITY

I believe that most has an existential confusion very introduced inside our more primitive brain: we are or they have made this way us the circumstances of the life, of the history, our ancestors or all at the same time the fact is that they have become simple "civil" people said otherwise we have very put inside our internal feeling that we are TOWN. 

This inclination consubstantial, in the times that he plays us to live, is conditioning us a lot and it removes us value in front of the realities that now surround us, I believe that we are object of a very easy manipulation on the part of some few ones, but maybe already too many powers exercised by other people that without being more than the other ones, they have been able to exercise some lists of true supremacy on the designs of life and of human realization on its own congeners. 

The problem of this situation like he said, it is not new, this is this way since the "homo sapiens" appeared in the face of the earth and you contains in even first and in flock in a number bigger than two, from these moments two categories arose those that directed and those that followed the leaders, in the case of couple the male was continued by the female because it provided force and food therefore security, and in the flock the one that directed to the other men to take out bigger profit of the forces of the flock, or let us already say of the group or tribe, and that he also offered advantages to all those that continued him otherwise this figure has not never existed. 

The certain thing is that this relationship of following the initiatives of a "leader" was put inside our natural customs, maybe even it began to be part of our genes, although I suppose that an expert would correct me and he would tell me that in the genes changes of customs are not introduced, but I request that they try to understand what I mean, I think that this relationship, he has stayed inside all us and in a way or other he became something natural, with an important exception that was appearing with the step of the centuries and with the population's increase, and it is that the attitude of “following” the primate of the tribe, change with the time to be the obligation of "obeying" the one that sends. 

To extend more in this social evolution doesn't believe it is necessary, each one of you kind reader goes adding: stages, civilizations, centuries, arrive to organizations of Kingdom, of states, season it with civilizations and religions, and it arrived until this same moment in that I write this philosophical one I articulate. Well I wanted to locate him here and now, because it is now when I believe that this reality can be harming us a lot of, I believe sincerely that the object that imposed it that nothing else that the necessity to be survived has surpassed was not and he no longer makes sense, and before this evolution what has happened is that those that obey, (the town the civil society) we have increased exponentially, and those that send us continue being some few ones in the best in the cases, or even one in others. 

This evolution produces some injustices and imbalances now that certainly are not reasonable, we can read this way that the fortune of the world is in hands of some thousands that the alone big "tribes" are 193 for what one can deduce that more than seven thousand million human beings, we go in a way or another behind 190 leads, it is clear that this is an irrational aberration, because these leaders could not already protect us, to guide us and to defend, as that leader that left to hunt with ten or twelve men as him, to take food to the tribe or to avoid that another tribe removed them the one that they had. 

Don't they create that I will say them now that we don't need to the UN, or to the countless ones you do lead silent that are coupled forming governments, and ministries that already require hundred of sub leaders thousands that in turn they require millions of people that make an absolutely bureaucratic work that is good non point to give protection and security to the town like they want it to us to sell, but to have them the knowledge of everything and of all and with it, the power on the nation, the cities, the towns, "in definitive the tribe", and to make that I wonder, now no longer it is necessary go to hunt it is no longer necessary go to war, alone it is necessary to impose taxes for…… that? This it is the question. 

Now we do see and do we live as this whole organization of leaders, cannot it dominate their own magnitude, are the imbalances that have been created stronger than them, cannot they dominate the natural resources, cannot they distribute the wealth, neither the foods that the seven thousand million human beings produce some and do we lack other, and do we need all, and is the question, for what reason do we make it? because to satisfy to about seven millions more or less one, of rich considered people, the humanity lives like she can and there is alone 1 of each thousand that "enjoys" it, the thing this white that doesn't work. 

Don't ask me that I want to make with this whole reality, I don't know it very well, alone I want to make them see that you cannot continue being simply society or town, and to leave that other they use us like I believe that it has never been used the humanity, because for very hard that was old, where few times or no scruple had inclusive about the property of the human life, today's reality is much more terrible for the existent proportion among the wild use of the human life for the benefit of some few, really very few. He plays us to the society to fix this we don't wait that they get ready it, because you "lead" them they are no longer it, they have changed leader's spirit that means to guide and to be sacrificed by the tribe in the bottom, for the one to take advantage of the tribe for their purposes many times not appropriate.