It seems already hopeless, it is necessary to
take a solution to solve the problem of Europe, they are Only two options: to
go forward toward a more narrow union or back to as not well smaller a partial
breakup. This is what is in game and this said it me in an article June 1
happened already come it six months they have happened and the things have not
varied an apex for that reason I reissue it because it demonstrates well to the
white that we don't work neither forward neither back.
The area euro, just as this it has failed. It
was based on a group of principles that you/they have demonstrated to be unviable
to the first collision with a financial and fiscal crisis. The reason of this
is very simple, the European union derives of the incipient unions of markets
and trade, later to the second world war, these unions were made by the
interest on the part of Germany that like a locomotive, dragged the economy
post warlike with great force, and he needed coal, steel, and manpower, got it,
the German miracle arose strongly, I crawl to the rest of their neighbors and
with it I form a rich Europe and it prospers.
Germany not believed without with reason that
Europe was them, and he began to work so that the European nations felt it same
and it got it, the first founders of the euro zone (France, Luxemburg, Italy,
Belgium, Low Countries and the own Germany) they belonged to oneself derived
culture of the second world war that although one lived in these countries in
an unequal way, all were in some moment it leaves of the Germany Nazi, it stops
later on to become winners from the own Germany.
The biggest impulse arrives in 1957 with the
signature of the Treaties of Rome. The six decide to advance in the cooperation
in the economic, political and social domains. The outlined goal was to achieve
a common market that allows the free circulation of people, goods, and of
capitals. The European Community was in progress. But this union had forged it
Germany without place to doubts. Without their own economic interests, and the
necessity of leaving the defeat, stronger of that than it was when the
circumstances imposed by the rest of European countries led her to enter in war
with the rest of Europe. Nobody any other country European he had the enough
reasons to propose the European Union.
I also
believe that this incipient European union, also took place to be able to come
off of the apparent dependence of the USA and of its "European" all
the Great Britain, and of the fear to the expansion of the then USSR, so I have
the first idea of the UE very undoubtedly, neither it was altruistic, neither
it was shared, it was a so much imposed by Germany that needed it urgently, and
that if accepted by its allies for that these they saw that for separate, they
didn't count for anything in the world concert, as such an Europe it was in hands
of the USA and the USSR.
In 1965 a treaty is signed that gives step to
the creation of the European Commission (CE) and the Council of the European
Commission, organ that should not made a mistake with the European Council that
is the institutionalization of the summits of Bosses of State and of Government
of countries members that began to be developed at the end of the decade of the
60. I don't want to continue with a supplementary, alone history lesson he/she
wanted to make stress in the sense of the creation of the current UNITED
STATES.
The later events, amplifications, new treaties,
etc. has given the creation of an unique currency as a result, but don't unite
unique and balanced economy and this has not been this way, because from the
beginning this, Germany was not looked for he simply wanted to grow and to
become independent of the oppression of the winners, and fundamentally of the
USSR. He was so afraid to a communist reprisal that was even about to bleed
economically, when I annex their Democratic Germany, 1989, and in that moment
the effective thing was seen that it was again for their reconstruction, the
European Union.
But Germany has not assumed never this, Germany
it continues thinking that Europe is his and he doesn't give its arm to twist,
the bad thing or the good thing you not to define it, it is that or lively or
pushed by the successes of the first union, or for pressures of the other
partners to those that it is necessary also to allow them to decide something,
has left enlarging the union, and at the same time he has left dividing,
curious paradox, but this it is the reality, a reality that Germany doesn't
want to assume, and he doesn't realize that it leaves of the blame of what happens
now in Europe, it is for its blame, because it was her the one that form this
way it, and when it was him well he/she applauded it, you pleasure to itself,
and he/she expanded it selfishly and without control, and this it is the
current situation.
Now it is necessary to take conscience of it and
to decide openly that it is Europe, and if the answer is "AN ASSOCIATION
OF COMMERCIAL INTERESTS” it is necessary to disassemble it and go to look for
more small, homogeneous and balanced unions. And if the answer is then "AN
UNION OF EUROPEAN NATIONS” it is necessary to reinforce it with an only
constitution, and at the same time, the renouncement of all, to our identity
national singular, to become EUROPEAN, that hard, and the one that doesn't want
to lose its identity, has to stay it was, and if they are many those that think
this way, because good-bye to the European Union.
Let us don't cover but the truth is not the debt
of the PIGS or the pressure of the markets on the Euro, we are us because we don't
behave evenly as they make it the USA, China, Brazil etc.… for that reason they
attack us the markets, and not because some should more than other, the markets
are not silly and I make you this What a question it wins the market if the
European debt collapses, it doesn't win he/she swims on the contrary it loses
the debt, because nobody won't return it.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario