THE OFFICIAL LIES OF THE G20 AND THEIR USELESS REPRESENTATION

We have just passed another meeting of the denominated G20, paradigm of the globalization and of the world economic markets, all Europa was expectant to see if the world economy represented by this organization, it will put solutions to the problem of Europe. That disillusion, step the meeting and anything you arrangement but rather on the contrary. 

And it is that the G20 is another lie imposed by the Anglo-Saxon economy to make see that there is a globalization of the economy, thing that doesn't exist, but that he gives them the possibility to continue dominating the market thanks to the knowledge of the same one. It is impossible that such a wide and disparate organization, be good for something more than to make a fiesta of so much as long as, and to know what cooks in other places first hand and this way to be able to prepare strategies. To support what I am saying I have prepared them two graphics that demonstrate that the proportions of the markets that the  composes G20 are so exaggeratedly different that in no way neither the problems neither the objectives of each one, they can be paged more or less in a guideline common. 

In view of this graph, like one can make believe to the world society that the interests of Australia the country with more rent per capita represented in the G20, they can have something in common with the India that being second o'clock more populated, he/she has the index per lower capita of the group, it is irrational to seek that the India understands the problem of debt of Europe, or that he understands that the USA is in recession danger. The question that they will be asked in any event will be. That they know those about recession and of misery that “milonga” wants to be that is me who helps that it invests in European debt and a horn this it is not my problem. 

My readers know my opinion that the globalization is a perverse invention manufactured by the Anglo-Saxon financial markets. To loaf the whole world economy (that yes while they can), because one day it arrived that the markets BRICS was not allowed to influence more. We are still far from this and it stops example they look at the second graph in that the comparison is in the same terms that the previous one but for global markets  

As it is demonstrated in the graph, the difference among the real economic situation, the one that is good to perceive like it feels the society the effect of their economy, the one that affects them directly and for consequence how they reacted in the face of the economy globalized, it is completely disproportionate, alone there are two economies that have similarity and therefore they should have the same problems and the same solutions that are the economy Anglo-Saxon components of the G20 (the USA is included) and the economy of the European Union, the other economies reflected in the graph that you/they would represent the other world economic blocks, are of laugh in front of both big. 

It will be necessary to finish with a conclusion, because I will have taken the nuisance of working so much to finish saying something, you will be said, because indeed what I mean is that Europe should not expect anything from the G20, because they lack many years until the economic relationships can be similar, for what my advice is that he closes in itself, and outline their own exit programs, and economic plans of expansion and survival, already same, and that he doesn't pay its enemy's attention or if they prefer it its competition it is the Anglo-Saxon economy that is the one that to continue being the first one, he/she needs that Europe is second. 

I also mean that a thing is the quantity and other the quality, this says it because some of you will say that I forget that China, is about to surpass to the USA like the first economy of the world, I don't not forget, but it is that this is another concept, a thing in that thousands of millions of workers bill between all more than three hundred millions, and another very different one is that the economy of the three hundred is much more powerful and more sustainable, for its individual capacity of expense and of saving of paying imposed etc. That the one that they offer to its own internal market the a thousand millions of the other side. 

Finally to expose that this situation is to control it, because to me he scares me that the world seeks to equal the social economies for the part of below, because to make coincide the economies societies for the part of up, I believe that the world would not sustain it although certainly serious a marvel.