THE UE SHOULD ASK IN REFERENDUM IF GREAT BRITAIN SHOULD OR NOT TO CONTINUE IN THE UNION

Every time is more than evident that the European Union should be recomposed and this not you if he means that it should change government's structure and operation or it should disappear this way definitively, I have always said that for me a European union doesn't exist, a European coexistence that he tries to go to be something simply exists more important with the purpose of that the rest of the world believes it to him and it considers us as a group of economic importance and politics. Today we can say clearly that this game ended neither we are an economic power neither politics and the worst thing we are not even a warlike power that supports us. 

So that we lack to end up being a power in today's world uniformity we lack economy we lack an unique nationality, we lack an official and shared language, and for I finish we lack some armed forces that impose own security before the other world powers, and they don't tell me that it stops that the NATO is because it is not in fact true the NATO it is the protection of the USA, but they are not the armed force of Europe notices that all the grateful and important blocks of the current world are it for first two basic reasons its warlike force and second its economic force it is never on the contrary it is more if we notice one of them RUSSIA like economy is the last one but like warlike force is of the best and with this alone to see who it discusses him that economically it is a disaster. 

Europe has not gotten an alone clear union he has grouped that it is not the same thing, but this doesn't have solidity some because in fact today is broken in several groupings I don't believe that it is necessary to deepen in this all you know it: the 17 of the euro the rest up to the 28, those that are waiting and it is not known very well what they will be and among these still this Turkey that doesn't know neither herself that it is if European or Oriental. This reality makes impossible to me to understand the UE like Germany and France they thought of its moment to seek to continue with this idea to my way of doing with the current circumstances it is a community suicide because there is no way that it is structured and it is balanced like they can make it the USA, China, or Russia. 

The disagreements among the members of the UE every time they are more they will be able to me to say that it is for blame of the economic crisis and it is true, but this doesn't leave worthless my posture in fact confirms it serious now with a crisis after other when you had to have united more this UE and to be had more solid and stronger fact and however it is just the opposite. The bosses of State and of Government of the European Union (UE) they debate from yesterday another time the petitions of David Cameron, first British minister, to support the permanency of United Kingdom in the UE in the referendum that will take place before it finishes 2017. 

In the Euro summit it appeared some progress, as the bias that showed the German chancellor Angela Merkel, to change the Treaties in a future, but a thing was clear: the negotiation won't be anything easy, especially in a point, the one of limiting certain rights of the citizens of the UE that reside in United Kingdom. This cannot be alone Great Britain it is of the UE when it interests him alone to make financial business it is not part of the euro it doesn't defend it on the contrary it is together to the economy dollar, above he receives economic compensations on the part of the CE. And finally every year it blackmails us with the same threat the one of leaving the union. 

This time the Great Britain, he has come with four impositions, a has already exposed it in the previous paragraph. More near, although not easy, they seem the positions in the other three demands of Cameron: that the advances in integration don't discriminate against to the countries that are not part of the euro (that is to say to themselves), un bureaucracy the UE and to escape from the mentions of the European Treaty that urge to the States Member to always advance toward "a more and more narrow" union (that is to say he speaks in third person, but in fact he refers to itself). 

London also wants to be able to freeze during four years’ certain social benefits to the European workers that go to work to the Kingdom United, but many countries they consider that that would be expressly a forbidden discrimination for the Treaties. In the UE, the Government of a country can have the State of the Well-being that wants, big or small, but it cannot apply norms different to the citizens that reside for reason of his nationality in him.  

The entrance UE in front of this umpteenth blackmail wants to seem strong and united but there is not who believes it to him. We "want to maintain to the United Kingdom in the UE, but at the same time, the basic foundations, as the nondiscrimination and the movement freedom, we don't want to restrict" them, he affirmed to their arrival the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, also François Hollande, French president recognized that the exchange of positions during the dinner in which was the matter of the proposals of London, had been hard: "The dialogue was, to say it in a diplomatic way, free. The limit to the social benefits, found many that it is very far and it is very difficult of reconciling with the Treaties." 

Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, although it showed their trust in that they will be able to reach an agreement, it qualified of "unacceptable" some of the petitions of London. In way more or less direct, countries like Spain, Portugal, Hungary or Lithuania showed their opposition to that British petition and Jean Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, requested from a politically correct way to United Kingdom that presents him another different proposal. "The Commission is clever to look at other options besides the only proposal for the first British" minister, Juncker affirmed to its entrance. 

A high Spanish diplomatic source summarized this week the posture of most of the Council in a less politically correct way: "Such and as they request it, one cannot make. We cannot reform the Treaties to consecrate a discrimination", until it moves me so much clairvoyance on the part of a Spanish representative in the CE since I have always believed that they are there to say if Mister or Mrs., when finishing the last night encounter, Cameron was shown cynic and absolutely British, that is to say it was felt that he had played the eggs to the whole continental Europe that is apparently its work. "Today we have taken a great step toward a better agreement for the United" Kingdom, he affirmed, although it recognized that the negotiation will be difficult [...] because what we want to make is difficult." 

In the conclusions of the summit, the bosses of State and Government of the UE they committed to "work closely to find mutually satisfactory solutions in the four areas in the European Council of February 18-19 2016", until then, he will be necessary to go polishing differences. At the moment, Merkel has broken a taboo definitively, the one of not discarding a pact to change the Treaties in the future. All the leaders show in public their will of reaching an agreement in February, but there is not anything guaranteed, neither so at least that that agreement is enough so that, in the referendum that doesn't still have date, win the option of remaining in the UE. I don't know how they come it, but me of the CE or the UE like mean to counter-attack to the Great Britain that their petitions this time they will be proposed to the European society by means of a referendum to see if they want that the Bran Britain continues or not in the European Union.