THE WRONG USE OF THE DEMOCRACY FOR PART OF ALL, IT CAN TAKE US TO WORSE CONSEQUENCES.

It is unheard what is happening in the western society, based mainly on the democratic theory for governing their society, the course of the years has deformed the true essence of the democracy and or a lot I make a mistake or we are to a step that he becomes an absolute, totally headstrong liberalism. 

In the last centuries, he has gone by several democracy stadiums. The liberal democracy, an arisen generic type of politics of the independence of the USA of 1776 and then more or less generalized in the republics and constitutional monarchies that emerged of the emancipation processes or revolutionaries against the absolute monarchies and they established government's systems in those that the population can vote and to be voted, to go being modeled toward the most modern social democracy that nineteen arose at the end of the century. 

The social democracy, is a version of the original democracy in which is appealed to the state intervention and the creation of programs and organizations sponsored by the State, to attenuate or to eliminate the inequalities and social injustices that, as its defenders consider, it didn't contemplate the fundamental democracy that was centered more in the economy free of market and the capitalism. The social democracy leans on basically in the universal vote, the notion of social justice, and a type of denominated state or guided as a state of more well-being. 

I believe that this evolution was almost natural because the humanity's growth forced more and more to protect it, it was governed for but poor that rich, for but workers that managers, and the politicians that always look for to please their voters, had to go modeling the fundamental base of the initial democracy. Nevertheless these variables have overflowed in such a way that the society has already become practically headstrong and this gives that to think. 

The first reflection is that the system has been endowed of too many politicians, and I eat consequence of many political variables, and I not eat of the abundance of positions and functions, the politician has already become a social and professional class, how many politicians' thousands there is for example in Spain, I don't believe to make a mistake if I calculate them in more than 1.500,000 (active politicians, opposition, retired, executives of parties, militant of identification card, mayors, councilmen, etc.). This brings a first consequence, and it is that against the normal thing in the quantity in fact, he is not the quality, if not just the opposite, and it is this way easy that undesirable characters arise in more or less grade. After all, the politician is not more than the representation of the society of which is born or it is made. 

As consequence of the great opening of social freedom that praises the new democracy, they multiply the political or ideological theories of the society almost indefinitely, which don't find another form of being channeled that the inclusion in the general politics, getting with it to entangle the possibility to take government's right and clear road and general objectives, now it is necessary to please almost one by one, the desires I longings of each individual's" "freedom can see this way that environmentalist democracies are believed, nationalist democracies, right end democracies, democracies of right, democracies of center right and center lefts, democracies of left, democracies of extreme left, and inside each section multitude of variables almost already personal. 

With this disparity recognizes it is impossible to govern us, and this is what is killing our own freedom although it seems an absurdity, but it has arrived to such an end the situation that an individual no longer has space to be him, to think for itself, to make what he wants to make with his life, and like it is attacked by infinity of tendencies, of incomprehension’s, and interferences, it is forced or to take left by some or another existent form, that that automatically hinders him his freedom that which leads to two postures: he adapts and it augments a tendency, or their own space is mounted and we already have another political party, or alternative movement, or any other subterfuge form that complicates an and another time the coexistence in society.   

Today I dare to say that the society is not he gets rid he looks for where he looks at himself, we all are forced to take left by something, instead of being devoted to live our own life, inside a mark and a wide and simple order in that some for feeling and right have been won the obligation of governing to the whole society, so that this feels really free to plan its own system of life, inside the most scrupulous respect to the life and feelings of the other one. 

If the old democracy is not restored adapting it to the current situation, the politics, the current democracy, doesn't have exit, this so polluted one that it is about to lose all its value like generating element of freedom, of respectability, and of understanding of the human rights. If we are not able feel the trust again, that the system looks after me and my environment, and that I can be devoted to live my life, frankly it won't be worthwhile to live her.  

It is necessary to decide if it is necessary to fight for this reason or no longer voucher the pain, and if it is the second option the one that choose, to sit down to wait to that the other forms of societies that exist in our world, happen to us for above destroying our way of life, based on that "state of the well-being" that the initial democracy offered us.