TO MORE OF 1,4 MILLION HOMES CUT THEM THE LIGHT IN 2012

He could not believe it, and I don't say it in the surprise sense for the fact in yes since he unites to the housing ousters, to the poor that have go to eat to Faces, etc. this it is our today country what I am surprised it is that if in the year 2012 were more than 1.4 millions in this 2013 it should already be about the 2 millions. 

And arrived to this supposition I tell myself to myself to that he is waiting the state and the society to put a solution to this, we will wait to that they have some suicides, or that a young judge with desires of working the it consults in the tribunal of human rights, we cannot continue seeing as the social life of our country he deteriorates this way so cruel and ineffective they will see because I say it. 

To cut the light of a neighbor that one doesn't pay two or three receipts of the light is a stupidity because the electric companies don't recover the light that they have cut they should continue "manufacturing electricity” equally and the most painful thing is that this electricity gets lost it cannot store for another use, he leaves, it disappears, it is evident that if speaks of 1.4 million consumers located in a dependent sector of a distribution transformer we could reduce the production that feeds him but this is not this way in a stairway he is removed the light to two neighbors of a total of 12 and the company it continues him costing the same thing to take the electricity there that if to the neighbor they leave it to dark. 

I understand that in normal situation this action of cutting the supply to the doubtful ones is logical comprehensible and necessary and I don't discuss her, but in the current social situation it is another example of the stupidity of the civil code, of trade and of all that they want I believe that this situation should think about with a logic but social that is to say if a family that maintains like he can its floor the food the school the sanity and he doesn't receive to pay the light one two or three months and almost I dare to say that those that are while he is proven that it is not because if it should not be left without the possibility of use of the electricity of this family unit because in the bottom although they cut him the cable the company it will continue producing that electricity where the effectiveness of the action is or it is necessary to take it like punishment to be poor. 

These things light me I can understand more than a bank makes an ouster because the object in theory doesn't consume and because he can sell it and to make up for of the lost one that not to remove the light to an user that cannot truly make in front of all the expenses of the family unit in the current circumstances. I believe that another solution should be looked for example to allow to even accumulate a debt until certain level to be able to reduce the consumption obligatorily installing a constrainer that alone it allows the essential thing. That the electricity CIA can be disencumbered something of this situation of I don't get paid in its taxes etc.  

In short it is that living in a lower country are already that those considered of the third world because there for sure to the one that cut him the light, at the few hours is punctured in the general line and it continues having the one that needs because there are not the law neither the citizenship sense that there is here "still" but if we continue for this road we are heading to that that once a while ago scribe saying that we are to point in Spain of beginning the civil revolution with so much unemployed it seems that we are accelerating it to forced marches