12 MONTHS LATER GERMANY IF IT CAN BE EUROPE BUT IT CAN BE ITS GREECE

It seems already hopeless, it is necessary to take a solution to solve the problem of Greece, they are Only two options: to go forward toward a more narrow union or back to as not well smaller a partial breakup. This is what is in game and this said it me in an article June 1 happened already come it they have spent more than six months and the things have not varied an apex, on the contrary they have worsened because it is demonstrated well to the white that we don't go neither forward neither back.    

The area euro is failing, maybe be because its foundations are not the appropriate ones to solve the current problems, the UE is based on a group of principles that they have demonstrated to be inviable to the first collision against a financial and fiscal crisis. The reason of this is very simple, the European union derives of the incipient unions of markets and trade, later to the second world war, these unions were made by the interest on the part of Germany that like a locomotive, dragged the economy post warlike with great force, and he needed coal, steel, and manpower that it didn't possess, it got it, the German miracle arose strongly, I crawl to the rest of their neighbors and with it make an Europe based on the production the wealth and the prosperity.   

Germany not believed without with reason that Europe was them, and he began to work so that the European nations felt it same and it got it, the first founders of the euro zona (France, Luxemburg, Italy, Belgium, Low Countries and the own Germany) they belonged to oneself culture. The biggest impulse arrives in 1957 with the signature of the Treaties of Rome. The six decide to advance in the cooperation in the economic, political and social domains. 

The outlined goal was to achieve a “COMMON MARKET” that allows the free circulation of people, goods, and of capitals. The European Community was in progress. But this union had forged it Germany without place to doubts. Without their own economic interests, and the evidence of leaving their defeat, stronger of that than it was the drove to create together with France the UE. Nobody any other country European have the enough reasons to propose this objective so ilusionante and necessary. 

I also believe that this incipient European union, also took place to be able to come off of the apparent dependence of the USA and of its "European" ally the Great Britain, and of the fear to the expansion of the then USSR, so I have the first idea of the UE very undoubtedly, neither it was altruistic, neither it was shared, it was a so much imposed by Germany and France that needed it urgently, and that if it was accepted by its respective allies because these they saw that for separate, they didn't count for anything in the world concert, as independent countries they saw that it was in hands of the USA and the USSR.   

In 1965 a treaty is signed that gives step to the creation of the European Commission (CE) and the Council of the European Commission, organ that should not made a mistake with the European Council that is the institutionalization of the summits of Bosses of State and of Government of countries members that began to be developed at the end of the decade of the 60. I don't want to continue with a supplementary, alone history lesson he wanted to make stress in the sense of the creation of the current UNITED STATES. The later events, amplifications, new treaties, etc. has given the creation of an unique currency as a result, but don't unite unique and balanced economy Germany it has not assumed never this,  

Germany continues thinking that the UE is his and he/she doesn't give its arm to twist, the bad thing or the good thing you not to define it, it is that lively or pushed by the successes of the first union, or for pressures of the other partners to those that it is necessary also to allow them to decide something, left enlarging the union, and at the same time that this happened he has left dividing, curious paradox, but this it is the reality, a reality that Germany doesn't want to assume, and he doesn't realize that it leaves of the blame of what happens now in Europe, it is for its blame, because it was her the one that form this way it, and when it was him well he applauded it, itself liked it, and he expanded it selfishly and without control, and this it is the current situation. 

Now it is necessary to take conscience of it and to decide openly that it is the UE, and if the answer is "AN ASSOCIATION OF INTERESTS COMMERCIAL” it is necessary to disassemble it and go to look for more small, homogeneous and balanced unions. And if the answer is then "AN UNION OF EUROPEAN NATIONS” it is necessary to reinforce it with an only constitution, and at the same time, the renouncement of all, to our identity national singular, to become EUROPEAN, that hard, and the one that doesn't want to lose its identity, has to stay it was, and if they are many those that think this way, because good-bye to the UE. 

I am more than convinced that we are not an Union of Nations but alone of interests and it is for this reason that we don't work because the interests of some they are not possible to sustain and so at least to end up obtaining them for other and this has put it visible Greece it is impossible we already know it all that Greece can complete the interests of the rest of the such UE and like they are established and this it is the reality, the UE it should change the economic norms, so that Greece can adapt, because what cannot make is to change to Greece no matter how much he wants to make it. 

And if one doesn't want to change the economic conditions now in vigor it is necessary to stop to lose the time with discussions with Greece because otherwise the reactions will extend in other countries that without giving disagreement samples if they are very tired that the things go very alone for some.